Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Fortinet FortiGate IPS compete in the advanced security features category. Fortinet FortiGate IPS often has the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and perceived value.
Features: Splunk User Behavior Analytics provides robust detection of insider threats with advanced algorithms and comprehensive reporting. It is known for its predictive insights and powerful search capabilities leveraging a machine data platform. Splunk's solutions allow for integration and alert management, with user-friendly dashboards and straightforward configuration. Fortinet FortiGate IPS offers real-time threat prevention and extensive integration options with superior network performance. It features application control, firewall management, and SD-WAN capabilities, providing a user-friendly interface and stable platform for threat mitigation.
Room for Improvement: Splunk User Behavior Analytics could improve its deployment efficiency and reduce the time required for configuration. Enhancements in scaling its solutions could also be beneficial, as well as refining customization options to fit diverse environments better. Fortinet FortiGate IPS may work on integrating more innovative AI features and improving its UI further for non-expert users. Additionally, expanding support for more advanced security protocols and enhancing the flexibility of policy management could bolster its offerings.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiGate IPS is known for its streamlined deployment process and solid technical support, making it a preferred choice for users seeking quick implementation. In comparison, Splunk User Behavior Analytics has a more complex deployment, often requiring additional configuration time. Despite this, Splunk still offers robust customer support but is sometimes overshadowed by Fortinet's straightforward setup and resources.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk User Behavior Analytics involves a higher initial setup cost; however, its long-term ROI is significant due to its effective insider threat management. Conversely, Fortinet FortiGate IPS offers a more cost-effective initial investment with rapid ROI owed to its potent threat prevention capabilities. When considering budget constraints, Fortinet may appeal for immediate cost savings, while Splunk is better suited for those emphasizing longer-term security investment.
The solution can save costs by improving incident resolution times and reducing security incident costs.
The technical support from Fortinet is rather good.
Fortinet support is very responsive.
Mission-critical offering a dedicated team, proactive monitoring, and fast resolution.
From the responsiveness perspective, Splunk is very responsive with SLA-bound support for premium tiers.
Splunk's technical support is amazing.
I can easily integrate it with FortiFabric and manage multiple firewalls and other Fortinet solutions from a single dashboard.
The scalability of Fortinet FortiGate IPS is good, and I would rate it nine out of ten.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics is highly scalable, designed for enterprise scalability, allowing expansion of data ingestion, indexing, and search capabilities as log volumes grow.
There are no issues with stability, and it integrates seamlessly with the main product, which is a firewall.
Stability is generally good, but if you include FortiOS underlying in the FortiGate, there are often some patches to do and some loopholes.
With built-in redundancy across zones and regions, 99.9% uptime is achievable.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a one hundred percent stable solution.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics is highly stable and reliable, even in large-scale enterprise environments with high log injection rates.
More advanced AI capabilities would be beneficial in future updates.
Scalability issues.
The pricing of Fortinet FortiGate IPS could always be improved.
Global reach allows deployment of apps and services closer to users worldwide, but data sovereignty concerns exist and region selection must align with compliance requirements.
I encountered several issues while trying to create solutions for this advanced version, which seem unrelated to query or data issues.
High data ingestion costs can be an issue, especially for large enterprises, as Splunk charges based on the amount of data processed.
There are no extra expenses involved after purchasing the solution.
I rate the pricing with an eight out of ten.
Reserved instances with one or three-year commitments offer lower rates, providing up to 70% savings.
Comparing with the competitors, it's a bit expensive.
The pricing is based on the amount of data processed, and it is considered a high-level investment for enterprises.
The most valuable feature is the deep inspection for traffic, which is capable of identifying zero-day attacks.
The firewalls are valuable for threat prevention.
It provides real-time updates, offering a good vision on any changes.
I also utilize it for anomaly detection and behavior analysis, particularly using Splunk's machine learning environment.
The best features in Splunk User Behavior Analytics include anomaly detection, behavioral profiling, and risk scoring and prioritization functionality.
It correlates all the historical data, compares the upcoming behavior with what's already stored in the platform, and reduces false positives.
Fortinet FortiGate IPS is a highly effective intrusion detection and prevention solution. It is designed to secure a user’s system from end to end and ensure that users are equipped to handle even the most sophisticated threats. Organizations across a wide variety of industries trust IPS to help them prevent unwanted intrusions from harming their networks.
Fortinet FortiGate IPS Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Fortinet FortiGate IPS include:
Fortinet FortiGate IPS Features
Reviews from Real Users
Fortinet FortiGate IPS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages are the powerful zero-day protection features and the way it manages to compete with even its fiercest competitors.
Srahavan A., the CEO of a computer software company, said, “We like signature-based anomaly detection and zero-day protection features. For zero-day protection, we use Cloud Sandboxing, so whenever the zero-day threat occurs, it automatically sends it to its Cloud Sandbox. After getting information from Cloud Sandbox, then the intrusion is defined.”
Sachin V., a network administrator said, “We've found the most valuable feature to be the very user-friendly interface... It has a good set of UTM features, a good bandwidth shaping mechanism, and other features. It has efficient algorithms and it competes well with Palo Alto and TechPoint.”
Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a behavior-based threat detection is based on machine learning methodologies that require no signatures or human analysis, enabling multi-entity behavior profiling and peer group analytics for users, devices, service accounts and applications. It detects insider threats and external attacks using out-of-the-box purpose-built that helps organizations find known, unknown and hidden threats, but extensible unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, provides context around the threat via ML driven anomaly correlation and visual mapping of stitched anomalies over various phases of the attack lifecycle (Kill-Chain View). It uses a data science driven approach that produces actionable results with risk ratings and supporting evidence that increases SOC efficiency and supports bi-directional integration with Splunk Enterprise for data ingestion and correlation and with Splunk Enterprise Security for incident scoping, workflow management and automated response. The result is automated, accurate threat and anomaly detection.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
