FileAudit vs Microsoft Sentinel comparison

FileAudit and Microsoft Sentinel offer distinct capabilities in the realm of security and audit solutions. Based on user reviews, Microsoft Sentinel is seen as superior due to its advanced features, though FileAudit is appreciated for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

Features: FileAudit users appreciate its straightforward file monitoring and alerting features, ease of configuration, and simplicity. Microsoft Sentinel is praised for its robust detection capabilities, advanced analytics, and seamless integration with other Microsoft services. FileAudit scores for its simplicity, while Microsoft Sentinel’s extensive feature set provides deeper insights and broader security coverage.

Room for Improvement: FileAudit users suggest improvements in scalability, integration with other tools, and enhancing capacity for large data sets. Microsoft Sentinel users indicate a need for enhancements in documentation, occasional user interface improvements, and more intuitive setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FileAudit typically has a quicker and more straightforward deployment process with good customer support. FileAudit offers ease and speed. Microsoft Sentinel’s deployment can be complex due to its extensive configuration options but is well-supported by Microsoft’s customer service team. Deploying Microsoft Sentinel may require more effort but comes with robust customer support.

Pricing and ROI: FileAudit is often cited for its lower setup costs and favorable ROI due to its simplicity and straightforward pricing structure. Microsoft Sentinel, though priced higher, is considered worth the investment by users due to its advanced features and comprehensive security benefits. FileAudit is appreciated for cost efficiency, while Microsoft Sentinel is valued for delivering higher ROI through its extensive capabilities.