Falcon LogScale vs Graylog comparison

Read 21 Graylog reviews

8,998 Views
8,998 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Falcon LogScale

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Graylog and Falcon LogScale are both prominent players in the log management category. Falcon LogScale appears to hold the upper hand with a more advanced feature set, justifying its higher cost for users who prioritize functionality.

Features: Graylog offers valuable features such as efficient log aggregation, robust search capabilities, and cost-effective performance. Falcon LogScale is notable for its impressive scalability, advanced data analytics, and comprehensive capabilities, giving it an edge in handling large-scale operations.

Room for Improvement: Graylog could enhance its visualization tools, flexibility, and user interface. Falcon LogScale users suggest improvements in integration capabilities, documentation clarity, and ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Graylog is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, making it accessible for smaller teams. Falcon LogScale involves a more complex deployment process but offers expert customer service to guide clients effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Graylog presents competitive setup costs with a decent ROI, catering to cost-conscious users. Despite Falcon LogScale's higher initial expenses, its comprehensive capabilities and enhanced performance are perceived to justify the investment, potentially leading to a higher ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Falcon LogScale vs. Graylog Report (Updated: July 2025).

Falcon LogScale vs. Graylog

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Falcon LogScale

Ranking in Log Management

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Graylog

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Falcon LogScale is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog is 6.4%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Shaik Shaheer

Security | SIEM Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management

It allows us to efficiently manage and store our data. Its compression and archiving features not only reduce storage costs but also minimize the infrastructure resources needed for data backup. Since we have multiple security solutions in place, it allows us to streamline data handling. We can selectively send security-related events to the SIEM while directing other non-security events from various tools to Falcon LogScale. This flexibility ensures that we have access to all the data we need when required, and we can easily export this data from it as necessary, optimizing our data management and making it readily available for analysis or other purposes.

Read full review

Ivan Kokalovic

DevOps Engineer at Proton Technologies

Facilitates backend service monitoring with efficient log retrieval and API flexibility

Graylog is valuable because it bridges technical knowledge to non-technical teams, presenting complex backend processes in a simple timeline. It boosts the knowledge of sales and customer support teams by allowing them to see the backend operations without needing to read the code. Its API is flexible for visualization, and its powerful search engine efficiently handles large volumes of log data. Moreover, its stability, fast search capabilities, and compatibility with languages like ANSI SQL enhance its utility in IT infrastructure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."

"The fast search and index-free data retention are very valuable."

"One of the key features is the fast search functionality, enabling us to get results within a few seconds."

"Graylog is very handy."

"I am very proud of how very stable the solution is."

"Everything stands out as valuable, including the fact that I can quantify and qualify the logs, create pipelines and process the logs in any way I like, and create charts or data maps."

"One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview."

"We run a containerized microservices environment. Being able to set up streams and search for errors and anomalies across hundreds of containers is why a log aggregation platform like Graylog is valuable to us."

"The ability to write custom alerts is key to information security and compliance."

"The Graylog features that have proven to be most beneficial for our data analysis in particular are that we tend to use it as a big data store, so we have the correlation rules that, if something matches under certain conditions, it raises an alarm."

"Open source and user friendly."

More Graylog pros

Cons

"The price could be lower."

"The integration could improve."

"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."

"The infrastructure cost is the main issue. I like the rest. If the infrastructure costs could be lower, it would be fantastic."

"The area in Graylog that needs to be improved or enhanced would be the integrations."

"Since container orchestration systems are popular and Graylog fits the niche well, perhaps they could officially support running in docker containers on Kubernetes as a StatefulSet as a use case. That way, the declarative nature of Kubernetes config files would document their best case deployment scenario-"

"When it comes to configuring the processing pipeline, writing the rules can be very tedious, especially since the documentation isn't extensive on how the functions provided for these rules work."

"We ran into problems with Elasticsearch throwing a circuit-breaking exception due to field data size being too large. It turned out that the heap size directly impacted this size in a high-throughput environment, causing unexplained instability in Graylog. We were able to troubleshoot on the Elasticsearch size, but we should have been able to reference some minimum requirements for Graylog to know that our settings weren't sufficient."

"Over six months, I had two similar issues where searches were performed on field "messages". It exhausted all the memory of the ES node causing an ES crash and a Graylog halt."

"With technical support, you are on your own without an enterprise license."

"Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes."

More Graylog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."

"There is an open source version and an enterprise version. I wouldn't recommend the enterprise version, but as an open source solution, it is solid and works really well."

"I use the free version of Graylog."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"It's open source and free. They have a paid version, but we never looked into that because we never needed the features of the paid version."

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

"Having paid official support is wise for projects."

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

More Graylog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Falcon LogScale?

It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past.

What needs improvement with Falcon LogScale?

The integration could improve. Easy parser writing should be an option to ingest log in a human-readable format for unsupported devices. For visibility perspective, the dashboard should be more use...

What is your primary use case for Falcon LogScale?

Initially, the log was for log management. We store our logs for achieving compliance and log retention for longer periods. This function, LogScale, is now a platform where we can do correlation as...

What do you like most about Graylog?

The product is scalable. The solution is stable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not familiar with the pricing details of Graylog, as I was not responsible for that aspect. It was determined that we didn't need an enterprise plan, which is more suited for clients with less...

What needs improvement with Graylog?

An improvement I would suggest is in Graylog's user interface, such as allowing for font size adjustments. A potential enhancement could be the integration with Ollama to run large language models ...

Elastic Stack vs Falcon LogScale

Comparisons

Compared 34% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 25% of the time

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 11% of the time

Datadog vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 8% of the time

More Falcon LogScale Competitors

Grafana Loki vs Graylog

Compared 33% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog

Compared 25% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog

Compared 11% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Graylog

Compared 3% of the time

More Graylog Competitors

Product Reports

Download Falcon LogScale product report

Log Management

July 2025

Download Graylog product report

August 2025

Also Known As

No data available

Graylog2

Overview

Falcon LogScale is a modern log management tool that offers robust features for organizations seeking efficient log analysis. It provides high-speed log ingestion and query capabilities, enabling detailed insights into system performance and security events.

Falcon LogScale provides an efficient way for IT teams to handle massive volumes of log data. Its architecture supports rapid ingestion and real-time querying, making it ideal for security and operational analytics. With customizable search capabilities, it allows deep analysis to detect anomalies and troubleshoot issues effectively. Users appreciate its scalability and performance-driven approach, making it suitable for large infrastructures.

What are the most important features of Falcon LogScale?

High-Speed Log Ingestion: Manages vast amounts of log data swiftly and efficiently.
Real-Time Querying: Enables quick analysis and insights into current data.
Scalability: Designed to grow with the expanding needs of large organizations.
Customizable Searching: Offers granular search options for precise data examination.

What benefits or ROI should be anticipated?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines log analysis processes.
Improved Security Posture: Identifies security threats quickly through powerful search and alert capabilities.
Cost-Effective Scaling: Offers scalable solutions that grow with business needs.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on log data management and analysis.

Falcon LogScale is particularly beneficial in industries requiring detailed compliance reporting and real-time threat detection, such as finance and healthcare. It's implemented to support security operations and incident response teams by providing timely insights and operational efficiencies.

CrowdStrike

Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

Considerably faster analysis speeds.
More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
Lower cost than alternatives.
Full-scale customer service.
No expensive training or tool experts required.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur