ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] comparison

ExtraHop Networks and F5 are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of F5 users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

992 Views
208 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Threat Stack Cloud Security...

Read 8 Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] reviews

88% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Threat Stack Cloud Security...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 10, 2025

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 are products in the cybersecurity domain. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 appears to have a competitive edge due to its advanced features and real-time analytics.

Features: Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides cloud infrastructure visibility, compliance monitoring, and infrastructure protection. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers real-time threat detection, network monitoring, and machine learning-driven analytics for enhanced data insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers straightforward deployment with solid customer support suitable for cloud-dependent operations. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 involves a more complex deployment but provides comprehensive support and guidance to enhance user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers competitive pricing with satisfactory ROI for its cloud monitoring capabilities. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360, despite higher upfront costs, delivers significant ROI through advanced data analytics and security insights, justifying its pricing for comprehensive security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (19th), Container Security (30th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (24th)

Threat Stack Cloud Security...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Skyler Cain

Software Development Manager at Rent Dynamics

SecOps program for us, as a smaller company, is amazing; they know what to look for

They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter. Even as part of the SecOps Program, that could be helpful; a quick analysis. They're analyzing our whole infrastructure and saying, "You have one VPC and that doesn't make a lot of sense, that should be multiple VPCs and here's why." The architecture of the servers in whatever cloud-hosting provider you're on could be helpful. Other than that, they should continue to expand on their notifications and on what's a vulnerability. They do a great job of that and we want them to continue to do that. It would be cool, since the agent is already deployed and they know about the server, they know the IP address, and they know what vulnerability is there, for them to test the vulnerability and see if they can actually exploit it. Or, once we patch it, they could double-check that it can't be. I don't know how hard that would be to build. Thinking on it off the top off my head, it could be a little challenging but it could also be highly interesting. It would also be great if we could test a couple of other features like hammering a server with 100 login attempts and see what happens. Real test scenarios could be really helpful. That is probably more something close to what they do with the SOC 2 audit or the report. But more visualization of that, being able to test things out on our infrastructure to make sure we can or can't hit this box could be interesting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is scalable."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"An important feature of this solution is monitoring. Specifically, container monitoring."

"The most valuable feature is the SecOps because they have our back and they help us with the reports... It's like having an extension of your team. And then, it grows with you."

"The rules are really great. They give us more visibility and control over what's being triggered. There's a large set of rules that come out-of-the-box. We can customize them and we can create our own rules based on the traffic patterns that we see."

"Threat Stack has connectivity."

"The number-one feature is the monitoring of interactive sessions on our Linux machines. We run an immutable environment, so that nothing is allowed to be changed in production... We're constantly monitoring to make sure that no one is violating that. Threat Stack is what allows us to do that."

"It is scalable. It deploys easily with curl and yum."

"Every other security tool we've looked is good at containers, or at Kubernetes, is good at AWS, or at instance monitoring. But nobody is good at tying all of those things together, and that's really where Threat Stack shines."

"We like the ability of the host security module to monitor the processes running on our servers to help us monitor activity."

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] pros

Cons

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"There needs to be more support."

"The compliance and governance need improvement."

"The user interface can be a little bit clunky at times... There's a lot of information that needs to be waded through, and the UI just isn't great."

"The API - which has grown quite a bit, so we're still learning it and I can't say whether it still needs improvement - was an area that had been needing it."

"I would like further support of Windows endpoint agents or the introduction of support for Windows endpoint agents."

"Some features do not work as expected."

"It shoots back a lot of alerts."

"The solution’s ability to consume alerts and data in third-party tools (via APIs and export into S3 buckets) is moderate. They have some work to do in that area... The API does not mimic the features of the UI as far as reporting and pulling data out go. There's a big discrepancy there."

"They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter."

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

"Pricing seems to be in line with the market structure. It's fine."

"It is a cost-effective choice versus other solutions on the market."

"It came in cheaper than Trend Micro when we purchased it a few years ago."

"What we're paying now is somewhere around $15 to $20 per agent per month, if I recall correctly. The other cost we have is SecOps."

"I'm happy with the amount that we spend for the product that we get and the overall service that we get. It's not cheap, but I'm still happy with the spend."

"We find the licensing and pricing very easy to understand and a good value for the services provided."

"It is very expensive compared to some other products. The pricing is definitely high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

12%

University

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and resource investments for both parties. Instead, invest time in multiple demo sessi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 24% of the time

Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 15% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 14% of the time

Darktrace vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco IOS Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

July 2025

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

July 2025

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report

Download Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] product report

Also Known As

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Threat Stack, CSP,

Overview

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers robust security features including endpoint monitoring, rule customization, and integration capabilities, with easy connectivity to cloud services like Docker and AWS.

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides tools for enhancing security visibility across cloud infrastructure. It supports AWS and Docker integration, facilitating efficient threat detection and management. Users appreciate its capability to configure customizable alerts and monitor endpoints, sessions, API interactions, and cloud services. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as better serverless environment support and reduced alert frequency. The platform services smaller organizations by compensating for limited security resources with its comprehensive monitoring and auditing tools.

What are the key features?

Easy Cloud Service Integration: Streamlined connectivity with Docker and AWS for efficient monitoring.
Customizable Rule Sets: Tailor security rules to meet specific organizational needs.
Email Alerts: Receive timely notifications about security events and threats.
Interactive Session Monitoring: Track live sessions for suspicious activities.
API Integration: Connect effortlessly with third-party tools for an enhanced security posture.
SecOps Support: Assistance for organizations lacking dedicated security teams.

What are the benefits and ROI features?

Streamlined Threat Detection: Effective process monitoring to identify potential threats.
Cost Efficiency: Serves companies with limited resources by providing essential security functions.
Comprehensive Audits: Helps in regular examinations of cloud infrastructure, enhancing compliance.
Visibility into Cloud Operations: Offers a detailed dashboard for threat visibility and monthly vulnerability assessments.

In specific industries, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is utilized for its strength in monitoring cloud infrastructure and preventing unauthorized access. Organizations in fields where cloud operations are critical use it for regular audits and monitoring. Its capabilities in threat management are leveraged to maintain secure operations and compliance, especially where there is no dedicated security team.

Sample Customers

Wizards of the Coast

StatusPage.io, Walkbase, Spanning, DNAnexus, Jobcase, Nextcapital, Smartling, Veracode, 6sense

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Check Point Software Technologies, Fortinet and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS). Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors and best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.