Everlaw vs LAW PreDiscovery comparison

Everlaw and LexisNexis are both solutions in the eDiscovery category. Everlaw is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.7, while LexisNexis is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. Everlaw holds a 2.9% mindshare in eD, compared to LexisNexis’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Everlaw users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of LexisNexis users who would recommend it.

Everlaw

Read 3 Everlaw reviews

453 Views
390 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

LAW PreDiscovery

Read 2 LAW PreDiscovery reviews

333 Views
333 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Everlaw

LAW PreDiscovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

LAW PreDiscovery and Everlaw are competitors in the eDiscovery solutions category. Everlaw appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and overall value, effectively handling complex cases while LAW PreDiscovery remains a cost-effective option with solid customer support.

Features: LAW PreDiscovery is known for its reliable document processing, comprehensive tools for straightforward tasks, and cost-effectiveness. Everlaw offers predictive coding, advanced analytics, and comprehensive case management features, appealing to users managing intricate legal cases.

Room for Improvement: LAW PreDiscovery could enhance its handling speed, update some outdated features, and increase technological adoption. Everlaw could work on better integration with external tools, provide more customization options, and improve certain aspects of user interface flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LAW PreDiscovery provides a straightforward deployment process and robust customer support. Everlaw's cloud-based model simplifies deployment and its customer service is highly responsive, making it easy to manage scalability and ongoing support needs.

Pricing and ROI: LAW PreDiscovery is budget-friendly, offering satisfactory ROI for smaller projects. Everlaw, though pricier, is perceived to offer greater ROI with its advanced features, making it suitable for comprehensive eDiscovery requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Everlaw vs. LAW PreDiscovery Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Everlaw vs. LAW PreDiscovery

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Everlaw

Ranking in eDiscovery

9th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LAW PreDiscovery

Ranking in eDiscovery

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of Everlaw is 2.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LAW PreDiscovery is 1.6%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

eDiscovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Everlaw	2.9%
LAW PreDiscovery	1.6%
Other	95.5%

eDiscovery

Featured Reviews

Dawne Herbert

Project Manager, Litigation at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficient discovery workflows have supported fast reviews but ingestion of document families still needs work

Everlaw's best features include ease of ingestion, processing speed, processing metadata, metadata redactions, and seamless application of redactions on the native. The speed of processing makes the biggest difference in my day-to-day work because the faster we get data into a review system, the less time that we have down for projects. Everlaw has positively impacted my organization by offering an opportunity for an alternative to our current database management that we use for eDiscovery. It has a different aesthetic feel, and we use it primarily for shorter-lived cases.

Read full review

Brian Grossman

Director of Sales at Opveon Litigation Services LLC

A powerful tool for litigation support services, such as production processing to meet client requirements

LAW PreDiscovery can simplify its interface and offer a cloud-accessible version tailored to customers. We often use other cloud-based document review software alongside LAW PreDiscovery to meet specific needs. This interchangeability allows us to handle specialized export requests more effectively. There also needs to be a more straightforward process for upgrading licenses without contacting support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the tool specifically for unitization in many projects. It's very easy for reviewers to use. Everlaw is improving daily, introducing new features like analytics and AI. Analytics in Everlaw runs by default when we process anything. We used AI to train the system for review in a project with five million records."

"Customer support is phenomenal and is one of the most appealing factors with Everlaw."

"In Everlaw, you can add related items within a search to a search component, allowing you to build and expand your search incrementally. For example, you can start with an initial search, add related items, and then continue adding more related items to the entire search. Another thing about Everlaw is its speed. It loads quickly, whether it's images or documents."

"The sourcing and the detailed background checklist are the most valuable features of this solution."

"I've found the ability to customize exports and indexing in LAW PreDiscovery to be the most valuable feature. It allows us to meet our customers' specific needs effectively."

Cons

"Everlaw could be less choosy about accepting control numbers for third-party loads. When uploading third-party loads, it currently needs two mandatory fields (like within date or end date or page count). I think the control number should be the only required field. Everlaw isn't used for Data Breach projects. For normal eDiscovery, we can use Everlaw, but most clients prefer Relativity."

"Everlaw can be improved on ingestion by making the ingestion of family members more cohesive, as larger documents sometimes fall behind family members which may get processed earlier, causing some confusion for case teams."

"LAW PreDiscovery can simplify its interface and offer a cloud-accessible versiontailored to customers. We often use other cloud-based document review software alongside LAW PreDiscovery to meet specific needs. This interchangeability allows us to handle specialized export requests more effectively. There also needs to be a more straightforward process for upgrading licenses without contacting support."

"If these details, photos, dates of birth, and so on are not possible to include, I believe it would be much more efficient if multiple people could log in using the same email address, as we can in some other programs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is higher than that of other tools. Other tools offer bundle rates, but Everlaw charges per GB, which is more expensive. It doesn't charge for users; it only charges for hosting."

"LAW PreDiscovery licenses are pretty costly and are on a yearly subscription basis. Before committing to LAW, it's crucial to calculate and ensure that you'll see a return on investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

30%

Healthcare Company

13%

Legal Firm

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Everlaw?

The tool's pricing is higher than that of other tools. Other tools offer bundle rates, but Everlaw charges per GB, which is more expensive. It doesn't charge for users; it only charges for hosting.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Everlaw?

Everlaw can be improved on ingestion by making the ingestion of family members more cohesive, as larger documents sometimes fall behind family members which may get processed earlier, causing some ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Everlaw?

My main use case for Everlaw is eDiscovery project management. A specific example of how I use Everlaw for eDiscovery project management is that we take client data in its raw format, have it proce...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LAW PreDiscovery?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LAW PreDiscovery?

We primarily use LAW PreDiscovery for litigation support services, such as production processing, importing native files, converting PDFs, bate numbering, batch printing trial exhibits, and archiva...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LAW PreDiscovery?

If you're a more prominent law firm or a litigation support vendor dealing with extensive document processing, LAW PreDiscovery could be a good fit. However, for smaller companies or law firms need...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Everlaw

Compared 33% of the time

Relativity vs Everlaw

Compared 33% of the time

kCura Relativity vs Everlaw

Compared 21% of the time

Google Vault vs Everlaw

Compared 12% of the time

More Everlaw Competitors

Nuix eDiscovery vs LAW PreDiscovery

Compared 37% of the time

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs LAW PreDiscovery

Compared 32% of the time

IPRO vs LAW PreDiscovery

Compared 32% of the time

More LAW PreDiscovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

eDiscovery

January 2026

Download Everlaw product report

Buyer's Guide

eDiscovery

January 2026

Download LAW PreDiscovery product report

Overview

Everlaw is thoughtfully architected to be the fastest, most powerful, and easiest ediscovery solution on the market. We bring the superior software experiences you’re used to in your consumer life — the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it speed of Google and the blissful usability of Apple products — to your litigation toolkit.

Everlaw

LAW PreDiscovery software works as an all-in-one "eDiscovery engine" to scan, import, and produce all of the potential evidentiary documents needed during legal discovery. LexisNexis LAW PreDiscovery leads the way in document production, including the most flexible imaging and endorsing capabilities. Hundreds of file types exports directly to Concordance software and other leading document review platforms in a wide range of formats and Identifies and extracts content from file types, scan documents from scanners, and produce printed or digital output. LAW PreDiscovery handles even the largest imaging, endorsing, OCR, or print jobs by just adding additional workstations.

LexisNexis

Sample Customers

Trusted by 8 of the top 10 class action law firms and over 65% of state attorneys general

Murphy & King, BDO Consulting, Beasley Allen

Buyer's Guide

Everlaw vs. LAW PreDiscovery

December 2025

Free Report: Everlaw vs. LAW PreDiscovery

Find out what your peers are saying about Everlaw vs. LAW PreDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Everlaw vs. LAW PreDiscovery report.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.