Elastic Search vs Pinecone comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Elastic Logo
1,711 views|560 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Pinecone Logo
708 views|691 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Elastic Search and Pinecone based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Meta, Chroma and others in Vector Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed Vector Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution has good security features. I have been happy with the dashboards and interface.""The solution has great scalability.""The solution is valuable for log analytics.""The AI-based attribute tagging is a valuable feature.""The most valuable feature is the out of the box Kibana.""Search is really powerful.""The observability is the best available because it provides granular insights that identify reasons for defects.""The UI is very nice, and performance wise it's quite good too."

More Elastic Search Pros →

"The most valuable features of the solution are similarity search and maximal marginal relevance search for retrieval purposes.""We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases."

More Pinecone Pros →

Cons
"There is a lack of technical people to develop, implement and optimize equipment operation and web queries.""It needs email notification, similar to what Logentries has. Because of the notification issue, we moved to Logentries, as it provides a simple way to receive notification whenever a server encounters an error or unexpected conditions (which we have defined using RegEx​).""Something that could be improved is better integrations with Cortex and QRadar, for example.""We'd like to see more integration in the future, especially around service desks or other ITSM tools.""They could improve some of the platform's infrastructure management capabilities.""Could have more open source tools and testing.""The GUI is the part of the program which has the most room for improvement.""Its licensing needs to be improved. They don't offer a perpetual license. They want to know how many nodes you will be using, and they ask for an annual subscription. Otherwise, they don't give you permission to use it. Our customers are generally military or police departments or customers without connection to the internet. Therefore, this model is not suitable for us. This subscription-based model is not the best for OEM vendors. Another annoying thing about Elasticsearch is its roadmap. We are developing something, and then they say, "Okay. We have removed that feature in this release," and when we are adapting to that release, they say, "Okay. We have removed that one as well." We don't know what they will remove in the next version. They are not looking for backward compatibility from the customers' perspective. They just remove a feature and say, "Okay. We've removed this one." In terms of new features, it should have an ODBC driver so that you can search and integrate this product with existing BI tools and reporting tools. Currently, you need to go for third parties, such as CData, in order to achieve this. ODBC driver is the most important feature required. Its Community Edition does not have security features. For example, you cannot authenticate with a username and password. It should have security features. They might have put it in the latest release."

More Elastic Search Cons →

"The product fails to offer a serverless type of storage capacity.""Onboarding could be better and smoother."

More Pinecone Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Top Answer:We chose Pinecone because it covers most of the use cases.
    Top Answer:Onboarding could be better and smoother. Navigation is difficult because most of us rely on watching tutorials on YouTube to understand how to use this software. The onboarding journey should explain… more »
    Top Answer:We've been building an ERP dashboard using generative UI. We needed a vector database to retrieve and implement augmentation, so we opted to use Pinecone. We chose Pinecone because it covers most of… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    1,711
    Comparisons
    560
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    8.3
    5th
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    708
    Comparisons
    691
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    496
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Faiss logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Milvus logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    OpenText IDOL logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    OpenSearch logo
    Compared 37% of the time.
    Faiss logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    Qdrant logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Redis logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    LanceDB logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    Pinecone is a powerful tool for efficiently storing and retrieving vector embeddings. It is highly praised for its scalability, speed, and ease of integration with existing workflows. 

    Users find it particularly useful for similarity search, recommendation systems, and natural language processing. 

    Its efficient search capabilities, seamless integration with existing systems, and ability to handle large-scale datasets make it a valuable tool for data analysis and retrieval.

    Sample Customers
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    1. Airbnb 2. DoorDash 3. Instacart 4. Lyft 5. Pinterest 6. Reddit 7. Slack 8. Snapchat 9. Spotify 10. TikTok 11. Twitter 12. Uber 13. Zoom 14. Adobe 15. Amazon 16. Apple 17. Facebook 18. Google 19. IBM 20. Microsoft 21. Netflix 22. Salesforce 23. Shopify 24. Square 25. Tesla 26. TikTok 27. Twitch 28. Uber Eats 29. WhatsApp 30. Yelp 31. Zillow 32. Zynga
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Educational Organization9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vector Databases
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Meta, Chroma and others in Vector Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Vector Databases with 59 reviews while Pinecone is ranked 5th in Vector Databases with 2 reviews. Elastic Search is rated 8.2, while Pinecone is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pinecone writes "A reliable cloud solution for building an ERP dashboard". Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Azure Search, Amazon Kendra and OpenText IDOL, whereas Pinecone is most compared with OpenSearch, Faiss, Qdrant, Redis and LanceDB.

    See our list of best Vector Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Vector Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.