Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) vs Sharepoint 2016 Standard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearc...
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (9th)
Sharepoint 2016 Standard
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (15th)
 

Featured Reviews

William Au - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized log data has improved issue resolution and reduced operational costs
One of the better features of Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) is Lucene Search, which gives our users the ability to search through the mountains of logs without giving them direct access to production systems. Another great feature is Index Lifecycle Management that allows us to move data to cheaper storage tiers as our data ages out. The feature that we love the best is LogsDB, which allows us to index our data differently so that it doesn't accumulate as much storage in our hot tier and allows us to ship many of those logs, especially older logs to cheaper storage such as S3. Elastic Cloud (Elasticsearch Service) has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to move away from expensive services such as DataDog and gives us about the same level of service while allowing us to keep data for a longer period of time at a cheaper price.
LG
Integration of diverse AI functions and adaptable features provides efficient operational solutions
From a client's perspective, I encounter several challenges when implementing new systems, and in my last role, they faced significant issues with their previous software. After assessing their situation, it was clear that continuing on their current path would lead to excessive costs. Recognizing that Sharepoint 2016 Standard could fulfill their needs efficiently, I engaged my team, and after seven months, we had a fully operational system in place. As a project manager, I design what I need from AI within Sharepoint 2016 Standard, knowing I always get good results. While the technical details may not be my forte, I have a network of strong experts working alongside me, making sure our processes succeed according to the plans I put in place.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
Pricing for Sharepoint 2016 Standard, in my view, is favorable, as it is based on the days of person-hours worked. In contrast, while attempting to implement another documentation system, the costs...
What needs improvement with Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
This is something that people who have deeper knowledge about the tool should contribute to regarding what should be improved. I am just an end-user of some tools created and designed using Sharepo...
What is your primary use case for Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
The experience with Sharepoint 2016 Standard involves using it to adjust and design some applications to create tools for controlling our production line and processes. We use Sharepoint 2016 Stand...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Information not available
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Luigi's Box, Lucidworks and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: September 2025.
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.