Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Docker vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Docker
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Development Platforms (1st), Container Management (5th)
JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (32nd), DevSecOps (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of Docker is 2.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is 0.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Supply Chain Security
 

Featured Reviews

Gur Sannikov - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers reliability and helps to save on costs
In terms of the impact of container orchestration, I would say that though my company does not currently use a lot of containers, we plan to move to containers. I recommend others to just use the internet than ChatGPT since mostly all issues are already known and very easy to deal with so it is better to use the knowledge from the industry. In terms of the use of Docker for AI projects or workflows, I would say that my company deploys AI applications on Docker, like any other application and pipeline. The tools or practices that have proven to be the most beneficial for our company's AI initiatives are agnostic to Docker. There is nothing special in Docker, and our company just uses it to deploy applications. The value derived from the use of the product revolves around the scalability and the reliability it offers. The product helps with the cost-savings part since it saves time and money linked with the amount of engineers required to spend time on operations. I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Fredierick Saladas - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides superior integration options and comprehensive reporting features
The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options. Improved support for mobile devices would also be advantageous, allowing team members to access the system more effectively while on the go. In the next release, we would like to see advanced analytics features, including predictive analytics to help forecast project outcomes. Additionally, a more robust mobile app with offline capabilities would be valuable for remote work scenarios.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We find the auto scaling and auto healing functionality of this solution very good."
"Docker creates lightweight applications that are easy to manage and scale."
"Docker allows you to run multiple virtual machines independently."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the Dockerfile, which makes the life of developers easy. Developers get a real understanding of container creation."
"I think that with Docker, it is easy to deploy it on different platforms."
"The solution offers speed and flexibility."
"There are ways of using Docker where you have absolutely no dependencies on the environment that you work in. This allows us to deploy Docker anywhere anytime and this has been most valuable."
"Docker's containerization property is its main selling point."
"The most valuable features include task tracking and reporting capabilities."
"They have a professional service team that works alongside their engineering and performance teams."
"I appreciate the features in JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, especially the efficient file management where downloads and uploads are optimized, saving time. The storage efficiency is also great as it avoids redundancy, which is crucial for our team. It is also quite easy to use, especially for basic commands through the command line. It's straightforward for us internally, and our data is well-hosted on their servers, which makes data location and querying fast and efficient. Moving our storage to JFrog has streamlined our development cycle by eliminating duplicated data, which previously took up extra space locally. This efficiency is crucial for our workflow, although network speeds still play a significant role in performance."
 

Cons

"The solution could improve with a GUI instead of only a command line interface. Having to use the command line interface can be a hassle."
"They should provide proper documentation to understand the solution's cgroup process."
"Docker can improve the integration with Microsoft Windows. It does not support native installations."
"The vendor should release a monitoring tool or include monitoring capabilities in Docker"
"It could be easier to create images and save them on reports. Just improved development workflow, just quicker, like some better user experience creating the images for the Docker containers."
"In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved."
"There may not be much room for improvement with Docker as it has greatly evolved. However, one area that could be improved upon is the documentation on their website which was once easy to follow but has become quite terrible with numerous versions being released. As an example, the installation process for Docker now requires more than just a one-line command, causing inconvenience. Additionally, based on my experience as a college instructor, teaching students to install Docker was a difficult task due to the lack of straightforward and easy-to-follow documentation. Docker should focus on improving their documentation to make it more user-friendly for all."
"We'd like knowledge transfer to be easier."
"We have encountered stability issues lately, particularly with frequent 500 internal server errors. Despite efforts from our DevOps team to adjust settings, these issues persist, affecting our workflow, especially with machine learning data uploads. Overall, while it's beneficial for storage and accessibility, stability issues need improvement for seamless operations. The occasional occurrence of internal server errors takes several minutes to resolve on their own and can disrupt workflows. Another concern is that sometimes files appear to be successfully uploaded, but then they cannot be downloaded, with no error message indicating the issue during the upload process. This inconsistency needs to be addressed by JFrog to ensure reliable functionality for users like us."
"Our locations are in different environments, so the remote server takes time to catch up, causing replication delays. The engineering team suggested that this issue would be resolved, but I'm not sure if it has been addressed yet. This is more of a feature enhancement that we suggested."
"The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The current cost for us is nothing as an open source."
"Docker is a free-to-use solution. However, Docker Enterprise is not free."
"We use the open-source version."
"Customers pay for the license through a yearly subscription model, where they pay per license. This means that the license is based on a subscription, and the customer pays annually for each license they use."
"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
"I use the solution's open-source version."
"Docker is a free open-source solution."
"Docker is a free open-source solution. However, there is the Docker Enterprise which is a paid solution."
"The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts."
"Regarding pricing, I focus on the platform's interface and user communication rather than costs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Docker?
We are using Docker to host applications.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?
Regarding the cost, Mirantis Container Cloud is cheaper than other solutions like Red Hat. The license costs around 10,000 Indian rupees per year.
What needs improvement with Docker?
Mirantis Container Cloud should have AI integration tools, which are not available right now. These tools should assist in app scalability and deployment error handling.
What needs improvement with JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?
The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options. Improved support for mobile devices would also be advantageous,...
What advice do you have for others considering JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?
Overall, the solution has been a great asset to our team. I advise investing time in the initial setup and training to leverage its capabilities fully. Ensure you clearly understand your needs and ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?
The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts. Licensing options are flexible, but ensure you understand the terms and any additional costs ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Docker vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.