Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox are key competitors in the endpoint protection sector. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is more favorable for easy integration and usability in Windows environments, while CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox is better recognized for advanced threat analysis and intelligence features.
Features: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers seamless integration with Windows ecosystems, powerful real-time protection, and centralized management capabilities. CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox provides advanced threat detection through detailed analysis, comprehensive reporting, and robust behavioral analysis.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could benefit from enhanced cross-platform support, more robust threat intelligence features, and a reduction in system resource usage. CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox might improve by simplifying its deployment process, reducing upfront costs, and providing more user-friendly interfaces.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is known for quick and easy deployment, particularly in Windows setups, and offers reliable customer support. CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox, although sometimes challenging to deploy, provides excellent customer service with responsive support and comprehensive resources.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is generally considered cost-effective with lower initial costs and a quick return on investment, especially for businesses within the Microsoft ecosystem. CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox requires more significant upfront investment but offers considerable long-term security advantages and ROI through its advanced features and detailed threat analysis.
Without detection and protection measures, organizations would face substantial payments and reputational damage, including the necessity to inform customers about data breaches, potentially leading to loss of business.
We have seen a return on investment when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it saves labor by reducing the need for staff to focus on it.
The biggest return on investment for me when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is the time saving.
They respond within two hours after I raise a support ticket.
We repeatedly ask them to collect logs and analyze them before providing a solution via email.
The level-one support seems disconnected from subject matter experts.
I rate Microsoft support 10 out of 10.
Due to our size, we don't have access to direct technical support, but the knowledge base, Microsoft Learn, and the articles available are really good.
We managed to scale it out in a short amount of time, with two months of planning and three months of implementation on 10,000 computers.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is scalable enough to handle various devices across environments, whether they are laptops, Android devices, or operating in hybrid environments.
Compatibility is its main feature.
I haven't seen any outages with Microsoft.
I rate Defender 10 out of 10 for stability.
Defender for Endpoint is extremely stable.
While CrowdStrike is a powerful tool, the user interface is cluttered with many features, making it challenging to navigate.
When we push the agent from CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox for mass deployment, the agent is not properly installed on the user end, leading to communication issues and agent corruption.
Repeated interactions are necessary due to Level One's lack of tools and knowledge, hindering efficient problem-solving and negatively impacting our experience with Microsoft support.
In contrast, competing products offer reduced pricing for long-term commitments, which makes it difficult for us in that environment.
We use Microsoft partners to help govern the platform, and as part of an alliance, we want to gather data from each tenant and combine them for a complete view.
Pricing is based on the number of endpoints and the features I need, operating on a usage-based cost structure.
I think it can be expensive, but it depends on the products.
Given our extensive Microsoft licensing, transitioning to Defender for Endpoint did not affect licensing costs.
It costs $15 per VM for the P2 plan, which is seen as affordable for customers.
The pricing, setup, and licensing were very easy and simple.
One of the key features is its policy-based notifications, which alert us to unauthorized actions.
I find the notifications and alerts received from CrowdStrike server to be invaluable.
The advantages of CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox are if Falcon does not detect, it automatically sandboxes unknown detections and provides us with signatures to mitigate those detections.
Defender for Endpoint's coverage across different platforms in our environment is pretty good. We have devices running Linux, Mac OS, Windows, iOS, and Android. It covers all of them.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a unified management interface allowing customers to manage their on-premises and hybrid infrastructures from a single pane.
One of the best features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is its database for identifying zero-day attacks or malware attacks.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 13.7% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox | 1.3% |
| Other | 85.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 79 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
| Large Enterprise | 87 |
CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox detects threats without impacting endpoint performance, providing users with a seamless experience. It delivers detailed reports for collaboration and offers malware analysis capabilities, identifying potential breaches and suspicious files.
CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox is designed for threat detection, offering a comprehensive approach to identifying hidden malicious programs and analyzing harmful URLs. Its integration allows for seamless evaluation of files and sandboxing of email links and attachments, supporting threat detection and response. Users value its capabilities in network connection recording, metadata analysis, and threat ratings, although some express a need for MacOS and Windows 11 support and improved SOAR integration.
What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox?CrowdStrike Falcon Sandbox is implemented by organizations to strengthen security across email systems and endpoint devices. It is particularly valuable in industries needing thorough threat investigations and rapid responses to potentially harmful content, empowering users with essential threat intelligence.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for organizations. It offers real-time protection against various types of cyber threats, including malware, viruses, ransomware, and phishing attacks.
With its powerful machine-learning capabilities, it can detect and block sophisticated attacks before they can cause any harm. The solution also includes endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities, allowing organizations to quickly investigate and respond to security incidents. It provides detailed insights into the attack timeline, enabling security teams to understand the scope and impact of an incident.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also offers proactive threat hunting, allowing organizations to proactively search for and identify potential threats within their network. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft security solutions, such as Microsoft Defender XDR, to provide a unified and holistic security approach. With its centralized management console, organizations can easily deploy, configure, and monitor the security solution across their entire network.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a robust and scalable security solution that helps organizations protect their endpoints and data from evolving cyber threats.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
