Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Conga Sign vs Nintex eSign comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Conga Sign
Ranking in eSignature (Electronic Signature)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nintex eSign
Ranking in eSignature (Electronic Signature)
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the eSignature (Electronic Signature) category, the mindshare of Conga Sign is 1.2%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex eSign is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eSignature (Electronic Signature)
 

Featured Reviews

Samy Saied - PeerSpot reviewer
Advanced functionalities have allowed us to streamline our document management processes
The most valuable feature is Conga’s advanced set of functionalities, which have developed over time, especially from Salesforce Classic to Lightning. Features like Conga Sign and enhancing documentation for business users have significantly improved our processes. It also provides flexibility, allowing for easy interaction with just a click of a button.
Todd Blake - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution that provides businesses the ability to create and secure documents whenever needed
The administrative user interface used to create users and track templates and envelopes for our product is outdated. Now we're on the AssureSign side and not the Nintex side, so I don't know if they are different products. If Nintex AssureSign is one product, then they have given it an outdated feel and look. If I had more experience with other similar programs, like DocuSign, that I used years ago, I might have been able to give more concrete or better feedback on what additional features are to be included in the tool.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature in terms of configuration is the Write Back functionality."
"The most valuable feature is Conga’s advanced set of functionalities, which have developed over time, especially from Salesforce Classic to Lightning."
"Customers can use Conga Sign to drag and drop their signatures on documents."
"It integrates seamlessly with Conga Composer, making it simpler than if we had to connect Conga with DocuSign."
"The most valuable aspect of Conga Sign is its tight integration with the Salesforce ecosystem."
"The solution allows you to create a code for securing documents and provides various permissions, such as signature only, view only, and read-only."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I rate the technical support a ten out of ten because they really help us."
 

Cons

"Sometimes, the tool creates an issue, and we have to go to the Conga Sign setup and reconnect it again."
"There is room for improvement in ensuring data residency compliance, as some clients express concerns about data processing transitioning to other servers."
"The integration of Conga Sign with Conga Composer could be better."
"The solution accepts only a few data types and not all data types."
"The documentation for Conga Sign could be improved."
"I would like to see better initial setup assistance and improved documentation, which would make it easier for new users to understand and configure the solution."
"The solution's initial setup process was a bit complex…The administrative user interface used to create users and track templates and envelopes for our product is outdated."
"Currently, merge mapping can only be done within a specific object. If we want to do a merge mapping for related objects, we need to create a lot of automation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"AssureSign offers comfortable prices that are more affordable for clients. This is why many clients are attracted to AssureSign, as it is a cost-effective tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eSignature (Electronic Signature) solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Conga Sign?
If there was the ability to have some kind of warning or alert for sales reps, indicating that a contract is already out for signature before they send a second one, it would greatly reduce confusi...
What is your primary use case for Conga Sign?
We primarily use Conga Sign through our Salesforce integration when we send out contracts for sales. A small percentage, about one percent of our usage, is for internal purposes where we send docum...
What advice do you have for others considering Conga Sign?
I would recommend Conga Sign, especially for mid to small-sized organizations. If a company works around the firewall blocking issue, it is scalable and great to have both the composer and e-signat...
What do you like most about Nintex AssureSign?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What needs improvement with Nintex AssureSign?
The administrative user interface used to create users and track templates and envelopes for our product is outdated. Now we're on the AssureSign side and not the Nintex side, so I don't know if th...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Nintex AssureSign
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oodle Car Finance, InZone Industries, Allianz Care, Brightpearl
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Conga Sign vs. Nintex eSign and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.