CloverETL vs Informatica PowerExchange comparison

Javlin and Informatica are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #65, while Informatica is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. Javlin holds a 0.2% mindshare in DI, compared to Informatica’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Informatica users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

200 Views
159 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Informatica PowerExchange

Read 23 Informatica PowerExchange reviews

1,554 Views
1,154 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

CloverETL

Informatica PowerExchange

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 13, 2025

Informatica PowerExchange and CloverETL compete in the data integration field. CloverETL might have a slight advantage due to its flexibility and scalability.

Features: Informatica PowerExchange offers robust integration capabilities, supporting real-time and batch processing, and a comprehensive approach. CloverETL provides customizable design, versatility, and flexibility for highly adaptable solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloverETL offers a straightforward deployment model, highly valued for its simplicity. Informatica PowerExchange provides an extensive support system but can be more complex to implement.

Pricing and ROI: Informatica PowerExchange involves a higher initial setup cost but offers long-term value. CloverETL is more budget-friendly, appealing to businesses looking for a cost-effective solution.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. Informatica PowerExchange Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Informatica PowerExchange

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

65th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (47th)

Informatica PowerExchange

Ranking in Data Integration

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Informatica PowerExchange is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user854766

Vice President, Information and Technology Services at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors

* Familiar, intuitive GUI (Eclipse plug-in) coming from a Java development background. * In-depth, descriptive, and well-laid-out documentation. * Responsive support through forums, even directly from Clover staff. * Wealth of pre-defined components. * All components are customizable. * Descriptive logging, especially for error messages. * Ease of install/light footprint.

Read full review

Mohammad Faizan Ahmad

Sr. Technical Engineer at Investcorp Bank BSC

Helpful in handling areas like complex data sources and data processing but needs improved support services

The major challenge with the tool stems from the fact that if you are implementing it in the cloud, then it has to be within the framework. Another challenge is the large volume of data. Informatica PowerExchange is a product through which we enable connectivity, so it is not an application product or a stand-alone tool, but Informatica's core systems or IICS uses it to connect to multiple systems. The major challenge associated with the tool is on the infrastructure side. The tool's features could be something faster with more connectors. A number of connectors can help connect to a wide variety of applications. The tool should focus on reducing the resilient time, like, if any network disconnectivity happens, then auto-reconnection and the retry method should be more robust so that manual intervention is not required. We communicate with the tool's support team as we need to raise our issues with them. I have already worked with Informatica and have a total experience of around eight to nine years; the one problem with the tool is its support team since they take a lot of time to address a particular issue. If one time you schedule a call and explain the situation to them about the issue, the support team will raise tickets and take notes. They will ask you to share the logs or screenshots of the errors, and you will get no resolution. The support team will randomly give you some documents and expect you to go through them, and if you get back to them with questions, a new person will be allocated, and you will have to start explaining everything again. I would not say it is a pleasant experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"The product's initial setup phase was not complex. The tool is easy to install onto any of the servers, and you can integrate it."

"Mainstream integration and real-time integration are the best features."

"The product’s flexibility is valuable."

"The data transformation is the solution's most valuable feature."

"In terms of the return on investment, the tool is very helpful in the digital transformation process since multiple systems are available."

"Overall, it's a good tool. It's currently number one on the market. It pretty much has all the necessary capabilities to pull the incremental data from the source system, technically speaking."

"Provides a significant amount of control over the landscape and overall implementation."

"It is a scalable and versatile solution."

More Informatica PowerExchange pros

Cons

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"The major shortcoming of PowerExchange is high availability and failover. None of the versions we've used to date have had the out-of-the-box ability to enable failover and high-availability requirements. This is a significant challenge and risk."

"It would be helpful to have more metadata provided, which is useful for engaging more users in data exchange."

"Pushdown optimization could be improved."

"The major challenge associated with the tool is on the infrastructure side."

"I have minimal exposure to PowerExchange at this point."

"The connectivity with T24 core banking could be improved."

"I would like to have easier integration with cloud platforms."

"The product is not suitable for application integration."

More Informatica PowerExchange cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing cost of the product. It is an expensive product."

"Many users don't prefer to use the product, considering the high costs attached to the licensing part of the solution."

"It's expensive. In fact, nobody would buy any product of Informatica if the price was the only consideration. It costs money, and it doesn't come cheap, but it provides value for money in many ways."

"The cost of PowerExchange is reasonable. It does not rely on complicated formulas or unrealistic equations. The pricing model is straightforward. There is one component, and real-time integration is included. Some other solutions require purchasing additional modules or third-party plugins for this capability."

"The product is not very expensive."

"An annual package license fee is required."

"There are licensing and connector costs. Basically, Informatica is pay-as-you-use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Informatica PowerExchange?

The product’s flexibility is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Informatica PowerExchange?

The pricing and cost depend heavily on SAP's licensing structure, especially if using SAP integration services. Informatica is seen as broader in integrations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Informatica PowerExchange?

One area that could be improved is performance, as PowerExchange sometimes has less performance compared to native connectors when dealing with a huge volume of data. Additionally, the tool faces t...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Informatica PowerCenter vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 68% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Informatica PowerExchange

Compared 4% of the time

More Informatica PowerExchange Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2025

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

Informatica PowerExchange

April 2025

Download Informatica PowerExchange product report

Also Known As

No data available

PowerExchange, Connectors

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

Informatica PowerExchange Connectors provides high performance, out-of-the-box connectivity without having to develop custom data access programs.

Informatica

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

ACH Food, BNSF Railway Company, Illinois State University

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Informatica PowerExchange

April 2025

Free Report: CloverETL vs. Informatica PowerExchange

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. Informatica PowerExchange and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. Informatica PowerExchange report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.