CloudSphere vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

CloudSphere and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. CloudSphere is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while NetApp is ranked #24. CloudSphere holds a 3.0% mindshare in CM, compared to NetApp’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudSphere users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

CloudSphere

Read 6 CloudSphere reviews

2,530 Views
683 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Read 3 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reviews

1,952 Views
586 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudSphere

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

CloudSphere and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud are distinct cloud services in the cloud management sector. CloudSphere is favored for its competitive pricing and support options, while NetApp's rich feature set attracts users prioritizing functionality.

Features: CloudSphere provides comprehensive cloud governance and cost optimization support, enhancing security compliance monitoring. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud offers robust data management and high-performance storage, with seamless integration into Google Cloud's ecosystem, making it suitable for data-intensive operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudSphere is characterized by straightforward deployment processes using intuitive tools for rapid implementation and effective workload management. NetApp features a detailed deployment model tailored for enterprise scales with extensive customer support resources and documentation, offering an advantage in complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: CloudSphere stands out with its cost-effectiveness, demonstrating significant ROI through efficient cloud management and reduced operational costs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service demands a higher initial investment but offsets it with scalable architecture, delivering long-term returns for data-centric enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudSphere vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudSphere

Ranking in Cloud Migration

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (28th)

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Ranking in Cloud Migration

24th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (19th), Public Cloud Storage Services (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of CloudSphere is 3.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is 2.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudSphere	3.0%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud	2.6%
Other	94.4%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Asad-Ali

Dev Ops Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Cloud security assessments have improved cost control and vulnerability management across clients

The alerting system could be explored further, as it would help users integrate the alerting system more effectively. Additionally, an AI feature would be beneficial, as AI is prevalent nowadays and could integrate into environments to help customers. I would particularly like to see the AI feature added to CloudSphere so it automatically integrates into our environment and generates comprehensive reports, which would decrease workload from the engineer's perspective. If CloudSphere integrates AI and guides users on which security compliance they need to follow, AI could automatically scan everything and provide a report stating which areas need improvement and what points require attention.

Read full review

Colin Constable

Co-Founder at Atsign

Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time

NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability of the solution is a godsend."

"To others, if a company is looking for a security vulnerability tool or governance and policy tools that help improve their environment, I would recommend CloudSphere because it is very helpful, easy to use, user interactive, and provides many functions and features."

"We do not need to install any appliances or any agents."

"CloudSphere is very mature and very effective."

"The product is helpful for the management, optimization, and utilization of resources."

"Provides multiple kinds of services for managing the clouds of multiple customers."

"CloudSphere is a good solution that works well and can integrate with multiple clouds and manage all our customers."

"For the customers I work with, it provides flexibility as far as storage is concerned, so it's security and access."

More CloudSphere pros

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero."

"Overall, they have very impressive technologies."

"In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently."

"It is a good service for high availability that is very easy to configure."

"High availability is very important to us because we have a production environment. High availability is the highest priority for us to continue keeping our systems running."

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero. I was personally running all the infrastructure for the company. Now that we've moved to NetApp, I don't have to worry about making sure it's up and running. It's made my life personally much better."

Cons

"When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera."

"The solution must have a single management console for the resources and VMs."

"The next feature I would like to have full disclosure of what's being done with the data."

"Their customer support leaves a lot to be desired. The standards are not that great."

"The alerting system could be explored further, as it would help users integrate the alerting system more effectively."

"One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running."

"CloudSphere is not keeping up with the pace of the cloud and there are a number of services that can't be deployed using CloudSphere."

"The main issue I experienced from CloudSphere was recently resolved, but an area for improvement in the solution is that it lacks the functionality of migrating resources from one public cloud to another. If CloudSphere could provide that functionality, that would be very beneficial to users and companies."

"The user interface has room for improvement."

"The user interface has room for improvement. We would like this service to be more integrated with Azure, which is very easy to manage and use. It was easy to create volumes and add capacity pools in Azure, but in Google Cloud, we can only create separate volumes. We need more management or configuration options in the user interface."

"I would like for the sales team to get in contact more often and let me know what I should be doing next, what we should be doing about new features. So it would be nice if I heard a little bit more from him. From a technology perspective, I have no complaints."

"It would help if they increased the area in which they employ artificial intelligence, by starting to do assessments on the environments, to project those. They're not using any AI tools, currently, on the administrative side."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is very expensive."

"It depends on how that model will be used. It might be anywhere between $4 and $15 per license per month. It’s less expensive than other options."

"We don't need so much space, and there is no option to pay as we go or use just what we need. Also, the only way to increase performance is by increasing the level of the service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for CloudSphere?

My company relies on security assessments and vulnerabilities in our cloud environment in Azure, so we scan using CloudSphere. We work in MSP and Azure MSP with multiple clients, using two tools: P...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudSphere?

To others, if a company is looking for a security vulnerability tool or governance and policy tools that help improve their environment, I would recommend CloudSphere because it is very helpful, ea...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudSphere?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Densify vs CloudSphere

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudSphere

Compared 8% of the time

Skytap Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 6% of the time

NTT Cloud Management Platform vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

Connectria IaaS Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudSphere Competitors

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere

August 2026

Download CloudSphere product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud product report

Also Known As

HyperCloud

CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP

Overview

CloudSphere offers a unique multi-cloud management solution with features like attack path analysis, cost management, and predictive insights designed to enhance infrastructure reliability.

Providing an agent-less SaaS-based discovery tool, CloudSphere simplifies multi-cloud management with its single-pane interface, ensuring seamless data access in hybrid cloud environments. Its predictive insights and improved infrastructure reliability are valuable for both development and operational teams. However, it could improve in application management, real-time monitoring, and resource migration across clouds. Issues like inefficient large server scans and limitations in CI/CD integration and application discovery can be hindrances for some users.

What are CloudSphere's key features?

Attack Path Analysis: Identifies vulnerabilities to improve security.
Cost Management: Optimizes spending across cloud platforms.
Resource Optimization: Enhances operational efficiency using predictive insights.
Asset Discovery: Agent-less discovery tool assists in managing cloud resources.
Multi-Cloud Management: Single-pane interface aids in auditing and resource utilization.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Infrastructure Reliability: Predictive insights boost stability.
Improved Collaboration: Single-pane interface supports cross-cloud operations.
Risk Management: Attack path analytics bolster security measures.
Operational Efficiency: Cost management features refine cloud spending.

CloudSphere is widely used in DevOps to manage test development networks, monitor application behaviors, and assess risk levels. Ideal for those managing inventories across public clouds, it's found in hyper-converged infrastructures in industries like healthcare, supporting hospital management and integrated services.

CloudSphere

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud provides a managed, high-performance storage solution designed for enterprise workloads and complex data environments, ensuring seamless integration with Google Cloud.

It offers enterprises an efficient way to manage storage needs in Google Cloud, with features focused on high performance, ease of use, and robust data management. This service facilitates quick deployment, reliability, and data protection, allowing organizations to focus on operational efficiency without the complexities of traditional infrastructure.

What are the most important features?

High Performance: Delivers consistent, scalable performance for demanding applications.
Ease of Use: Simplified management and deployment reduce administrative overhead.
Data Protection: Includes built-in snapshots and replication for data integrity and disaster recovery.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Google Cloud services for streamlined workflows.
Scalability: Easily scales with business growth, providing storage on demand.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Optimizes storage costs with automated tiering and flexible pricing models.
Enhanced Productivity: Reduces time spent on storage management, allowing teams to focus on core tasks.
Reliability: Provides a dependable infrastructure with high uptime and data availability.
Agility: Enables rapid adaptation to changing business needs with quick scalability.

In industries like finance and healthcare, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is implemented to ensure secure data handling and regulatory compliance. Its capabilities in data protection and rapid scaling are particularly valuable in these sectors, where data integrity and fast access are priorities.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Affymetrix, Bell Helicopter, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, Porterville Unified School District, Interact for Health, VirtueCom, Warren Memorial Hospital, Front Porch, RMH Group, Meyers Nave, Intraworks, Information Technology, ETTE, Clackamas Community College

Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

Free Report: CloudSphere vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudSphere vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudSphere vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.