Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB compete in the big data and cloud database market. Cosmos DB has the upper hand due to its scalability and seamless cloud integration.
Features: Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop offers tools like Cloudera Manager for administration, Impala for data querying, and enterprise-level security features. In contrast, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB provides scalability, a globally distributed database, and seamless integration with Azure products. Its autoscaling and multi-model database support are standout features.
Room for Improvement: Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop faces scalability and performance issues, struggles with its complex setup, and has limited support for technologies like SparkR. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB needs better integration with other data sources, improved cost optimization, and enhanced documentation for cross-partition queries.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is complex with its on-premises or hybrid deployments and inconsistent technical support. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB simplifies deployment with its public cloud model and generally receives positive feedback for customer service due to Microsoft’s established support infrastructure.
Pricing and ROI: Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is costly, making it suitable for larger enterprises, with tricky ROI evaluation due to analytics complexities. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB has a pay-as-you-go model, though costs can quickly accumulate. However, users find its scalability and feature set worthwhile, requiring careful consideration of pricing structures for optimal ROI.
Getting an MVP of that project would have taken six to eight months, but because we had an active choice of using Azure Cosmos DB and other related cloud-native services of Azure, we were able to get to an MVP stage in a matter of weeks, which is six weeks.
You can react quickly and trim down the specs, memory, RAM, storage size, etc. It can save about 20% of the costs.
When I have done comparisons or cost calculations, I have sometimes personally seen as much as 25% to 30% savings.
The technical support is quite good and better than IBM.
Premier Support has deteriorated compared to what it used to be, especially for small to medium-sized customers like ours.
The response was quick.
I would rate customer service and support a nine out of ten.
The system scales up capacity when needed and scales down when not in use, preventing unnecessary expenses.
We like that it can auto-scale to demand, ensuring we only pay for what we use.
We have had no issues with its ability to search through large amounts of data.
We faced challenges but overcame those challenges successfully.
We have multiple availability zones, so nothing goes down.
Azure Cosmos DB would be a good choice if you have to deploy your application in a limited time frame and you want to auto-scale the database across different applications.
I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of availability and latency.
Integrating with Active Directory, managing security, and configuration are the main concerns.
We must ensure data security remains the top priority.
You have to monitor the Request Units.
The dashboard could include more detailed RU descriptions, IOPS, and compute metrics.
It can be deployed on-premises, unlike competitors' cloud-only solutions.
Initially, it seemed like an expensive way to manage a NoSQL data store, but so many improvements that have been made to the platform have made it cost-effective.
Cosmos DB is expensive, and the RU-based pricing model is confusing.
Cosmos DB is great compared to other databases because we can reduce the cost while doing the same things.
This is the only solution that is possible to install on-premise.
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is its real-time analytics capabilities, which allow for turnaround times in milliseconds.
Performance and security are valuable features, particularly when using Cosmos DB for MongoDB emulation and NoSQL.
The performance and scaling capabilities of Cosmos DB are excellent, allowing it to handle large workloads compared to other services such as Azure AI Search.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB | 6.7% |
| Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop | 3.3% |
| Other | 90.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 58 |
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers scalable, geo-replicated, multi-model support with high performance and low latency. It provides seamless Microsoft service integration, benefiting those needing flexible NoSQL, real-time analytics, and automatic scaling for diverse data types and quick global access.
Azure Cosmos DB is designed to store, manage, and query large volumes of both unstructured and structured data. Its NoSQL capabilities and global distribution are leveraged by organizations to support activities like IoT data management, business intelligence, and backend databases for web and mobile applications. While its robust security measures and availability are strengths, there are areas for improvement such as query complexity, integration with services like Databricks and MongoDB, documentation clarity, and performance issues. Enhancements in real-time analytics, API compatibility, cross-container joins, and indexing capabilities are sought after. Cost management, optimization tools, and better support for local development also require attention, as do improvements in user interface and advanced AI integration.
What are the key features of Azure Cosmos DB?Industries use Azure Cosmos DB to support business intelligence and IoT data management, using its capabilities for backend databases in web and mobile applications. The platform's scalability and real-time analytics benefit sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail, where managing diverse datasets efficiently is critical.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
