Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claude for Enterprise vs Google Gemini AI comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claude for Enterprise
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
7th
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
6th
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
5th
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (8th), AWS Marketplace (42nd)
Google Gemini AI
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
1st
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
3rd
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
1st
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Large Language Models (LLMs) category, the mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 9.1%. The mindshare of Google Gemini AI is 16.6%, down from 50.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Large Language Models (LLMs) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Google Gemini AI16.6%
Claude for Enterprise9.1%
Other74.3%
Large Language Models (LLMs)
 

Featured Reviews

Nishant Thakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Data visualization and workflow efficiency improve with automated features
I do not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer, and I was not offered a gift card or incentive for this review. We use other tech products such as Microsoft Excel and Slack. We can use my real name when publishing my review, along with my real company name. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Claude an 8.
Luís Silva - PeerSpot reviewer
Tool proves competitive with cost-effectiveness and speed while benefiting decision-making and integration capabilities, but shows room for enhancing creativity and handling large data contextually
There is another benefit in that Google Gemini is highly competitive from a cost perspective. The cost per token is very competitive. It's not the best - the Chinese models such as DeepSeek are better, but I can't use them. From a cost perspective, between European and United States options, Google Gemini is very competitive. It's not only its cost, it's also very performing. The time it takes to process the prompts and context information is very fast. It's one of the fastest models in the market. That's another advantage. There are other models which are also very good in quality but not as fast, such as Anthropic Claude. Google Gemini currently has a very good balance. The AI capabilities of Google Gemini are a multi-modal LLM which allows me to pass documents, images, and texts in the same prompt. Being multi-modal makes my life easier. I don't have to translate information before I can work with it. Google provides free tools to test scenarios, which speeds up development and reduces costs. It's a very fast and accurate model with quality responses.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."
"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
"I would rate my overall experience with Google Gemini as a nine out of ten."
"The most beneficial aspect of Google Gemini for me is that it's able to do searches much better."
"I'm impressed with its orchestration capabilities, which structure the workflow for research automatically and meaningfully, making it a helpful tool."
"I have seen many cases of reduced costs and working hours."
"Google Gemini uses all the data that Google has produced."
"Google Gemini has the best combination of scalability, costs, performance, and accuracy."
"The best features for my use cases with Google Gemini are its dynamic LLM model that can perform dynamic searches, which is wonderful for factual searches to understand numbers and to generate real-time answers."
"The most valuable feature of Google Gemini for us is its text writing capabilities, which we are using for writing texts and social media posts for our company's social media page."
 

Cons

"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
"There are scalability issues, and they are all related to what you can do within that context window of a million tokens."
"I do not have a special recommendation for improvement."
"Google Gemini could improve its functionalities compared to other tools like ChatGPT, especially in the customization options, Canvas mode, and web search tools, which aren't as advanced."
"When I have reached out to Google Support, it's been very limiting. I would rate Google at about a five."
"Google Gemini often gets factual answers wrong, which is problematic."
"Google Gemini's biggest strength is also its drawback; it's excellent for generating reports and working with data in real-time, but it isn't the most creative LLM for tasks such as creating a digital storytelling campaign or crafting marketing messages."
"Currently, it operates mostly autonomously, and while it provides structured activities, making the research configuration more accessible and flexible would be beneficial."
"Google Gemini needs more accurate answers and the ability to export data to Excel or Google Sheets."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Large Language Models (LLMs) solutions are best for your needs.
867,826 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
12%
University
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was straightforward without running into major challenges.
What needs improvement with Claude?
I face issues with Claude halting or hallucinating occasionally, as it happens with some projects but not all.
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I use Claude, particularly its artifact features, for data visualization. On a weekly basis, we create newsletters for our clients that require beautiful and good-looking presentations, particularl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Gemini?
If ten is expensive and one is free, I would rate it a three or four.
What needs improvement with Google Gemini?
Gemini can be improved in several ways. The ChatGPT platform is much more simple for getting started, whereas Gemini's initial setup is more difficult, particularly when using other services such a...
What is your primary use case for Google Gemini?
We have implemented real-time data streaming and analysis tools in Gemini. We have used them to develop complicated systems such as a tender valuation system and a vision tool to classify images on...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Google Bard
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Claude for Enterprise vs. Google Gemini AI and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.
867,826 professionals have used our research since 2012.