Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claude vs Gemini comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 26, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claude
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
10th
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
5th
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
5th
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
8th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (22nd)
Gemini
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
1st
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
2nd
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
1st
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Large Language Models (LLMs) category, the mindshare of Claude is 10.2%. The mindshare of Gemini is 14.3%, down from 50.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Large Language Models (LLMs)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2203806 - PeerSpot reviewer
AI generates human-like responses and automates tasks efficiently
The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way. Currently, additional solutions are needed to integrate these types of tools. If I want to read a spreadsheet from Google and pose a human-like question, I need to integrate two or three AI solutions. Security is also a concern. AI solutions currently lack security in their processing. If I need to access my confidential information and the AI solution accesses and displays it in responses for everyone, it is not the ideal scenario. Developing solutions to ensure security is crucial, although it is not their main objective at the moment.
Luís Silva - PeerSpot reviewer
Tool proves competitive with cost-effectiveness and speed while benefiting decision-making and integration capabilities, but shows room for enhancing creativity and handling large data contextually
There is another benefit in that Google Gemini is highly competitive from a cost perspective. The cost per token is very competitive. It's not the best - the Chinese models such as DeepSeek are better, but I can't use them. From a cost perspective, between European and United States options, Google Gemini is very competitive. It's not only its cost, it's also very performing. The time it takes to process the prompts and context information is very fast. It's one of the fastest models in the market. That's another advantage. There are other models which are also very good in quality but not as fast, such as Anthropic Claude. Google Gemini currently has a very good balance. The AI capabilities of Google Gemini are a multi-modal LLM which allows me to pass documents, images, and texts in the same prompt. Being multi-modal makes my life easier. I don't have to translate information before I can work with it. Google provides free tools to test scenarios, which speeds up development and reduces costs. It's a very fast and accurate model with quality responses.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."
"Recently, Google Gemini has been very stable, without performance issues, even handling network problems smoothly with a retry."
"The most valuable feature of Google Gemini is its ability to function as an intelligent assistant, providing accurate answers to natural language queries and performing translations."
"Google Gemini has the best combination of scalability, costs, performance, and accuracy."
"The most beneficial aspect of Google Gemini for me is that it's able to do searches much better."
"I'm impressed with its orchestration capabilities, which structure the workflow for research automatically and meaningfully, making it a helpful tool."
"It is like having an expert at my fingertips for those out-of-scope queries."
"The most valuable feature of Google Gemini for us is its text writing capabilities, which we are using for writing texts and social media posts for our company's social media page."
"Google Gemini uses all the data that Google has produced."
 

Cons

"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."
"I do not have a special recommendation for improvement."
"Google Gemini could improve its functionalities compared to other tools like ChatGPT, especially in the customization options, Canvas mode, and web search tools, which aren't as advanced."
"Google can improve in model justification and interpretability of answers."
"The binning process could be more intuitive, especially when grouping data into categories like age groups."
"Google Gemini's biggest strength is also its drawback; it's excellent for generating reports and working with data in real-time, but it isn't the most creative LLM for tasks such as creating a digital storytelling campaign or crafting marketing messages."
"There are scalability issues, and they are all related to what you can do within that context window of a million tokens."
"Google Gemini needs more accurate answers and the ability to export data to Excel or Google Sheets."
"Currently, it operates mostly autonomously, and while it provides structured activities, making the research configuration more accessible and flexible would be beneficial."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Large Language Models (LLMs) solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
University
7%
University
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?
The pricing is standard for the markets. It is not a monthly price, but a bucket with dollars for usage. If I make too many queries, I consume more of my budget on the platform.
What needs improvement with Claude?
The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way. Currently, additional solution...
What is your primary use case for Claude?
I primarily work on creating labs and testing cases. I generate agents for specific topics. If I want to develop an application, I use a specific prompt and utilize it as an agent to address a spec...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Gemini?
If ten is expensive and one is free, I would rate it a three or four.
What needs improvement with Google Gemini?
There's a new release every two months and it's very fast. I would say that they should keep increasing the context size of information that we can provide. Going from 1 million to 10 million would...
What is your primary use case for Google Gemini?
I am aware of Google Gemini translation tools, but I haven't used them. They don't impact my work as all my work is done in English, so I don't need any kind of translation. I've been using the API...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Google Bard, Google Gemini
 

Overview