Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) vs Cisco Network Analysis Module (NAM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Modeling Labs (CML)
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Network Modeling and Simulation (4th)
Cisco Network Analysis Modu...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (97th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) is designed for Network Modeling and Simulation and holds a mindshare of 11.9%, up 2.7% compared to last year.
Cisco Network Analysis Module (NAM), on the other hand, focuses on Network Monitoring Software, holds 0.3% mindshare.
Network Modeling and Simulation
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

OB
Limited support and costly setup detract from potential benefits
The stability of Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) is not very good. The iOSs consume so much memory that most typical machines do not have sufficient memory to utilize. For example, the Cisco 9200 iOSs require 24 gigabytes of memory to run in that tool, and that is only one image.
Use Cisco Network Analysis Module (NAM)?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Modeling and Simulation solutions are best for your needs.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
13%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Modeling Labs (CML)?
On a scale of 1 to 10, Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) is about eight or nine in terms of expense.
What needs improvement with Cisco Modeling Labs (CML)?
There are other areas where they could improve the product in my opinion.
What is your primary use case for Cisco Modeling Labs (CML)?
I have always used Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) in lieu of building practical labs and buying products for the labs so I can simulate configurations and test interoperability and things of that nature.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Raytheon, USG Corporation, Infinx, and University of California
Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation. Updated: July 2025.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.