Checkmarx One vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Checkmarx and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Spirent is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.0. Checkmarx holds a 10.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

21,297 Views
14,284 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

156 Views
93 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and Checkmarx One are prominent in the cybersecurity market, with Spirent focusing on network security testing and Checkmarx on application security. Checkmarx One seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, despite Spirent's competitive pricing.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers extensive network testing, detailed traffic generation, and threat simulation. Checkmarx One provides advanced application security with code analysis, vulnerability scanning, and enhanced application testing.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood can improve its reporting, analytics tools, and data presentation. Checkmarx One could enhance integration with third-party tools, streamline scanning processes, and improve system efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood is valued for simplified deployment and responsive customer service. Checkmarx One's setup can be complex, but user support is knowledgeable and helpful.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood is noted for affordability and good ROI, making it budget-friendly. Checkmarx One, although more expensive, offers a strong ROI due to its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

35th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable product."

"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."

"We were using HPE Security Fortify to scan code for security vulnerabilities, but it can scan only after a successful compile. If the code has dependencies or build errors, the scan fails. With Checkmarx, pre-compile scanning is seamless. This allows us to scan more code."

"What I like best about Checkmarx is that it has fewer false positives than other products, giving you better results."

"The features and technologies are very good. The flexibility and the roadmap have also been very good. They're at the forefront of delivering the additional capabilities that are required with cloud delivery, etc. Their ability to deliver what customers require and when they require is very important."

"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."

More Checkmarx One pros

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

Cons

"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."

"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it."

"There is nothing particular that I don't like in this solution. It can have more integrations, but the integrations that we would like are in the roadmap anyway, and they just need to deliver the roadmap. What I like about the roadmap is that it is going where it needs to go. If I were to look at the roadmap, there is nothing that is jumping out there that says to me, "Yeah. I'd like something else on the roadmap." What they're looking to deliver is what I would expect and forecast them to deliver."

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"It's relatively expensive."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?

CyberFlood is flexible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 40% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 78% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 22% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

April 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

April 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

No data available

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood

April 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.