Checkmarx One vs Ixia BreakingPoint comparison

Checkmarx and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Checkmarx holds a 9.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

20,789 Views
14,037 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Ixia BreakingPoint

Read 8 Ixia BreakingPoint reviews

788 Views
229 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Ixia BreakingPoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and Ixia BreakingPoint are two prominent tools in the security solutions category. Checkmarx One appears to have the edge in ease of use and pricing, while Ixia BreakingPoint stands out for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Checkmarx One features intuitive security scanning, detailed reporting, and competitive pricing, making it favorable for users seeking straightforward security solutions. Ixia BreakingPoint offers extensive testing capabilities, real-world threat simulation, and a comprehensive set of features, ideal for those who require in-depth analysis.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could enhance integration capabilities, performance speed, and provide more robust technical features. Ixia BreakingPoint could improve its documentation, expand customization, and focus on user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One is praised for quick deployment, along with responsive customer support, ensuring a smooth onboarding process. Ixia BreakingPoint may have a more complex deployment process, yet it provides strong technical support, attracting users who value comprehensive service.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is cost-effective, offering a faster return on investment, which appeals to budget-conscious buyers. Ixia BreakingPoint, despite higher initial setup costs, offers substantial long-term value through its extensive features, which many users find justify the price difference.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Ixia BreakingPoint Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

Ixia BreakingPoint

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

30th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 9.8%, down from 12.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia BreakingPoint is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Prakarn Wungpichayssuk

ManBusiness Directorager at CSG SOLUTION

Useful simulated attack database, high availability, but integration could improve

We are using Ixia BreakingPoint for security testing by generating traffic The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks. The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint. The vendor should provide a portal for webinars. I have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

"The most valuable feature is that it actually identifies the different criteria you can set to meet whatever standards you're trying to get your system accredited for."

"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."

"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."

"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."

"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."

"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."

More Checkmarx One pros

"We use Ixia BreakingPoint for Layer 7 traffic generation. That's what we like."

"I like that we can test cloud applications."

"The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The solution has many protocols and options, making it very flexible."

"The DDoS testing module is useful and quick to use."

"There is a virtual version of the product which is scaled to 100s of virtual testing blades."

Cons

"This product requires you to create your own rulesets. You have to do a lot of customization."

"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."

"Its user interface could be improved and made more friendly."

"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."

"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The solution originally was hard to configure; I'm not sure if they've updated this to make it simpler, but if not, it's something that could be streamlined."

"The price could be better."

"The production traffic simulations are not realistic enough for some types of DDoS attacks."

"I would appreciate some preconfigured network neighborhoods, which are predefined settings for testing networks."

"They should improve UI mode packages for the users."

"The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint."

"The quality of the traffic generation could be improved with Ixia BreakingPoint, i.e. to get closer to being accurate in what a real user will do."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"We have a one year subscription license for $25,000 US Dollars."

"The solution is expensive."

"or us, the pricing is somewhere around $12,000 a year. I'm unsure as to what new licenses now cost."

"There is no differentiation in licenses for Breaking Point. For one license, you will get all the features. There is no complexity in that."

"The price is high. We pay for the license monthly."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Ixia BreakingPoint?

The most valuable feature of Ixia BreakingPoint is the ransomware and malware database for simulated attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ixia BreakingPoint?

The price of the solution is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ixia BreakingPoint?

The integration could improve in Ixia BreakingPoint. The vendor should provide a portal for webinars.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 40% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Spirent CyberFlood vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 81% of the time

Synopsys Defensics vs Ixia BreakingPoint

Compared 19% of the time

More Ixia BreakingPoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

May 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

April 2025

Download Ixia BreakingPoint product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Corsa Technology

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

April 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Ixia BreakingPoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Ixia BreakingPoint and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Ixia BreakingPoint report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.