Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (9th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th)
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
29th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

NareshKumar10 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced Internal Security and Efficiency
Check Point Security Management can be improved by addressing a negative challenge I face: sometimes it does not show internet utilization in the GUI. When I ask support, they tell me to upgrade the firmware, which happens quite frequently. Since I deployed the device in my on-premises environment 1.5 years ago, I have experienced this issue three times. Check Point Security Management has not impacted my daily work or decision-making in any negative way. As an IT person, I occasionally need to check how much internet bandwidth has been used in the internal network over the past month, day, or week. During those times, when I open the data utilization column, it shows nothing available. Each time this happens, I need to upgrade to the latest version of the firmware, and this frequent updating affects my productivity negatively. If Check Point addresses this issue in the future, it will be beneficial for all customers using Check Point SMBs.
RichPhillips - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies
The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.  The solution has provided us with a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies.  I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.  I…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It provides for capabilities and has allowed us to be more scalable."
"The centralized logs and management are helpful."
"Check Point Security Management has impacted our organization positively; it has brought about efficiency, improved our network security, and helped our networking team be more reliable and efficient."
"The fact that everything starts from the same unified management console makes it very easy to integrate new equipment or functionalities once the operator has become familiar with it, as everything will follow similar management or operation mechanisms."
"The log dashboard in the SmartConsole is very useful and convenient for monitoring and tracking."
"It's very easy for management to understand workflow and everything."
"The cluster solution made our job easier any fault to the device will not halt entire internet connectivity."
"The solution is ideal for use and deployment in a large infrastructure environment."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."
"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."
 

Cons

"In my experience, the place they can improve the most is in the technical support where I have had some serious problems that could not be solved in time due to a lack of knowledge of the assigned engineer."
"Check Point could improve by enhancing the networking in their solution in order to align it with the existing network architecture."
"As per personal experience and based on many organizations, Check Point needs to improve PS services."
"In order to work management console, you need some good appliance or you need to provide more CPU and Memory to the appliance."
"In future releases I'd like to see better integration with other applications and solutions. Also, the cost of the license is too high, it's too expensive."
"It also offers compatibility with third-party security solutions, however, it is not a lot. This needs to be improved."
"License update and upgrade processes can be made a little easier."
"If the SmartView monitor can be integrated in the R80.40 and R81 versions, that would be ideal in understanding the trends and graphs of how traffic is observed hitting the different Check Point Firewall Gateways that the Security Management controls."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."
"If one will be very expensive, and ten means low price, I rate the tool's price as a three out of ten."
"This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."
"Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."
"Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."
"Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."
"The solution is expensive."
"The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."
"It is expensive."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Performing Arts
12%
Insurance Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
I see areas of improvement for Check Point Security Management such as GUI stability and performance, and simplified firmware upgrades. I and my colleagues occasionally report glitches or missing d...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
My main use case for Check Point Security Management is to unify firewall and threat prevention policies across multiple international sites, so I use SmartConsole to streamline rule updates and mo...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
While Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is effective, I always prefer to have a second source of threat intelligence feed to ensure coverage for zero-day vulnerabilities that might be missed. This is mo...
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus ( /products/palo-alto-networks-autofocus-reviews ) for threat intelligence. Palo Alto Networks has its own threat intelligence team, Unit 42, which analyzes submi...
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten. I always activate it when purchasing Palo Alto Networks products because it's simple to deploy and beneficial. However, for non-Palo Alto...
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.