Check Point Security Management vs Microsoft Purview Audit comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Microsoft are both solutions in the Log Management category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.3. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.7% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Microsoft’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Check Point Security Manage...

Read 86 Check Point Security Management reviews

3,497 Views
2,133 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Audit

Read 4 Microsoft Purview Audit reviews

1,855 Views
1,373 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point Security Manage...

Microsoft Purview Audit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Check Point Security Management and Microsoft Purview Audit both operate in the cybersecurity field, offering unique features to meet various security needs. Microsoft Purview Audit often gains preference due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Check Point Security Management is noted for policy management, integration capabilities, and effective reporting. Microsoft Purview Audit stands out with detailed monitoring, comprehensive audit logs, and extensive change tracking capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Check Point Security Management could benefit from enhancements in interface intuitiveness, advanced feature integration, and streamlining complex functionalities. Microsoft Purview Audit may need improvements in ease of setup, resource allocation, and simplifying its deployment process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Security Management is recognized for straightforward deployment and strong customer service. Microsoft Purview Audit, although powerful, may require a comprehensive setup process and has been noted for having less responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Security Management is viewed as delivering better immediate ROI due to efficient solutions and reasonable setup costs. Despite initial cost concerns, Microsoft Purview Audit provides long-term value with an expansive feature set, which users find justifies its pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Security Management vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Security Management vs. Microsoft Purview Audit

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...

Ranking in Log Management

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (10th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (3rd)

Microsoft Purview Audit

Ranking in Log Management

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Audit is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point Security Management	0.7%
Microsoft Purview Audit	1.1%
Other	98.2%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Roy Lopez

TI at a security firm with 51-200 employees

Simplified threat detection and reduced policy deployment time

The standout features of Check Point Security Management are unified policy management, real-time visibility, and automation capabilities, making it a powerful tool for security management. Consistency across environments with Check Point Security Management helps me ensure that instead of maintaining separate rules for firewalls, cloud workloads, and data centers, we apply one unified policy that covers them all. This reduces misconfigurations and ensures compliance, proving to be a time-saver because rolling out a new rule or updating an existing one takes minutes, not hours, because it is propagated everywhere automatically. Automation is one of the most valuable aspects of Check Point Security Management, and it often does not get enough attention compared to headline features like unified policies or visibility. With policy automation, routine tasks such as rule creation, compliance checks, or policy updates can be automated, reducing human error and saving hours of manual work. Check Point Security Management has simplified administration in my organization because instead of juggling multiple consoles, everything is managed from a single pane of glass. This has reduced complexity and saved significant time for our IT team, improving our operational efficiency. For a policy update, I used to spend two or three hours across multiple consoles. Now, with unified management in Check Point Security Management, it takes thirty to forty minutes, resulting in about a seventy percent reduction in effort, greatly boosting productivity.

Read full review

Oksana Kosukhina.

Cloud Solution Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Integrated auditing has strengthened data retention and improved incident investigations

I have seen areas for improvement, specifically in Microsoft Purview Audit or in general about Microsoft. I have had a situation with documentation. I had a customer who wanted to create alerts and they had Microsoft 365 Business Premium. In the documentation, it was noted that this license is enough for creating alerts. When we tried to make them, we noticed they cannot do it with Microsoft 365 E3 because the customer had limited features to manage alerts. The customer had to buy E3. We created Microsoft support requests, and they confirmed that the documentation displayed not the real situation and they have been going to update documentation. The same situation occurred now with implementing Microsoft Purview Audit in the last autumn. eDiscovery was combined with search and content search, and the documentation was not clear at the beginning. It was a little difficult to describe to customers that now it is a part of eDiscovery. Content search is a very simple functionality, while eDiscovery is a little difficult. I am not entirely sure why Microsoft is going in the way of combining these services because they are the same. However, for a customer who has never seen these services, it is difficult to understand quickly. The same situation occurs with litigation holds and some other holds. For any mail, I am trying to keep data. For example, emails are held for a year or two years, ten years, it does not matter. It is difficult to understand where to find this data and where these emails are being held. I need to use eDiscovery to find out all deleted data that was kept somewhere in some hidden folders of the mailbox. Regular customers and regular administrators know that on-premises Exchange, for example, allows them to find the data in some repository and review the list of kept data. However, with this hold, we do not have any functionality to review the list of kept data. It is difficult to understand for customers how to work with this. I had a case where I spent three or four hours working deeply with a customer to explain how to work with eDiscovery, why Content Search is not there when it was before, what is an eDiscovery case, and why we are talking about all of this just to review a list of kept emails. This is difficult.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Check Point Security Management has positively impacted our organization by providing better administration control and a unified central pane of glass for daily configuration."

"The product's installation phase was easy."

"The solution is easy to use and comes with few vulnerabilities. You don't have to worry about release upgrades. Life cycle management is very easy."

"The intuitive interface also allows new team members to adapt to the technology if they are not familiar with it initially. It doesn't take much for one to familiarize themselves with the product."

"The tool is cost-effective."

"The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as TLS violations or content violations."

"Centralized policy management has drastically reduced the time we spend configuring and deploying rules across multiple gateways from hours to minutes, thanks to SmartConsole and automated policy deployment."

"After deploying Check Point Security Management, we improved our productivity by integrating all devices into a single console instead of managing separate log-ins for each branch's gateways, making our admin team's tasks easier."

More Check Point Security Management pros

"The overall user experience with Microsoft Purview Audit is of higher quality than when it was branded as Compliance Center, and Microsoft consistently updates and evolves functionalities and the overall experience."

"The main Microsoft feature is that it offers common integration of services, of data, of identity, meaning user accounts, user access, and privileged access."

"The platform has significantly enhanced our operational insight into the overall Microsoft 365 environment."

"We're easily saving at least one hour per day using this solution."

Cons

"The graphical interface is nice but it is a bit heavy."

"The documentation of Check Point Security Management is not intuitive because it is for advanced technical support, and when I need to deploy different features, it is complicated for junior support or technical personnel."

"In the future, I would like to see more frequent updates because of the changing security landscape."

"We would like to improve the upgrade process in order to do mass upgrades to firewalls and to be able to upgrade target firewalls at the same time."

"Check Point EDR has room for improvement, especially in the area of Data Loss Prevention where it currently lacks functionality."

"This solution is stable, although there is some room for improvement."

"For those not familiar with the Command Line interface, there should be an option in the GUI for operating backups."

"I would like the ability to have an overview, cross-site: One portal that does all firewalls. Also, the user interface is overly complicated."

More Check Point Security Management cons

"Areas for product improvement include enhancing customization options and integrating more comprehensive compliance features."

"I had a case where I spent three or four hours working deeply with a customer to explain how to work with eDiscovery, why Content Search is not there when it was before, what is an eDiscovery case, and why we are talking about all of this just to review a list of kept emails."

"We do have a Denial of Access happening."

"We are still in the early stages of leveraging Microsoft Purview Audit. Currently, it's primarily used for the audit function."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one will be very expensive, and ten means low price, I rate the tool's price as a three out of ten."

"The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."

"The solution is expensive."

"Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."

"This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."

"Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."

"Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Security Firm

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	55
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	43

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?

Based on my experience with Check Point Security Management, I do not see anything lacking. It is currently managing all the gateways, and we are able to achieve what we want from our perspective. ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?

I am using Check Point Security Management in our day-to-day operations to centrally manage all Check Point Security Gateways within my organization. All of these Check Point Security Gateways are ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Check Point Security Management?

I advise anyone having multiple security gateways that are managed stand-alone to deploy Check Point Security Management and manage all security gateways from a central console and central team. Th...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Audit?

It is not so expensive in comparison with other products, but I can tell you about an example.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Audit?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Audit?

I work with Defender for IoT by chance because I see that we have enough reviews for Defender for Office 365 today, and we need reviews for some Azure products. I work with Azure products such as L...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Check Point Security Management

Compared 10% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Check Point Security Management

Compared 9% of the time

Wazuh vs Check Point Security Management

Compared 6% of the time

Anomali vs Check Point Security Management

Compared 6% of the time

Recorded Future vs Check Point Security Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point Security Management Competitors

eSentire MDR for Log vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Data Lake vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 6% of the time

Sumo Logic Security vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Audit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Security Management

April 2026

Download Check Point Security Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Audit

March 2026

Download Microsoft Purview Audit product report

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management

No data available

Overview

Check Point Security Management is an advanced security management platform for enterprises. The platform integrates all aspects of security. A single platform manages the entire infrastructure, from data centers to private/public cloud deployments.

Check Point Security Management is a reliable and easy-to-use security platform. It integrates all aspects of your security environment to strengthen the security posture without impairing productivity. The system has a layered policy model. This means the security policy can be separated into layers for network segmentation. Different administrators can manage different policies. The policy layer automates the tasks.

The platform is extensible, scalable, and integrates easily with orchestration systems and change management.

Basic Components of the Infrastructure

Smart Console: The Check Point Graphical User Interface for connecting and managing Security Management Servers. The smart console provides an integrated solution via the following features:

Security policy management
System health monitoring
Multi-domain management

The smart console offers several advantages. Changes in security policies and logs can be done with a click. You can navigate from an item within a log to the policy. There are also built-in multi-language support and accessibility features.

1. Security Management Server: The server manages security gateways with set security policies and monitors security events on the network.

The automation server is an integrated part of the management server. The API server is active by default on servers with 4 GB of RAM or more and on standalone servers with 8 or more GB of RAM.

The automation server communicates with the management server the same way as the Smart Console. This architecture allows the same validation errors and warnings to be presented when using an automation session.

The same audit logs generated using the Smart Console are also generated using an automation session. If you have a multi-domain environment, there is only one automation server that monitors all the IP addresses of the multi-domain management server.

2. Security Gateway is placed at the edge of the network. It monitors and filters traffic and enforces security policies.

Logging, Event management, and Monitoring

With Check Point Security Management, logging, reporting, event management, and monitoring are integrated. The platform features widgets and chart templates that optimize visibility. One of the best features is the one-click exploration. This simplifies going from a general overview to specific event details.

Benefits of Check Point Security Management

The platform keeps pace with dynamic network changes
Helps align security with business goals
Helps with threat prevention.
Reduces operational costs

The unified console also means a single policy for users, data, applications, and networks. The granularity control helps accelerate administration processes. This feature, together with automation, is key to achieving reduced operational overhead. Security teams can automate tasks and even create self-service security web portals with the Check Point Security Management platform.

Threat management is fully integrated, with reporting, logging, and monitoring all in one dashboard. This provides full visibility into the security of the network.

Security Management Suite

The Security Management Suite consists of the following modules:

Policy Management: Includes central management of different security policies across multiple domains and browser-based security management.
Operations Management: Includes compliance, provisioning, workflow automation, and user directory centralization.
Threat Management: Includes centralizing security event correlation for enforcement points. Centrally monitors Check Point devices.

Reviews from Real Users

A Network Security Engineer/Architect at a tech services company says, "The features we like and find the most valuable are the ways we can manage the policy, create objects, and drag and drop objects in our daily operation. It makes our daily operation on the firewall management much easier than going, for example, to one firewall, then going to the other."

"The management API is the best new feature for me. It allows us to further automate our customers' automated server ordering," says a System Engineer Network & Security at OTTO GmbH & Co KG.

A Senior Infrastructure Services Specialist at St.George Bank Limited adds that "The solution is ideal for use and deployment in a large infrastructure environment."

Check Point Software Technologies

The unified auditing functionality in Microsoft 365 provides organizations with visibility into many types of audited activities across many different services in Microsoft 365. Advanced Audit helps organizations to conduct forensic and compliance investigations by increasing audit log retention required to conduct an investigation, providing access to crucial events that help determine scope of compromise, and faster access to Office 365 Management Activity API.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Security Management vs. Microsoft Purview Audit

April 2026

Free Report: Check Point Security Management vs. Microsoft Purview Audit

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Microsoft Purview Audit and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Security Management vs. Microsoft Purview Audit report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.