Check Point Security Management vs Microsoft Purview Audit comparison

Check Point Security Management vs. Microsoft Purview Audit

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...

Ranking in Log Management

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (4th)

Microsoft Purview Audit

Ranking in Log Management

35th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Audit is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point Security Management	1.0%
Microsoft Purview Audit	1.1%
Other	97.9%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Roy Lopez

TI at a security firm with 51-200 employees

Simplified threat detection and reduced policy deployment time

The standout features of Check Point Security Management are unified policy management, real-time visibility, and automation capabilities, making it a powerful tool for security management. Consistency across environments with Check Point Security Management helps me ensure that instead of maintaining separate rules for firewalls, cloud workloads, and data centers, we apply one unified policy that covers them all. This reduces misconfigurations and ensures compliance, proving to be a time-saver because rolling out a new rule or updating an existing one takes minutes, not hours, because it is propagated everywhere automatically. Automation is one of the most valuable aspects of Check Point Security Management, and it often does not get enough attention compared to headline features like unified policies or visibility. With policy automation, routine tasks such as rule creation, compliance checks, or policy updates can be automated, reducing human error and saving hours of manual work. Check Point Security Management has simplified administration in my organization because instead of juggling multiple consoles, everything is managed from a single pane of glass. This has reduced complexity and saved significant time for our IT team, improving our operational efficiency. For a policy update, I used to spend two or three hours across multiple consoles. Now, with unified management in Check Point Security Management, it takes thirty to forty minutes, resulting in about a seventy percent reduction in effort, greatly boosting productivity.

Read full review

Oksana Kosukhina.

Cloud Solution Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Integrated auditing has strengthened data retention and improved incident investigations

I have seen areas for improvement, specifically in Microsoft Purview Audit or in general about Microsoft. I have had a situation with documentation. I had a customer who wanted to create alerts and they had Microsoft 365 Business Premium. In the documentation, it was noted that this license is enough for creating alerts. When we tried to make them, we noticed they cannot do it with Microsoft 365 E3 because the customer had limited features to manage alerts. The customer had to buy E3. We created Microsoft support requests, and they confirmed that the documentation displayed not the real situation and they have been going to update documentation. The same situation occurred now with implementing Microsoft Purview Audit in the last autumn. eDiscovery was combined with search and content search, and the documentation was not clear at the beginning. It was a little difficult to describe to customers that now it is a part of eDiscovery. Content search is a very simple functionality, while eDiscovery is a little difficult. I am not entirely sure why Microsoft is going in the way of combining these services because they are the same. However, for a customer who has never seen these services, it is difficult to understand quickly. The same situation occurs with litigation holds and some other holds. For any mail, I am trying to keep data. For example, emails are held for a year or two years, ten years, it does not matter. It is difficult to understand where to find this data and where these emails are being held. I need to use eDiscovery to find out all deleted data that was kept somewhere in some hidden folders of the mailbox. Regular customers and regular administrators know that on-premises Exchange, for example, allows them to find the data in some repository and review the list of kept data. However, with this hold, we do not have any functionality to review the list of kept data. It is difficult to understand for customers how to work with this. I had a case where I spent three or four hours working deeply with a customer to explain how to work with eDiscovery, why Content Search is not there when it was before, what is an eDiscovery case, and why we are talking about all of this just to review a list of kept emails. This is difficult.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using a single GUI with a single management IP makes things easier if you have to administrate several customers."

"The product has done a great job in protecting our business network and SCADA systems."

"We love the ability to monitor performance in real-time, and gather critical information about network flows and traffic."

"Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization because the department can publish different policies or search different events or try to know different threats in one security management center for different gateways."

"The cluster solution made our job easier any fault to the device will not halt entire internet connectivity."

"However, after deploying Check Point firewalls in our organization we found drastic changes in the performance of our network."

"Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization by defining how we oversee and enforce security policies across the entire infrastructure, and instead of juggling multiple consoles, we now have a single, unified view that makes monitoring and response much faster."

"The unique management using Smart Console for all firewalls is very useful."

More Check Point Security Management pros

"The main Microsoft feature is that it offers common integration of services, of data, of identity, meaning user accounts, user access, and privileged access."

"The overall user experience with Microsoft Purview Audit is of higher quality than when it was branded as Compliance Center, and Microsoft consistently updates and evolves functionalities and the overall experience."

"We're easily saving at least one hour per day using this solution."

"The platform has significantly enhanced our operational insight into the overall Microsoft 365 environment."

Cons

"Troubleshooting is quite complicated within multi-domain management."

"My experience with Check Point Security Management's customer support in the past was not the best."

"In order to work management console, you need some good appliance or you need to provide more CPU and Memory to the appliance."

"I would like it to be the administrator of equipment or Next Generation firewalls (which have to be managed on this platform) and to be able to manage other services (like Harmony) that also belong to Check Point."

"If the SmartView monitor can be integrated in the R80.40 and R81 versions, that would be ideal in understanding the trends and graphs of how traffic is observed hitting the different Check Point Firewall Gateways that the Security Management controls."

"We'd like to see more and more integration possibilities between Checkpoint and other vendor security solutions such as Malwarebytes, SIEM solution providers, and standalone vulnerability scanners."

"In the last version from 80.20, there are some issues around SSNA Diction. I would like this to be improved."

"SD-WAN functionality could be added."

More Check Point Security Management cons

"We do have a Denial of Access happening."

"We are still in the early stages of leveraging Microsoft Purview Audit. Currently, it's primarily used for the audit function."

"I had a case where I spent three or four hours working deeply with a customer to explain how to work with eDiscovery, why Content Search is not there when it was before, what is an eDiscovery case, and why we are talking about all of this just to review a list of kept emails."

"Areas for product improvement include enhancing customization options and integrating more comprehensive compliance features."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."

"If one will be very expensive, and ten means low price, I rate the tool's price as a three out of ten."

"The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."

"Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."

"This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."

"Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."

"The solution is expensive."

"Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

Security Firm

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	43

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?

Based on my experience with Check Point Security Management, I do not see anything lacking. It is currently managing all the gateways, and we are able to achieve what we want from our perspective. ...

What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?

I am using Check Point Security Management in our day-to-day operations to centrally manage all Check Point Security Gateways within my organization. All of these Check Point Security Gateways are ...

What advice do you have for others considering Check Point Security Management?

I advise anyone having multiple security gateways that are managed stand-alone to deploy Check Point Security Management and manage all security gateways from a central console and central team. Th...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Audit?

It is not so expensive in comparison with other products, but I can tell you about an example.

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Audit?

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Audit?

I work with Defender for IoT by chance because I see that we have enough reviews for Defender for Office 365 today, and we need reviews for some Azure products. I work with Azure products such as L...

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Check Point Security Management

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Check Point Security Management

Compared 7% of the time

Anomali vs Check Point Security Management

Compared 6% of the time

Wazuh vs Check Point Security Management

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Check Point Security Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point Security Management Competitors

eSentire MDR for Log vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Data Lake vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs Microsoft Purview Audit

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Audit Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point Security Management

Download Check Point Security Management product report

Microsoft Purview Audit

Download Microsoft Purview Audit product report

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management

No data available

Overview

Check Point Security Management offers centralized policy control, a unified console, and role-based access. It simplifies security operations through automation, real-time monitoring, and integration capabilities, ensuring efficient management across multiple environments.

Users leverage Check Point Security Management for streamlined configuration and consistent security enforcement. The platform's scalability and flexibility suit diverse environments, including cloud and on-premise settings, enabling efficient firewall and security gateway management. Real-time monitoring and logging capabilities facilitate swift incident response and comprehensive oversight.

What are the key features of Check Point Security Management?

Centralized Policy Control: Streamlines rule updates and management.
Unified Console: Provides a single interface for easy navigation.
Role-Based Access: Ensures secure and customized user experiences.
Policy Automation: Enhances operational efficiency through automation.
Real-Time Monitoring: Accelerates incident response times.
Logging and Audit Trails: Improves visibility and accountability.
Integration Capabilities: Supports diverse technological environments.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Streamlined Operations: Reduces management complexity and time.
Scalable Architecture: Adapts to changing management requirements.
Improved Security: Ensures consistent security enforcement.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides comprehensive oversight of network activities.

Check Point Security Management is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications. These sectors require stringent security protocols and benefit from real-time monitoring and comprehensive threat prevention capabilities it provides. Organizations use it to manage and enforce security measures, ensuring secure data transmission and infrastructure protection.

Check Point Software Technologies

Microsoft Purview Audit offers streamlined, user-friendly solutions for managing Microsoft 365 environments. It excels in security incident log management, privileged access control, and simplifying data access adjustments with integration between AD and Azure AD.

Key functionalities of Microsoft Purview Audit include capabilities tailored to monitor environment health, compliance, and security management within Active Directory and Microsoft ecosystems. Users can efficiently manage roles, access controls, and data retention protocols, making it a valuable resource for strategically-driven organizations with legal requirements. While the integration with Dataverse enhances its utility, user challenges arise due to complexity in certain aspects such as litigation holds and accessing hidden folder data. Additionally, users have reported issues with the precision of customization and compliance documentation, particularly when handling alerts and eDiscovery functions. Despite these challenges, Purview Audit remains a leading tool within the Microsoft suite for managing log retrieval and security oversight.

What are the key features of Microsoft Purview Audit?

User-friendly Dashboards: Easily track the health of Microsoft 365 environments.
Privileged Access Management: Efficiently manage and secure access to critical resources.
Log Management: Gain insights into security incidents through comprehensive log management.
Rules-based Access Control: Implement strict access protocols tailored to organizational frameworks.
Role-based Delegation: Streamline role delegation while adhering to security policies.
Zero Trust Security: Enhance security with a zero trust model for data protection.

What benefits should users look for?

Data Retention: Meet legal and compliance needs efficiently.
Easy Configuration: Simplify setup processes for quick implementation.
Seamless AD to Azure AD Migration: Transition effortlessly between directory services.
Detailed Audit Capabilities: Understand, monitor, and review security actions easily.

In industries with stringent data governance and compliance mandates, Microsoft Purview Audit is utilized to ensure a robust security posture. Users engage it for monitoring compliance within financial services, healthcare, and other sectors where data privacy is paramount. With its SaaS-based integration in Microsoft environments, organizations access refined log data leveraging platforms like Power Platform Admin Center, ensuring comprehensive oversight and operational efficiency.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger

Information Not Available

Check Point Security Management vs. Microsoft Purview Audit