We performed a comparison between Check Point Security Management and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The intuitive interface also allows new team members to adapt to the technology if they are not familiar with it initially. It doesn't take much for one to familiarize themselves with the product."
"The cluster solution made our job easier any fault to the device will not halt entire internet connectivity."
"Regarding the tool's valuable features, I would say that Check Point is a very accessible and fast tool, especially when dealing with logs for the first time."
"Key features include the ability to include logs for everything that you do for admin. Also, it has web filtering built in and VPN."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Security Management is the high level of visibility"
"The compliance is great."
"Check Point Security Management has improved our organization because all corporate firewalls can be managed with a single interface."
"The log dashboard in the SmartConsole is very useful and convenient for monitoring and tracking."
"The maintenance is easy."
"The solution's features and pricing are pretty good."
"It can block certain web pages that may contain viruses or pose a threat to the computer."
"The product is quite affordable."
"ESET Endpoint Security is stable, I did not have any issues with it."
"ESET is the fastest solution on the market. It's also highly reliable. On top of the base configuration, you can set it to respond to events such as ransomware detection with network isolation and other automatic tasks. Our customers prefer ESET because it's reliable, fast, and light on system resources."
"The solution is stable."
"ESET Endpoint Security is stable. When comparing the solution to competitors it is more stable."
"In the future, I would like the platform to be able to integrate or manage appliances or third-party equipment."
"It also offers compatibility with third-party security solutions, however, it is not a lot. This needs to be improved."
"It would be helpful if the documentation and good practice guides are updated. Many are still from R77."
"If the SmartView monitor can be integrated in the R80.40 and R81 versions, that would be ideal in understanding the trends and graphs of how traffic is observed hitting the different Check Point Firewall Gateways that the Security Management controls."
"Policy installation time can be reduced."
"Troubleshooting is quite complicated within multi-domain management. If an issue arises, the local administrator has to keep in mind that there are other domains that could be also affected."
"There is room for improvement in reliability."
"Even though the platform is simple, and creating security policies is a fairly quick task, creating a bulk of policies at once (ie. for a migration) could be a useful tool. This is probably possible through scripting, however, having an easy-to-use "import CSV" button would be beneficial."
"A few times, we have had problems with downloading an agent. We had to try multiple times and multiple uploads."
"They could be more aggressive with malware."
"The solution can improve the modules, and it is lacking centralized management and visibility of the endpoints."
"The solution lacks the automation I need."
"There are other features you can add on to help make the security stronger, however, they should offer better security even on a basic level."
"I think that ESET is a little too heavy on the CPU."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"I would like for ESET to create a central management solution. This would make it practical to use the internet for medium-sized networks."
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Security Management is ranked 13th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 55 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 96 reviews. Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our Check Point Security Management vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
