Snyk and Check Point CloudGuard WAF operate in the application and API security sector. Snyk appears to have an edge in integration and developer-friendly features, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers superior threat detection and high-grade security features.
Features: Snyk is valued for its easy integration into existing systems, a comprehensive vulnerability database ensuring up-to-date security intelligence, and seamless Slack notification integration. These features allow developers to quickly identify and act on vulnerabilities. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is recognized for its powerful Intrusion Prevention System, machine learning capabilities for effective threat detection, and AI-driven behavior analysis to secure applications without reliance on signature-based protection.
Room for Improvement: Snyk could enhance its offerings by including SAST or DAST tools, improving scan times in CI integrations, and offering more granular notification controls. Additionally, better integration with various IDEs is desired. Check Point CloudGuard WAF should focus on reducing system latency, clarifying pricing models, and enhancing documentation support while providing greater customization options for managing mobile devices.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snyk's adaptability to various cloud environments and strong customer support, characterized by direct communication and responsiveness, are key strengths. Check Point CloudGuard WAF also offers flexible deployment options but experiences occasional delays in support and technical service. Technical assistance for both platforms is generally favorable, though Snyk stakes a stronger claim in proactive support engagement.
Pricing and ROI: While Snyk's pricing is on the higher end, it is considered justifiable due to its extensive feature set and positive impact on developer productivity and vulnerability management. Some users note the additional costs for features like SSO. Check Point CloudGuard WAF's pricing feedback is mixed; it is viewed as cost-effective by some, thanks to its feature set, although others suggest it is pricier compared to alternatives. However, the improved security and overall return on investment it provides are well-regarded.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
Their response time aligns with their SLA commitments.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
It handles increasing traffic easily because we can extend our demands based on our needs.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
It's not something you manipulate, it's not an antivirus where you deal with signatures, updates, and upgrades every day.
I would say that the more automation this product has, the easier it will be to work with it.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.
As we are moving toward GenAI, we expect Snyk to leverage AI features to improve code scanning findings.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
After negotiations, we received a special package with a good price point.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.
The best feature of Snyk is the integration with our ticketing system, which is Jira.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.
What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.
Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.
Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.
What are the key features of Snyk?Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.