We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I find the configuration and real-time monitoring features valuable."
"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."
"It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running."
"The app control is very sensitive, and the threat detection and prevention is better than other Check Point solutions. There is a centralized management console for threat protection and self-inspection."
"The solution offers continuous security monitoring and alerting, which can help organizations detect and respond to security incidents in real time."
"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."
"It provides advanced analytics that gives each team time to prepare for any threat that might occur in the future."
"We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results."
"It's good testing software."
"The extension that it provides with the community version for the skills mapping is excellent."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is one of the best user-friendly solutions for getting the proxy set up."
"For pentesting scenarios, this is the number one tool. It can capture the request, and there are so many functions that are very good for that. For example, a black box satellite host."
"The tool provides complimentary services. It allows you to add a lot of extensions, and you can get extensions quite often. It is quite a flexible application."
"You can download different plugins if you don't have them in the standard edition."
"I personally love its capability to automatically and accurately detect vulnerabilities. So, I would say it is the Burp scanner that is THE most powerful, valuable, and an awesome feature."
"The solution scans web applications and supports APIs, which are the main features I really like."
"In terms of features, I do not have any negatives. Their integration is extremely quick. It is better than others I have been involved with in the past. Their pricing model, however, can be better."
"We would like to have a solution of this type for the administration of applications from mobile devices."
"The documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly."
"A feature we'd like to see in the future is something that could protect against other attack vectors, with a focus on application protection."
"It was costlier than other solutions."
"I would like to be able to integrate the theme of Artificial Intelligence to help review issues and to monitor and view the security issue while also suggesting and interpreting and additionally configuring solutions - basically, acting as an interpreter."
"Cost reduction and trial period extension should be considered with some lucrative discount offerings in buying standard versions."
"CloudGuard for Application Security, like the other Check Point applications, has been presenting major latency problems when entering their administrative portal."
"We'd like to have more integration potential across all versions of the product."
"The tool is very expensive."
"The number of false positives need to be reduced on the solution."
"The Initial setup is a bit complex."
"Currently, the scanning is only available in the full version of Burp, and not in the Community version."
"You can have many false positives in Burp Suite. It depends on the scale of the penetration testing."
"If we're running a huge number of scans regularly, it slows down the tool."
"The technical support team's response time is mostly delayed and should be improved."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 57 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "The solution is versatile and easy to deploy, but it needs to give more detailed security reports". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube and Checkmarx One, whereas PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix, HCL AppScan and Qualys Web Application Scanning. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
