Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Drata comparison

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Read 9 Drata reviews

1,760 Views
1,760 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Drata are cloud security and compliance management solutions. Data indicates Drata excels in comprehensive security features, while Check Point integrates security in existing cloud setups effectively.

Features: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP provides advanced threat prevention, cloud network security, and automated compliance checks. Drata features continuous compliance monitoring and customizable security frameworks, emphasizing automated compliance over Check Point’s threat prevention focus.

Room for Improvement: Check Point can improve user interface intuitiveness, streamline policy customization, and enhance real-time threat alerts. Drata could benefit from expanding integration capabilities, offering more detailed compliance reports, and reducing the complexity for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP integrates seamlessly with leading cloud platforms and has responsive support. Drata provides an efficient deployment process with a user-friendly dashboard and commendable support, ensuring smooth onboarding and quick feature use.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP may have higher initial costs but offers significant ROI with its security infrastructure. Drata’s competitive pricing and compliance management features offer compelling ROI by reducing audit preparation time, ensuring cost-effectiveness through automated compliance focus.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Drata Report (Updated: September 2025).

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Drata

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Ranking in Compliance Management

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (9th), Cloud and Data Center Security (8th), Container Security (10th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (6th)

Drata

Ranking in Compliance Management

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Compliance Management category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is 5.6%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Drata is 7.0%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compliance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Drata	7.0%
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP	5.6%
Other	87.4%

Compliance Management

Featured Reviews

Bart Coddens

Cloud Engineer at Cloudar

Evolved cloud security with active monitoring but needs interface consistency

The user interface needs work. Sometimes, it is a transition from the old tool to the new CNAPP Two that I currently have, and remnants of the old environment can still be detected. I require consistency in the user interface to ensure everything is streamlined into the same look and feel. More work is needed in fine-tuning the threat data towards your CSPM and activity logs, aligning them with business intelligence, which requires a cohesive console interface. My assessment of CloudGuard CDRs in intrusion detection and threat hunting capabilities is that it still needs some work. All the threat data that comes in, you need to fine tune it a bit.

Read full review

Johnny Chen

SecOps Engineer III at FINIX PAYMENTS, INC

Collects and stores compliance evidence and documentation for you using native integrations with your tech stack.

There is room for improvement in Drata. The core features are solid, but some new features are in a very MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. They work, but the user experience isn't always smooth. While the core features are well-developed compared to the market, the new features need more polish. They could benefit from more user feedback and iterations to make them more useful. Some of these new features look promising buthave flaws, so we can’t fully adopt them or justify paying extra for them now. The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set updifferent integrations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I value the comfort and the ability to receive proper insights almost hands-off."

"The most valuable feature is the single dashboard that enables us to manage the entire cloud environment from one place."

"It has an analytics service that does research for us."

"The CDR helps detect anomalous behavior and respond to threats before they become an issue."

"Assets Management as it provide complete visibility of our workload inkling EC2 instance or Serverless"

"The most valuable feature is the separate environment."

"The visibility in our cloud environment is the most valuable feature."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP pros

"Drata helps eliminate evidence gathering and makes assigning different activities to different team members easier, simplifying compliance and audit processes. In Pennsylvania, we're putting in thousands of hours. Drata improves our security posture by reducing extra work, allowing us to focus on other security directives. I like the control editing and task management features the most. It's easy to use, but it's also easy for people to think they don't need security experts if they have it."

"Drata keeps adding new features, allowing us to build our entire InfoSec program within it. Adding new components and evidence for different audits is easy. Drata also integrates with various software, like ticketing systems, source code control, and cloud platforms, continuously pulling evidence from these integrations. Without a GRC tool with these integrations, we used to gather evidence from different software during audits manually. Drata has a significant impact on our security posture management. Previously, Drata had features for security posture management, primarily through integration with AWS. For example, it would scan AWS for specific security requirements, like ensuring all S3 buckets are private. It will be reported on the Drata platform if it finds a public bucket. Recently, Drata introduced a new feature that uses an infrastructure-as-code approach. This feature detects issues and provides AI-generated suggestions for fixing them. If an organization uses infrastructure-as-code solutions like Terraform, Drata will suggest changes to the Terraform code to address the issues. You can then review and apply these changes to fix the problems. This is particularly useful when dealing with many topics, as it helps automate and speed up the process of implementing fixes. However, this AI-generated code feature is part of Drata’s upsell options. The basic version of Drata offers limited capabilities compared to the advanced features available with a paid upgrade. Even without this new feature, Drata's security posture management is valuable, as it scans cloud environments for deviations from defined security baselines. Many tools offer similar capabilities, but Drata’s new feature that translates issues into actionable fixes is a notable advancement. This benefits teams with the capability and resources to use this tool effectively."

"Drata helped us publish our ISO and SOC reports, which was essential for the acquisition. The challenge now is whether Drata can scale up to meet the needs of a larger company, which already has tools like Intune to enforce laptop encryption. Drata is excellent for startups and small—to medium-sized companies but may face challenges in larger organizations with multiple environments."

"My experience with customer support was good; they were responsive, but they didn't ever get us to a solution that worked."

"The way the tool's controls are linked to the framework, specifically with SAST and HIPAA frameworks or any other frameworks, is really good."

"Drata offers APIs for every clause so that it can integrate into various platforms."

"The product is 100 percent friendly to use."

Cons

"They take time to respond or coordinate a meeting since they maintain a schedule that does not fit Latin America very well."

"The security of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management could improve. There are always new security issues coming out."

"I would like them to include support for their products in languages other than English."

"I’d like to see more integration with third-party tools. For example, it would be helpful to have an integration between Dome9 and ServiceNow to manage security incidents and security changes."

"Currently, I would like this solution extended to cellular devices or tablets."

"Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required."

"Their service needs improvement."

"We're looking for a solution that can incorporate legacy infrastructure for some of our business needs."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP cons

"The existing features of Drata are already extensive and costly to integrate."

"One of the challenges with Drata is that if you're paying for a subscription to ISO 27001, you must undergo a risk assessment. You should have access to all necessary modules on the platform to achieve your compliance posture and certification."

"The product can improve in its API documentation area."

"There is room for improvement in Drata. The core features are solid, but some new features are in a very MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. They work, but the user experience isn't always smooth. While the core features are well-developed compared to the market, the new features need more polish. They could benefit from more user feedback and iterations to make them more useful. Some of these new features look promising buthave flaws, so we can’t fully adopt them or justify paying extra for them now. The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set updifferent integrations."

"The thing with Drata is you cannot open multiple tabs on the same interface or the same desktop,"

"In terms of improvements, I'd suggest better marketing since the industry tends to market these tools as security experts, which isn't true."

"Drata has impacted our organization negatively, as it made the whole compliance process more complicated and cost me significant time."

"The solution is quite costly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is a little bit high."

"The license fee is high."

"It is a very straightforward licensing model that is based on the number of assets you are discovering and managing with the solution."

"The licensing part still needs some work. The issue that I have is that we do not use all the services in the cloud, but sometimes, CloudGuard identifies them as an asset."

"The tool's pricing is moderate. Its licensing costs are yearly."

"We have the enterprise-level license and we renew it annually because it is worth the cost."

"The price is on the higher end."

"Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is expensive."

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP pricing and cost advice

"Drata's pricing is quite reasonable. Compared to other tools in the market, including its biggest competitor, Vanta, Drata is much cheaper. Even compared to other tools like AuditBoard, which aren’t as good, Drata’s price remains competitive."

"I remember that my company used to pay 25,000 USD to use the product...The product's cost is really high, but it is a powerful tool."

"It's one of the more expensive options, but I think it's worth the money if you can afford it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compliance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard Workload Protection?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing model is flexible and consumption-based, which makes it easier to align with our cloud. The setup cost was moderate, not to...

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence?

The new scanning function is a valuable feature that wasn't available until recently.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence?

There is a lack of functionalities and usability. I used to compare it with another solution that is focused on specific features. All solutions have some gaps, and we are looking for the best one ...

What needs improvement with Drata?

Drata helped us manage our SOC 2 compliance by automating the monitoring of our infrastructure, but overall, the platform didn't work effectively at all. Being fairly new SOC 2 compliance, understa...

What is your primary use case for Drata?

Our main use case for Drata is to provide a platform for us to manage our SOC 2 compliance.

What advice do you have for others considering Drata?

My advice to others looking into using Drata is that I would advise them not to use it. I would rate Drata a 1 out of five because the platform requires that you be a compliance expert and doesn't ...

Wiz vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Competitors

Vanta vs Drata

Compared 43% of the time

Thoropass vs Drata

Compared 15% of the time

Sprinto vs Drata

Compared 11% of the time

Secureframe Comply vs Drata

Compared 6% of the time

Hyperproof vs Drata

Compared 6% of the time

More Drata Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP

October 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP product report

Download Drata product report

October 2025

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, Dome9, Check Point CloudGuard Workload Protection, Check Point CloudGuard Intelligence

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers comprehensive cloud security with features like dynamic access control, asset protection, and compliance checks, tailored for organizations seeking enhanced governance across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms.

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP provides robust capabilities, including centralized firewall management, IAM scanning, and real-time visibility. Its strengths lie in predictive visualization, threat intelligence, and auto-remediation, making it a valuable tool for risk mitigation and compliance management. The platform's integration and responsiveness enhance cloud security, ensuring alignment with industry standards and effective threat protection.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?

Dynamic Access Control: Enables granular security permissions for cloud resources.
Asset Protection: Safeguards cloud assets from unauthorized access and threats.
Compliance Checks: Ensures alignment with industry regulations like PCI DSS and SOC 2.
Centralized Firewall Management: Simplifies firewall rule configuration across cloud environments.
IAM Scanning: Audits and secures identity and access management configurations.
Real-Time Visibility: Provides insights into cloud environments for proactive threat detection.

What benefits and ROI should you expect from Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?

Threat Intelligence: Identifies and mitigates potential risks before exploitation.
Auto-Remediation: Automates responses to security incidents, reducing manual intervention.
Intuitive Interface: Simplifies management and enhances operational efficiency.
Posture Management: Maintains strong security posture through continuous assessment.

Organizations in finance, healthcare, and retail frequently implement Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP for compliance and security across cloud environments. It assists with workload protection, threat detection, and regulatory obligation fulfillment, proving effective for securing applications and monitoring API interactions.

Check Point Software Technologies

Drata is a powerful tool for automating compliance processes, effectively reducing audit preparation time and continuously monitoring security controls. It is highly valued for its ability to integrate seamlessly with existing tech stacks and manage security for remote teams, ensuring adherence to standards like SOC 2 and HIPAA. Drata enhances organizational efficiency, improves workflows, and supports real-time compliance monitoring, making compliance management less stressful and more accurate.

Sample Customers

Symantec, Citrix, Car and Driver, Virgin, Cloud Technology Partners

Information Not Available