Everlaw and Casepoint are competitors in the legal tech market. Everlaw appears to have an edge in search capabilities and collaborative tools, while Casepoint has a stronger hold in comprehensive analytics and scalability.
Features: Everlaw offers efficient search functions, collaborative tools, and streamlined workflows. Casepoint is equipped with comprehensive analytics, granular control, and scalability suitable for large datasets.
Room for Improvement: Everlaw could improve export functionalities, flexibility with integrations, and customization options. Casepoint's areas for enhancement include data processing speed, simplifying complex features, and faster load times for sizable files.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Everlaw is known for straightforward implementation and responsive support. Casepoint may require more setup time but provides valuable customer service post-deployment.
Pricing and ROI: Everlaw is seen as having competitive pricing with a quick ROI. Casepoint involves a higher initial investment yet offers substantial long-term benefits and ROI.
Casepoint is a technology company focused on the digital transformation of litigation discovery. Casepoint’s cloud-based eDiscovery platform removes significant barriers from the discovery process, enabling legal teams to focus on the art of litigation. Features of Casepoint include a full-strength review platform with artificial intelligence pre-installed, cloud analytics and collections, and robust data processing capabilities all in a single technology platform. Based in the United States and with offices in three continents, Casepoint is repeatedly chosen by leading law firms, multinational corporations, and public sector clients for their largest, end-to-end discovery needs. Casepoint is smarter legal working.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.