Bugcrowd vs Cortex Xpanse comparison

Bugcrowd and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. Bugcrowd is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. Bugcrowd holds a 5.5% mindshare in ASM, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bugcrowd users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Bugcrowd

Read 4 Bugcrowd reviews

2,214 Views
996 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cortex Xpanse

Read 6 Cortex Xpanse reviews

1,133 Views
1,122 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bugcrowd

Cortex Xpanse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Bugcrowd and Cortex Xpanse are competing products in the cybersecurity space. Bugcrowd seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive crowd-sourced security testing, providing expert-driven insights.

Features: Bugcrowd can harness a large community of security researchers to find vulnerabilities, offers flexible testing options, and has targeted assessment capabilities. Cortex Xpanse provides comprehensive asset discovery, continuous monitoring, and real-time risk management, helping organizations see their entire external attack surface.

Room for Improvement: Bugcrowd could enhance its automated processes, streamline report creation further, and expand researcher engagement. Cortex Xpanse might need improvements in support service flexibility, deployment customization, and enhancing user training programs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bugcrowd is noted for seamless integration with existing systems and personalized support. Cortex Xpanse offers automated deployment processes, reducing manual interventions but may rely on more standardized support systems.

Pricing and ROI: Bugcrowd involves variable costs tied to specific programs and offers considerable ROI through vulnerability insights. Cortex Xpanse follows a structured pricing model, aligning with its operational intelligence capabilities promising sustained long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Bugcrowd vs. Cortex Xpanse Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bugcrowd vs. Cortex Xpanse

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bugcrowd

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (13th), Bug Bounty Platforms (2nd), Penetration Testing Services (4th)

Cortex Xpanse

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Bugcrowd is 5.5%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cortex Xpanse is 3.8%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cortex Xpanse	3.8%
Bugcrowd	5.5%
Other	90.7%

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Featured Reviews

Faizan Nehal

dApp Auditor at Hacken

Long list of potential reports supports practical skill development

The most valuable aspect of Bugcrowd is that it provides a long list of different websites or web applications where I can report vulnerabilities. Bugcrowd ensures that if vulnerabilities are reported through their platform, payment is guaranteed. Additionally, the platform aids in transferring money directly into my bank account, making the entire process smooth. Working on Bugcrowd has made me a better security engineer since it provides a competitive environment to report successful vulnerabilities.

Read full review

Ali Mohamed

Account Manager at Cairo International Airport Co.

Proactively manages security and identifies vulnerabilities with good alerts

We use Cortex Xpanse as a security control for attack surface management in our organization When there is an alert from Cortex Xpanse regarding a certificate or surface, it prompts us to take immediate action. It checks vulnerabilities periodically, ensuring they are addressed, which helps in…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would rate Bugcrowd a ten out of ten."

"One of the features I like most about Bugcrowd is the ability to create a report in a very easy way."

"Bugcrowd's support team is very active and supportive."

"Working on Bugcrowd has made me a better security engineer since it provides a competitive environment to report successful vulnerabilities."

"I believe Bugcrowd is highly stable."

"The most valuable aspect of Bugcrowd is that it provides a long list of different websites or web applications where I can report vulnerabilities."

"Bugcrowd has programs that disclose rewards and invite researchers to new programs."

"As an attack surface manager, I highly recommend Cortex Xpanse, especially if there are many services exposed publicly on the internet."

"The best feature of the product is that it's easy to manage when we have set it up, and the beneficial impact of Cortex Xpanse for the company is security."

"The most valuable aspect is its ability to catch trojans and malware."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its firewall and antivirus."

"Cortex Xpanse has an easy-to-use user interface."

"The most valuable aspect is its ability to catch trojans and malware."

"When there is an alert from Cortex Xpanse regarding a certificate or surface, it prompts us to take immediate action."

"Cortex Xpanse is a strong solution for attack surface management, including digital brand protection and continuous monitoring."

Cons

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago. It now takes more time to resolve a reported vulnerability and receive the payout."

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago."

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets."

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets. If this time could be minimized, it would be very helpful."

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them."

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them. They should improve the responsibility type and response time of their customer support, especially when the issue is urgent."

"Cortex Xpanse should offer better customization and configuration options on its dashboard."

"Regarding technical support, I would rate it as a seven."

"Some improvements are needed in the user interface."

"It's challenging to confirm the absolute coverage and penetration of Cortex Xpanse into the Dark Web. The solution lacks comprehensive intelligence on adversaries and risks, which other competitors might provide."

"Cortex Xpanse needs to add dark-web scanning."

"Some improvements are needed in the user interface. It may require more enhancements."

"There is an issue with the old versions of Cortex, and so when we have an older one with Windows or any OS, we have a problem with its connectivity with the cloud."

"Cortex Xpanse should offer better customization and configuration options on its dashboard."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The tool's cost is too high."

"Cortex Xpanse is cheaper than other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bugcrowd?

I understand the pricing, and it involves rewards of at least one thousand dollars.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bugcrowd?

The tool itself could be improved. I hope to improve next time and perform better.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bugcrowd?

I use Bugcrowd ( /products/bugcrowd-reviews ) for finding bugs and vulnerabilities. I have been using it for two years. Besides Bugcrowd ( /products/bugcrowd-reviews ), I also use HackerOne ( /prod...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex Xpanse?

I don't know the licensing or setup cost; I have no idea about the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cortex Xpanse?

I'm not sure right now; I have nothing to comment on regarding what could be improved in the product. We are using it and we are satisfied. I have nothing to comment right now on what other feature...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cortex Xpanse?

Cortex Xpanse is usually used for security from clients.

See all answers

Comparisons

HackerOne vs Bugcrowd

Compared 60% of the time

Synack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 19% of the time

YesWeHack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 9% of the time

Intigriti vs Bugcrowd

Compared 5% of the time

Crowdcurity vs Bugcrowd

Compared 3% of the time

More Bugcrowd Competitors

Tenable Attack Surface Management vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 25% of the time

Bitsight vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 16% of the time

CyCognito vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 13% of the time

Mandiant Advantage vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 12% of the time

Censys Attack Surface Management vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 9% of the time

More Cortex Xpanse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP)

January 2025

Download Bugcrowd product report

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

October 2025

Download Cortex Xpanse product report

Overview

By combining a vast and diverse workforce with a results-driven model, crowdsourced security programs outperform traditional methods-every time.

Bugcrowd

Xpanse provides a complete, accurate and continuously updated inventory of all global internet-facing assets. This allows you to discover, evaluate, and mitigate cyber attack surface risks. You can also evaluate supplier risk and assess the security of acquired companies.
Manual asset inventory maintenance is slow and prone to error. An outside-in view of your attack surface catches assets and exposures you never knew existed to help with attack surface reduction.

Get ahead of your ransomware risk assessment by discovering and remediating RDP exposures, the leading attack vector in ransomware attacks. Find exposed assets before attackers do.

Integration with Cortex XSOAR, Prisma Cloud, and our broader portfolio allows our ASM findings to enhance security workflows, and secure unknown, unmanaged risks on your cloud attack surface.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Zephyr Health, Barracuda Networks, Western Union, Instructure, Aruba Networks, Pinterest, CARD.com, WINK, (ISC)2, StatusPage, WHMCS, Movember

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bugcrowd vs. Cortex Xpanse

September 2025

Free Report: Bugcrowd vs. Cortex Xpanse

Find out what your peers are saying about Bugcrowd vs. Cortex Xpanse and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bugcrowd vs. Cortex Xpanse report.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.