Board vs CCH Tagetik comparison

Board International and Wolters Kluwer are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Board International is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Wolters Kluwer is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.0. Board International holds a 5.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to Wolters Kluwer’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Board International users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Wolters Kluwer users who would recommend it.

Board

Read 37 Board reviews

1,812 Views
1,015 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CCH Tagetik

Read 7 CCH Tagetik reviews

1,564 Views
1,142 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Board

CCH Tagetik

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Board and CCH Tagetik are competitors in the corporate performance management sector. CCH Tagetik generally has the upper hand due to its broader range of features making it suitable for organizations seeking comprehensive capabilities, while Board is recognized for competitive pricing strategies and customer support.

Features: Board offers intuitive drag-and-drop functionality for simplified modeling and analysis, along with flexible customization without needing IT assistance, and features like data visualization and real-time data updates. CCH Tagetik provides advanced financial consolidation, planning, and sophisticated reporting features with deep analytical capabilities, allowing integration and automatic loading from Oracle systems and efficient workflow management.

Room for Improvement: Board could enhance its reporting capabilities and increase scalability options to support larger enterprises, improve integration with third-party applications, and offer more out-of-the-box solutions to reduce customization time. CCH Tagetik may work on reducing its learning curve for non-financial users, streamline workflow processes for easier design and implementation, and offer clearer guidance on system design to prevent overly detailed configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Board provides a flexible deployment with quick setup times and responsive customer support, allowing for efficient integration and assistance during implementation. CCH Tagetik offers robust cloud and on-premise deployment options with detailed implementation guidance, focusing on thorough support and assistance for complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: Board offers competitive pricing appealing to budget-conscious businesses and achieves favorable ROI due to its quick deployment and user-friendly features. CCH Tagetik requires a higher initial investment justified by its comprehensive features, providing substantial ROI for users needing in-depth capabilities, particularly in complex financial environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. CCH Tagetik Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. CCH Tagetik

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,701 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Board

Ranking in Business Performance Management

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (21st), Reporting (17th)

CCH Tagetik

Ranking in Business Performance Management

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Financial Close Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Board is 5.5%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CCH Tagetik is 6.7%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Board	5.5%
CCH Tagetik	6.7%
Other	87.8%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Wiboon Thabsuwan

Senior Consultant at IMD Company Limited

Easy to use and requires less time to learn or understand its features

I think the product is good in terms of ease of use. The interface looks really nice and very easy to use. Every command appears in the icon. It looks like you don't have to understand everything about the command. You do not necessarily have to know more, or I would say that there is less time for our study about the products. Functionality-wise, it is quite easy to use and requires less time to understand or learn about the product. I am a software vendor, so I do not use the tool myself. I use it for my clients. My clients mostly use it for budgeting and timing purposes. I would say that's really less maintenance at all because they can do everything by themselves. It is good in terms of ease of use.

Read full review

Julia Lupidii

Senior EPM Consultant at Solution BI France

User-friendly performance management with intuitive approach

I appreciate its user-friendliness, especially for business users who may not be very tech-savvy. In many organizations, there's a mix of IT professionals and business users with varying levels of technical expertise. One of the strengths of the solution includes a feature similar to SmartView, is that it allows users to work with Excel. Since Excel is a widely familiar tool, it reduces the learning curve and makes it more accessible to a broader audience within the organization. The workflow feature within the solution is particularly valuable. It simplifies complex processes into a step-by-step sequence, making it easy for users to follow along.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I liked the way that I felt as a user and administrator of it. There were a lot of clicks, drops, drags, etc. versus writing code."

"I think it's flexible. I chose this solution because, even though it wasn't out-of-the-box, you can customize it, and the long-term growth potential of the software is where I see the value."

"The ability to create a data model and have it in testing within a week is fantastic."

"It allows people to quickly create dashboards with reports."

"We have better reporting and have been able to better track performance."

"All staff can now see their relevant scorecards online."

"I think the product is good in terms of ease of use."

"Primary valuable features are its flexibility and versatility and, obviously, functionality goes along with that. Plus, it does that at a small footprint in the file servers, and does it very efficiently."

More Board pros

"The ability for integration and automatic loading from the Oracle system into CCH Tagetik is very valuable."

"I've primarily worked with CCH Tagetik as a consultant, handling implementations and not providing day-to-day user support. I initially appreciated the unified platform, the Ownership Structure Register, which benefits certain entities. The workflow feature is great, but it can become overly detailed and lacks clear guidance on design. The solution is good in terms of storage."

"I appreciate its user-friendliness, especially for business users who may not be very tech-savvy."

"The most valuable feature of CCH Tagetik is form creation."

"Has an APM, which deals with the details of data and has calculation functions included."

Cons

"The product can be improved by making it possible to know where cubes are used."

"The engine of the Board should be made powerful like the engine of IBM planning which is more powerful in terms of performance. The consolidated finance area also needs improvement."

"Building similar models entirely from scratch could be made quicker with transfer abilities between databases and capsules."

"It would be huge in the future if BOARD offered a lot more graphs and presentations, and it was a lot easier to use."

"It can have more functionality for narrative reporting. They should also improve their training courses, which are currently very lightweight. When you get into more complex things, it is quite difficult to figure out what you're supposed to do, and you have to look at a lot of videos before you actually understand, which is a bit frustrating. Their training can be more comprehensive."

"I would like to see better relationships with the partners."

"The initial setup was very complex for us."

"We can't delete entities and cubes in Boards because it interrupts our whole data model."

More Board cons

"We faced difficulties while uploading data."

"There is a need for improvement in the ability to generate all reports from one click, like both P&L and balance sheets, to be available together in Excel."

"The tool's major drawback is the ETL process, which is not up to par with other solutions."

"There is room for improvement, especially on the settings side of the solution."

"Analytics function is weak. Other products have sum(irate) function and forecasting help function, but Tagetik does not have this clarity."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."

"Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."

"It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."

"In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."

"The tool's price is a bit high compared to other solutions."

"The solution's pricing is affordable."

"The solution is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Is Board better than Anaplan as a Business Intelligence (BI) solution?

We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and simu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Board?

All the reports are prepared automatically.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Board?

Board's integration could be a bit more robust, but what we have works. If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance.

See all answers

What do you like most about CCH Tagetik?

I've primarily worked with CCH Tagetik as a consultant, handling implementations and not providing day-to-day user support. I initially appreciated the unified platform, the Ownership Structure Reg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CCH Tagetik?

I am not informed about pricing, but CCH Tagetik was chosen over HFM due to more comprehensive functionalities related to IFRS 17. For larger companies, pricing might be less important compared to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CCH Tagetik?

There is a need for improvement in the ability to generate all reports from one click, like both P&L and balance sheets, to be available together in Excel. It would also be helpful if the syste...

See all answers

Comparisons

Anaplan vs Board

Compared 23% of the time

Pigment vs Board

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Board

Compared 10% of the time

Jedox vs Board

Compared 9% of the time

Syncfusion Report Platform vs Board

Compared 5% of the time

More Board Competitors

Oracle HFM vs CCH Tagetik

Compared 18% of the time

Anaplan vs CCH Tagetik

Compared 17% of the time

OneStream XF vs CCH Tagetik

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs CCH Tagetik

Compared 9% of the time

LucaNet vs CCH Tagetik

Compared 4% of the time

More CCH Tagetik Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Board

October 2025

Download Board product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Performance Management

October 2025

Download CCH Tagetik product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tagetik

Overview

BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

Board International

CCH Tagetik goes beyond basic CPM. By aligning financial and operational data in a unified platform, our software ensures you're working with a single version of the truth. The result is faster financial processes and a complete view of your entire organization.

Wolters Kluwer

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB

Daimler, Randstad, Rabobank, Metro Group

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. CCH Tagetik

September 2025

Free Report: Board vs. CCH Tagetik

Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. CCH Tagetik and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Board vs. CCH Tagetik report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.