BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS vs CloverETL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Javlin Logo
287 views|245 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS and CloverETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Database Development and Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it.""I have worked with DB2's great features in the last five years. The IDAA feature transformed the vision of warehousing, business analytics, and big data at my bank. Besides the mainframe, I saw that this solution was evolutionary. It gives real-time information."

More BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS Pros →

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use.""Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility.""No dependence on native language and ease of use.​​""Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

More CloverETL Pros →

Cons
"One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution.""DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works."

More BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS Cons →

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server.""Its documentation could be improved.​""​Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough.​"

More CloverETL Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it.
Top Answer:One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution. As someone involved in managing infrastructure, understanding… more »
Top Answer:From my perspective as an infrastructure guy, the most valuable aspect of BMC's data management solutions was their ability to optimize CPU cycles, improving IMS performance without directly impacting… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
168
Comparisons
155
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
433
Rating
8.0
60th
out of 100 in Data Integration
Views
287
Comparisons
245
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS, Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS
Learn More
Overview

Transform the management of your DB2 databases to meet the scale and complexity of digital business

  • Run DB2 utilities with BMC Next Generation Technology to optimize your data and improve application performance
  • Eliminate downtime and increase availability of business services
  • Ensure the integrity of structured and unstructured data
  • Take control with intelligent automation and policy-driven rules
  • Bridge the gap from green-screen to modern, secure, self-service user interfaces
  • Move to DB2 12 and beyond with confidence
CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.
Sample Customers
Airline Tariff Publishing Co (ATPCO), AtTask, MetaScale
IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm27%
Insurance Company13%
Government11%
Manufacturing Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Database Development and Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS is ranked 21st in Database Development and Management with 2 reviews while CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration. BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS is rated 8.6, while CloverETL is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS writes "Improves disaster recovery processes and offers an efficient CPU cycle optimization ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate and IBM App Connect, whereas CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework and Talend Open Studio.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.