BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs CloudCheckr comparison

BMC and Spot are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. BMC is ranked #39, while Spot is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0. BMC holds a 0.8% mindshare in CM, compared to Spot’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Spot users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

259 Views
122 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

448 Views
215 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and CloudCheckr are competing in the cloud management domain. While BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is favored for its enterprise-level pricing and support, CloudCheckr has an edge with its robust feature set, especially in cost optimization and compliance.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers strong automation, comprehensive resource management, and enterprise scalability. CloudCheckr provides advanced cost optimization, detailed compliance tracking, and intuitive financial insights.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could improve in reducing complexity, enhancing ease of use, and streamlining its deployment process. CloudCheckr might benefit from expanding its automation features, improving scalability to match enterprise needs, and offering more integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management presents a complex deployment suitable for enterprises, emphasizing customization with comprehensive documentation. CloudCheckr offers a simple deployment model focused on user experience, complemented by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management involves higher initial costs due to its enterprise-grade features but focuses on long-term ROI. CloudCheckr provides lower upfront costs, with quick ROI through cost savings and budget management.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. CloudCheckr Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. CloudCheckr

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Management

39th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (45th)

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

28th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (10th), Managed Cloud Services (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudCheckr is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

Cons

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 61% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 39% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 19% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 13% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 10% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

June 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

June 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. CloudCheckr

June 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. CloudCheckr

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. CloudCheckr and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. CloudCheckr report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.