Betty Blocks vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

Betty Blocks and GitHub are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Betty Blocks is ranked #34, while GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. Betty Blocks holds a 0.3% mindshare in RADS, compared to GitHub’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Betty Blocks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Betty Blocks

Read 2 Betty Blocks reviews

322 Views
293 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Read 29 GitHub CoPilot reviews

4,315 Views
2,977 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Betty Blocks

GitHub CoPilot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Betty Blocks and GitHub Copilot compete in software development tools. GitHub Copilot seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and productivity enhancements for experienced developers.

Features: Betty Blocks provides a no-code platform that facilitates rapid application development with visual modeling and integration capabilities. It allows non-technical users to build applications easily. GitHub Copilot integrates with development environments using machine learning to suggest code snippets, enhancing productivity and efficiency for professional developers by delivering real-time intelligent code suggestions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Betty Blocks, as a cloud-based service, offers an intuitive deployment process with a comprehensive customer support system available through multiple channels. GitHub Copilot, as an extension for environments like VS Code, offers seamless integration but provides limited customer service options, benefiting from its simple deployment due to its integration nature.

Pricing and ROI: Betty Blocks offers reasonable pricing suited for its no-code capabilities, potentially leading to significant ROI by accelerating market entry. GitHub Copilot operates on a subscription model, focusing on productivity enhancement, which is valuable for coding-intensive teams despite potentially higher costs, offering justified ROI through increased coding efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Betty Blocks

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No-Code Development Platforms (29th)

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Betty Blocks is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 6.1%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	6.1%
Betty Blocks	0.3%
Other	93.6%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Hans De Groot

Owner/Operator at Informatieewerkplaats

The solution is stable and has good support, but is expensive

Betty Blocks, when I started with it, was similar to a back-end platform with the ability to have a standardized back-office UI out of the box, which is perfect for a lot of situations. For more customer-facing UIs, we had to create the front end ourselves, building endpoints with HTML and JavaScript. Then Betty Blocks started in 2018 with the page builder. This allowed us to create drag-and-drop interfaces. That was quite cumbersome. Now Betty Blocks is entering a new generation of it - next generation forms - which should be a lot better. The most valuable feature is the back end. The way we can create action flows for things such as sending emails, creating PDF reports, or connecting to web services is very complete. I never experience a lack of functionality in it. The standardized back-office UI is said to be deprecated over time, which is a shame, because it is a real time-saver and is one of their strong points, only if it was kept up-to-date.

Read full review

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration

In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the back end."

"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."

"The product is easy to integrate."

"GitHub CoPilot is easy to use even for beginners and it supports the integration with CI/CD tools."

"The solution increases coding efficiency."

"The platform's most valuable feature is detecting and suggesting variables based on the existing file context."

"It enhances efficiency and productivity in development."

"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."

"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

Cons

"What I find lacking in the software is its ability to query the database."

"In many cases, they make choices where flexibility is a little bit degraded, but if you leave everything open and the flexibility is great then the usability is a little bit less."

"I would like to see full integration with AI."

"While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections."

"One drawback is that the solution sometimes suggests unwanted code, especially if I accidentally press the tab. This doesn't happen often. Sometimes it seems to understand my code, but other times it doesn't. This inconsistency is confusing."

"If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load."

"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."

"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."

"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."

"The only suggestion is to enhance Copilot's ability to assist developers with infrastructure as code tasks. Like, while using CI/CD pipeline, when I use YAML files, so it could just support the port number."

"I don't have enough experience to share this kind of feedback."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite high, but the pricing is also not very transparent."

"The pricing structure that we have been working with was based on a number of blocks."

"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."

"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."

"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."

"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."

"The solution is costly."

"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...

See all answers

Comparisons

OutSystems vs Betty Blocks

Compared 100% of the time

More Betty Blocks Competitors

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 26% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 8% of the time

Qodo Gen vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

September 2025

Download Betty Blocks product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

September 2025

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Overview

From mobile apps to (customer) portals to back office management and everything in between. The Betty Blocks platform’s ease of use supports every size or complexity of your app. Go as far as you like, the easiest way possible.

Betty Blocks

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Sample Customers

KPMG, TELE2, Sligro Food Group, Ymere, Flexpoint Group

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot

September 2025

Free Report: Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot

Find out what your peers are saying about Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.