Betty Blocks vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

Betty Blocks and GitHub are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Betty Blocks is ranked #36, while GitHub is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1. Betty Blocks holds a 0.8% mindshare in RADS, compared to GitHub’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Betty Blocks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Betty Blocks

Read 2 Betty Blocks reviews

519 Views
384 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Read 31 GitHub CoPilot reviews

4,494 Views
2,921 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Betty Blocks

GitHub CoPilot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Betty Blocks and GitHub Copilot compete in software development tools. GitHub Copilot seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and productivity enhancements for experienced developers.

Features: Betty Blocks provides a no-code platform that facilitates rapid application development with visual modeling and integration capabilities. It allows non-technical users to build applications easily. GitHub Copilot integrates with development environments using machine learning to suggest code snippets, enhancing productivity and efficiency for professional developers by delivering real-time intelligent code suggestions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Betty Blocks, as a cloud-based service, offers an intuitive deployment process with a comprehensive customer support system available through multiple channels. GitHub Copilot, as an extension for environments like VS Code, offers seamless integration but provides limited customer service options, benefiting from its simple deployment due to its integration nature.

Pricing and ROI: Betty Blocks offers reasonable pricing suited for its no-code capabilities, potentially leading to significant ROI by accelerating market entry. GitHub Copilot operates on a subscription model, focusing on productivity enhancement, which is valuable for coding-intensive teams despite potentially higher costs, offering justified ROI through increased coding efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Betty Blocks

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No-Code Development Platforms (18th)

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Betty Blocks is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 4.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	4.7%
Betty Blocks	0.8%
Other	94.5%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Hans De Groot

Owner/Operator at Informatieewerkplaats

The solution is stable and has good support, but is expensive

Betty Blocks, when I started with it, was similar to a back-end platform with the ability to have a standardized back-office UI out of the box, which is perfect for a lot of situations. For more customer-facing UIs, we had to create the front end ourselves, building endpoints with HTML and JavaScript. Then Betty Blocks started in 2018 with the page builder. This allowed us to create drag-and-drop interfaces. That was quite cumbersome. Now Betty Blocks is entering a new generation of it - next generation forms - which should be a lot better. The most valuable feature is the back end. The way we can create action flows for things such as sending emails, creating PDF reports, or connecting to web services is very complete. I never experience a lack of functionality in it. The standardized back-office UI is said to be deprecated over time, which is a shame, because it is a real time-saver and is one of their strong points, only if it was kept up-to-date.

Read full review

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages

Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the back end."

"Copilot enhanced our productivity through its AI capabilities."

"GitHub Copilot code suggestion capabilities are always good."

"GitHub Copilot can improve productivity by up to 40%, especially for experienced developers. Senior developers often spend more time reviewing code, which can make the code review process a bit longer."

"I use it almost like a search engine, but it goes a step beyond."

"There is absolutely a humongous return on investment with GitHub CoPilot in my organization."

"Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs."

"The initial setup of the product is easy."

"Things which were taking like two days are now finished within half an hour."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

Cons

"In many cases, they make choices where flexibility is a little bit degraded, but if you leave everything open and the flexibility is great then the usability is a little bit less."

"I would like to see full integration with AI."

"What I find lacking in the software is its ability to query the database."

"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."

"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."

"One drawback is that the solution sometimes suggests unwanted code, especially if I accidentally press the tab. This doesn't happen often. Sometimes it seems to understand my code, but other times it doesn't. This inconsistency is confusing."

"Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs."

"There is a lot of hallucination happening in GitHub CoPilot sometimes; on one side, it provides production-grade environment code, but on the other side, it lacks understanding the context of what I tell it and hallucinates a lot."

"GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code."

"It would be useful if we could use the solution to create documents, not only prompts."

"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing structure that we have been working with was based on a number of blocks."

"The pricing is quite high, but the pricing is also not very transparent."

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."

"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."

"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."

"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."

"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."

"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."

"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

For now, I think it is okay. It is not that expensive. The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

See all answers

Comparisons

OutSystems vs Betty Blocks

Compared 55% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Betty Blocks

Compared 25% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs Betty Blocks

Compared 20% of the time

More Betty Blocks Competitors

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 19% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

January 2026

Download Betty Blocks product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

January 2026

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Overview

From mobile apps to (customer) portals to back office management and everything in between. The Betty Blocks platform’s ease of use supports every size or complexity of your app. Go as far as you like, the easiest way possible.

Betty Blocks

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Sample Customers

KPMG, TELE2, Sligro Food Group, Ymere, Flexpoint Group

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot

December 2025

Free Report: Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot

Find out what your peers are saying about Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Betty Blocks vs. GitHub CoPilot report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.