Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Backupify Google Workspace Backup vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Backupify and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Backupify is ranked #57, while NetApp is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.1. Backupify holds a 0.4% mindshare in CB, compared to NetApp’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Backupify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.
Backupify Google Workspace ...
Read 2 Backupify Google Workspace Backup reviews
  • 500 Views
  • 330 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Read 63 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews
  • 4,403 Views
  • 616 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and Backupify Google Workspace Backup compete in cloud storage and data protection. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP has an advantage in data management flexibility and storage efficiency, while Backupify Google Workspace Backup stands out in integration with Google services.

Features: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers robust data management tools, efficient storage utilization, and flexible cloud integration. Backupify Google Workspace Backup features automated data backup, quick recovery, and strong integration with Google Workspace for seamless functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP involves a complex deployment model but is supported by extensive technical documentation and professional support. Backupify Google Workspace Backup provides a straightforward deployment catered to Google Workspace environments, complemented by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP has a higher initial setup cost with promises of long-term ROI through efficient data management. Backupify Google Workspace Backup offers a lower entry cost, making it a cost-effective solution for small to medium enterprises focused on Google Workspace continuity.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Backupify Google Workspace Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Backupify Google Workspace Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Backupify Google Workspace ...
Ranking in Cloud Backup
57th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
SaaS Backup (30th)
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Ranking in Cloud Backup
13th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (2nd), Cloud Storage (1st), Public Cloud Storage Services (8th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Backupify Google Workspace Backup is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Backup Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP0.7%
Backupify Google Workspace Backup0.4%
Other98.9%
Cloud Backup
 

Featured Reviews

IM
Inexpensive, easy to configure, good support, and it is easy to scale up when needed
The most valuable feature is the interface, which is very nice to work with. Whether you're working on the appliance itself, or you're working on the cloud, it is basically the same interface. It got to the point where when we needed to recover a file, we didn't look at the backup solution anymore. Instead, we went right to the Datto Backupify. Using Backupify took our time to recover from probably four days to 20 minutes. With this device, you're capable of logging into the interface or through an IP address to access the data that is stored on it. Recovery can be just a matter of spinning up a virtual machine or doing a full bare metal recovery, replacing the entire hardware-based server.
Read full review
Punit Waghela - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers advanced features with notable emphasis on innovation
The best features of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP include deduplication, compaction, and autonomous ransomware technology that native cloud storage solutions in AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud do not support. Moreover, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP allows the use of multiple protocols including NFS, CIFS, and iSCSI, whereas native options may only support NFS and iSCSI. Customers already using on-premises NetApp storage such as FAS, AFF, or ASA can experience the same functionality on the cloud with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, which adds significant value. For data protection, customers can take advantage of the Snapshot technology available with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. This technology facilitates data recovery by allowing snapshots to be stored either on the same storage or on a disaster recovery (DR) storage. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP helps us to take snapshots and store them on the same storage, with options for migration or replication of those snapshots to different storage, including on-premises DR storage or other cloud storage, providing excellent disaster recovery capabilities.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the interface, which is very nice to work with."
"The most valuable features are the ease of use and the fact that users themselves can self-provision and recover."
"One of the features our customers like is that it can be used from one cloud provider to another. They can use it from Azure to AWS or vice versa. That way, they don't need to use the same provider for backups. If something goes wrong on the primary site, having the same data in another cloud service provider is important."
"The storage tiering is definitely the most valuable feature... With respect to tiering, the inactive data is pushed to a lower tier where the storage cost is cheap, but the access cost is high."
"The most valuable features are tiering to S3 and being able to turn it on and off, based on a schedule."
"If you have a larger amount of data than normal in cloud, it is easy to provision and maintain. Waiting for the delivery of the controller, the configuration of enclosures, etc., all this stuff is eliminated compared to using on-premise."
"The good thing about NetApp is the features that are available on the cloud are also available on-premises."
"Snapshots are one valuable feature within ONTAP, but CVO's appeal is that it acts just like the on-prem solution. It's the same OS, but in the cloud. We can continue to use ONTAP as we did on-premise."
"There is unified storage, which provides flexibility. It is set up perfectly for performance and provisioning. We are able to monitor everything using a separate application. It provides error and critical warnings that allow us to take immediate action through ONTAP. We are able to manage everything, log a case, and follow up with the support team, who can fix it. That is how it is unified."
"The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site."
More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros
 

Cons

"The device does not allow you to do multiple backups over the whole environment."
"Not a ten because there's always room for improvement."
"NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP should improve its support."
"We would like to have support for high availability in multi-regions."
"There is room for improvement in tier one support, especially with potential language barriers and communication challenges."
"Scale-up and scale-out could be improved. It would be interesting to have multiple HA pairs on one cluster, for example, or to increase the single instances more, from a performance perspective. It would be good to get more performance out of a single HA pair."
"I would like to have more management tools. They are difficult to work with, so I would like them to be a bit more user-friendly."
"In terms of improvement, I would like to see the Azure NetApp Files have the capability of doing SnapMirrors. Azure NetApp Files is, as we know, is an AFF system and it's not used in any of the Microsoft resources. It's basically NetApp hardware, so the best performance you can achieve, but the only reason we can't use that right now is because of the region that it's available in. The second was the SnapMirror capability that we didn't have that we heavily rely on right now."
"I would like to see more aggressive management of the aggregate space. On the Cloud Volumes ONTAP that we use for offsite backup copies, most of the data sits in S3. There are also the EBS volumes on the Cloud Volumes ONTAP itself. Sometimes what happens is that the aggregate size just stays the same. If it allocates 8 terabytes initially, it just stays at 8 terabytes for a long time, even though we're only using 20 percent of that 8 terabytes. NetApp could undersize that more aggressively."
"Cloud Volumes ONTAP's interface could use an overhaul. Sometimes you have to dig around in Cloud Manager a little bit to find certain things. The layout could be more intuitive."
More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The costs were about $1,000 USD to buy the unit in the first place, and then between $250 and $300 per year for support."
"Make sure you investigate what your requirements are going to cost you using the native cloud solutions versus what NetApp is going to cost you, to make sure you have a business case to go with NetApp."
"Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two."
"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer."
"If we wanted to use the AWS solution, we would have to manage two or three different platforms and pay more money than what we should have to pay, as some of the features don't even exist. If we wanted to, we could use AWS cloning, but it is useless because it uses more space, is more expensive, and takes more time."
"The cost is quite high."
"The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."
"If a customer is only using, say, less than 10 terabytes, I don't think CVO would be a good option. A customer using at least 100 or 200 terabytes should get a reasonable price from NetApp."
"The pricing of this solution is definitely higher than what the typical Azure Files and AWS solutions charge, but given the features and the stability NetApp has provided, we are okay with it. We are not complaining about the pricing."
More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise53
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is actually quite reasonable in price compared to other native cloud storage options. For example, a customer using 100 TB of AWS storage would not benefit from deduplica...
See all answers
What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP does have a bit of initial complexity for users who are new to the system. Although it isn't overwhelmingly complex, first-time users may find it challenging until they b...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup vs Backupify Google Workspace Backup Logo
Hornetsecurity 365 Total Backup vs Backupify Google Workspace Backup
Compared 56% of the time
CubeBackup Google Workspace vs Backupify Google Workspace Backup Logo
CubeBackup Google Workspace vs Backupify Google Workspace Backup
Compared 44% of the time
More Backupify Google Workspace Backup Competitors
Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 15% of the time
Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 13% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 9% of the time
Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 9% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 6% of the time
More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloud Backup
September 2025
Backupify Google Workspace Backup reportDownload Backupify Google Workspace Backup product report
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
September 2025
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reportDownload NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO
 

Overview

Backupify Google Workspace Backup provides essential data protection for Google Workspace users, ensuring continuity and security through comprehensive backup and restoration capabilities.

Designed to meet the needs of businesses relying on Google Workspace, Backupify Google Workspace Backup offers automated data protection, minimizing risks of data loss and ensuring compliance with industry standards. It supports seamless restoration functionalities, making it easier for IT administrators to manage and recover data efficiently, while also providing secure storage options to preserve data integrity.

What are the key features of Backupify Google Workspace Backup?
  • Automated Backups: Regular automatic data snapshots reduce manual intervention.
  • Point-in-Time Restorations: Retrieval of data from specific past moments.
  • Security and Compliance: Adheres to stringent security protocols for data safety.
  • Simple Management Interface: Facilitates easy navigation and management of backups.
  • Scalable Options: Flexible plans that grow with business needs.
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
  • Risk Reduction: Lessens potential downtime and data loss incidents.
  • Cost Efficiency: Saves time and resources with automated processes.
  • Data Security: Enhanced security measures protect sensitive business information.
  • User Satisfaction: Reliable backup operations increase confidence among users.

In the healthcare sector, Backupify Google Workspace Backup ensures the protection of patient records, while in finance, it secures sensitive financial data, meeting specific industry compliance requirements. Schools use it to safeguard academic information, ensuring educational continuity and data availability.

Backupify

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp
 

Sample Customers

Two River Technology Group
1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard
Buyer's Guide
Backupify Google Workspace Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
September 2025
Free Report: Backupify Google Workspace Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Find out what your peers are saying about Backupify Google Workspace Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Backupify Google Workspace Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.
See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.