Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] comparison

Microsoft and F5 are both solutions in the Container Security category. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of F5 users who would recommend it.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Read 40 Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) reviews
  • 2,378 Views
  • 785 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 10, 2025

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] and Azure Kubernetes Service compete in cloud-based security and container orchestration. Azure Kubernetes Service, with its feature richness, seems to hold an advantage for comprehensive cloud-native development.

Features: Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers strong threat detection, workload monitoring, and compliance insights, essential for security-focused environments. Azure Kubernetes Service provides robust container orchestration, Microsoft services integration, and easy scalability, creating a versatile development platform.

Room for Improvement: Threat Stack could benefit from expanding beyond security-centric solutions and addressing long-term ROI concerns. Enhancements in customer service support and user interface intuitiveness could improve user experience. Azure Kubernetes Service could improve its pricing structure to better cater to small businesses and enhance support for hybrid cloud setups. Improving offline documentation could further aid deployment ease.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Threat Stack offers a simple cloud-based security setup with continuous monitoring, but may lack broader deployment support. Azure Kubernetes Service benefits from Azure's resources, simplifying scaling with efficient automation tools. It shines in customer support, using Azure's service network for robust assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers competitive pricing, requiring careful evaluation of specialized solution ROI. Azure Kubernetes Service may have higher initial costs but promises greater ROI due to its extensive features and scalability, offering valuable investment returns for many organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Container Security Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Container Security
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.1
The ROI from Azure Kubernetes Service depends on specific use cases, duration of use, and challenges with cost-effectiveness.
Sentiment score
7.3
Threat Stack Cloud Security boosted compliance and revenue, reduced staffing needs, enhanced security, and expanded infrastructure dramatically.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
AKS support ranges from excellent to inadequate, with mixed reviews on response times and issue resolution efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.4
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform's support is praised for responsiveness, precise solutions, and effective communication with technical representatives.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Azure Kubernetes Service offers high scalability and ease of expansion but can be costly for extensive scaling needs.
Sentiment score
8.2
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform is scalable, easy to deploy, and efficient across AWS accounts, with minor configuration concerns.
AKS offers excellent scalability due to its adaptation from Kubernetes.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Azure Kubernetes Service is stable, self-healing, with occasional sync issues, and concerns typically arise from external factors.
Sentiment score
7.5
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is stable and efficient, with minor GUI and agent issues for some users.
From my usage, I would rate its stability as eight to nine out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report
 

Room For Improvement

AKS requires faster alerts, better support, improved cost-efficiency, enhanced UI, streamlined integration, security, monitoring, and simplified deployment.
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform needs UI improvements, better API alignment, and enhanced integrations, especially for serverless and container environments.
When purchasing support directly from RHEL, the price is significantly high.
The costs are rising rapidly, and we have not seen any cost reductions by moving to Azure.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report
 

Setup Cost

Azure Kubernetes Service is costly, with potential $10,000 monthly fees, but offers flexible pricing and valued platform flexibility.
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform offers value with transparent pricing, ranging $15-$20 monthly, seen as competitively priced by users.
Transitioning to Azure did not bring cost reductions; in fact, costs are rising rapidly.
The pricing for Azure Kubernetes Service seems to be around the average, which I would rate as a five out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report
 

Valuable Features

Azure Kubernetes Service excels in integration, scalability, ease of use, security, cost management, and operational efficiency.
Threat Stack Cloud Security platform is esteemed for its configurability, integration, monitoring capabilities, and effective alert management.
The most valuable features of Azure Kubernetes Service are its integration with Kubernetes, offering similar features for a seamless experience.
Since pricing is not a major concern, we chose the best fit for our application, which was specifically designed for this particular platform.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (19th)
Threat Stack Cloud Security...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Shaijith KB - PeerSpot reviewer
Professional services boost confidence but pricing and user-friendliness need attention
We have multiple solutions such as SimpliVity, Nutanix, and DXRail, which are all part of our Ansible-based system. It gives us more confidence and we can control our groups effectively. The solution is not particularly user-friendly for novice administrators, making it challenging to understand certain aspects. Templates are not readily available, requiring users to build their own worksheets and everything from scratch. This is a main decentralization we observe compared to VMware. We have tested various solutions including Rancher, RHEL, Canonical from SUSE, and the bare metal version from RHEL direct. Since pricing is not a major concern, we chose the best fit for our application, which was specifically designed for this particular platform.
Read full review
SC
SecOps program for us, as a smaller company, is amazing; they know what to look for
They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter. Even as part of the SecOps Program, that could be helpful; a quick analysis. They're analyzing our whole infrastructure and saying, "You have one VPC and that doesn't make a lot of sense, that should be multiple VPCs and here's why." The architecture of the servers in whatever cloud-hosting provider you're on could be helpful. Other than that, they should continue to expand on their notifications and on what's a vulnerability. They do a great job of that and we want them to continue to do that. It would be cool, since the agent is already deployed and they know about the server, they know the IP address, and they know what vulnerability is there, for them to test the vulnerability and see if they can actually exploit it. Or, once we patch it, they could double-check that it can't be. I don't know how hard that would be to build. Thinking on it off the top off my head, it could be a little challenging but it could also be highly interesting. It would also be great if we could test a couple of other features like hammering a server with 100 login attempts and see what happens. Real test scenarios could be really helpful. That is probably more something close to what they do with the SOC 2 audit or the report. But more visualization of that, being able to test things out on our infrastructure to make sure we can or can't hit this box could be interesting.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Performing Arts
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?
The platform's high scalability is one of its biggest advantages.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?
Could you please tell what areas of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) you think could be improved or enhanced? It doesn't necessarily have to be something advanced. Perhaps there are some minor things...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?
Could you please describe your customers' usual use cases for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Compared 66% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Compared 8% of the time
SUSE Rancher vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Logo
SUSE Rancher vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Compared 7% of the time
Tenable.io Container Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Logo
Tenable.io Container Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Compared 5% of the time
Wiz vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Logo
Wiz vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Compared 3% of the time
More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Competitors
BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 32% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 28% of the time
Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Netskope vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 22% of the time
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
Compared 18% of the time
More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
September 2025
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) reportDownload Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]
August 2025
Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] reportDownload Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Threat Stack, CSP,
 

Overview

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Microsoft Azure. It simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications using Kubernetes. With AKS, developers can focus on building applications while Azure takes care of the underlying infrastructure. It offers features like automatic scaling, monitoring, and security, ensuring high availability and reliability. AKS integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, enabling easy integration with existing workflows. It also provides a flexible and open-source environment, allowing developers to use their preferred tools and frameworks. With AKS, organizations can accelerate their application development and deployment processes, while reducing operational overheads.

Microsoft

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers robust security features including endpoint monitoring, rule customization, and integration capabilities, with easy connectivity to cloud services like Docker and AWS.

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides tools for enhancing security visibility across cloud infrastructure. It supports AWS and Docker integration, facilitating efficient threat detection and management. Users appreciate its capability to configure customizable alerts and monitor endpoints, sessions, API interactions, and cloud services. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as better serverless environment support and reduced alert frequency. The platform services smaller organizations by compensating for limited security resources with its comprehensive monitoring and auditing tools.

What are the key features?
  • Easy Cloud Service Integration: Streamlined connectivity with Docker and AWS for efficient monitoring.
  • Customizable Rule Sets: Tailor security rules to meet specific organizational needs.
  • Email Alerts: Receive timely notifications about security events and threats.
  • Interactive Session Monitoring: Track live sessions for suspicious activities.
  • API Integration: Connect effortlessly with third-party tools for an enhanced security posture.
  • SecOps Support: Assistance for organizations lacking dedicated security teams.
What are the benefits and ROI features?
  • Streamlined Threat Detection: Effective process monitoring to identify potential threats.
  • Cost Efficiency: Serves companies with limited resources by providing essential security functions.
  • Comprehensive Audits: Helps in regular examinations of cloud infrastructure, enhancing compliance.
  • Visibility into Cloud Operations: Offers a detailed dashboard for threat visibility and monthly vulnerability assessments.

In specific industries, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is utilized for its strength in monitoring cloud infrastructure and preventing unauthorized access. Organizations in fields where cloud operations are critical use it for regular audits and monitoring. Its capabilities in threat management are leveraged to maintain secure operations and compliance, especially where there is no dedicated security team.

F5
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
StatusPage.io, Walkbase, Spanning, DNAnexus, Jobcase, Nextcapital, Smartling, Veracode, 6sense
Buyer's Guide
Container Security
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Container Security. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.