Azure Data Factory vs SAS Access comparison

Microsoft and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while SAS is ranked #61. Microsoft holds a 2.3% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Azure Data Factory

Read 96 Azure Data Factory reviews

13,392 Views
9,240 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SAS Access

Read 3 SAS Access reviews

1,914 Views
1,493 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Data Factory

SAS Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Access and Azure Data Factory compete in the data integration tools category. Based on their abilities in cloud environments, Azure Data Factory appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive cloud-based features.

Features: SAS Access provides strong data connectivity, compatibility with SAS technologies, and integration within SAS environments. Azure Data Factory offers extensive cloud service integration, automated workflows, and supports a range of data formats.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Access is supported by detailed deployment guidelines and robust technical support, particularly for on-premises systems. Azure Data Factory provides flexible deployment options with comprehensive online support resources and documentation, suiting cloud-native environments well.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Access may incur higher setup costs unless organizations already employ SAS systems, offering good ROI within SAS ecosystems. Azure Data Factory features a subscription-based pricing model, delivering cost-effectiveness and scalability, with high ROI for enterprises leveraging cloud technology.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Data Factory vs. SAS Access Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. SAS Access

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Data Factory

Ranking in Data Integration

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Warehouse (7th)

SAS Access

Ranking in Data Integration

61st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Azure Data Factory is 2.3%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Access is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Data Factory	2.3%
SAS Access	0.8%
Other	96.9%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

KandaswamyMuthukrishnan

Director at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Integrates diverse data sources and streamlines ETL processes effectively

Regarding potential areas of improvement for Azure Data Factory, there is a need for better data transformation, especially since many people are now depending on DataBricks more for connectivity and data integration. Azure Data Factory should consider how to enhance integration or filtering for more transformations, such as integrating with Spark clusters. I am satisfied with Azure Data Factory so far, but I suggest integrating some AI functionality to analyze data during the transition itself, providing insights such as null records, common records, and duplicates without running a separate pipeline or job. The monitoring tools in Azure Data Factory are helpful for optimizing data pipelines; while the current feature is adequate, they can improve by creating a live dashboard to see the online process, including how much percentage has been completed, which will be very helpful for people who are monitoring the pipeline.

Read full review

Robert Heck

Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH

The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible

I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ease in which you can create an ETL pipeline."

"This solution has provided us with an easier, and more efficient way to carry out data migration tasks."

"Synapse was the better choice for us to implement, as it has a lot of out-of-the-box connectors that we can utilize for data transformation and organization."

"The features that I've found most valuable, in order: That it is a complete ETL Solution, the second one is interface, the third one workflow, and the fourth one ease of use."

"The most valuable feature I have found at Azure Data Factory is the data flow function."

"The data is more scalable."

"Azure Data Factory is a very easy to use ETL tool for loading and transforming data from one location to another."

"Azure Data Factory's most valuable features are the packages and the data transformation that it allows us to do, which is more drag and drop, or a visual interface. So, that eases the entire process."

More Azure Data Factory pros

"The SAS/ACCESS ability to connect creates an elegant simplicity."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

Cons

"They should work on optimizing their licensing model and pricing structure."

"When we initiated the cluster, it took some time to start the process."

"There's no Oracle connector if you want to do transformation using data flow activity, so Azure Data Factory needs more connectors for data flow transformation."

"The number of standard adaptors could be extended further."

"The Microsoft documentation is too complicated."

"I wouldn't consider it to be stable since it fails at times."

"Data Factory's monitorability could be better."

"The product integration with advanced coding options could cater to users needing more customization."

More Azure Data Factory cons

"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."

"The primary way that this product can be improved is by adjusting their pricing model."

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While I can't specify the actual cost, I believe it is reasonably priced and comparable to similar products."

"The licensing cost is included in the Synapse."

"My company is on a monthly subscription for Azure Data Factory, but it's more of a pay-as-you-go model where your monthly invoice depends on how many resources you use. On a scale of one to five, pricing for Azure Data Factory is a four. It's just the usage fees my company pays monthly."

"The solution's pricing is competitive."

"The licensing model for Azure Data Factory is good because you won't have to overpay. Pricing-wise, the solution is a five out of ten. It was not expensive, and it was not cheap."

"I am aware of the pricing of Azure Data Factory, but I prefer not to disclose specific details."

"Azure Data Factory gives better value for the price than other solutions such as Informatica."

"For our use case, it is not expensive. We take into the picture everything: resources, learning curve, and maintenance."

More Azure Data Factory pricing and cost advice

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	63

No data available

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?

AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?

Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Snowflake vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

Databricks vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Data Factory Competitors

Toad Data Point vs SAS Access

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Access

Compared 9% of the time

Upsolver vs SAS Access

Compared 7% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SAS Access

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs SAS Access

Compared 6% of the time

More SAS Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory

June 2026

Download Azure Data Factory product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

June 2026

Download SAS Access product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAS/Access

Overview

Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

Microsoft

SAS Access connects users to data across platforms, enabling insights and analytics. It provides seamless access and integration for data processing and management, bridging the gap between extensive datasets and analytics capabilities.

SAS Access offers robust features that facilitate data access and integration, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking to manage, manipulate, and analyze data spread across different storage systems. Users benefit from its ability to deliver comprehensive data access, enhancing efficiency and productivity. By reducing complexities in accessing distant or disparate data, SAS Access stands as a versatile tool for businesses that want to overcome data silos and drive analytics innovation.

What Are the Valuable Features of SAS Access?

Scalability: Efficient handling of large-scale data allows organizations to grow without data processing bottlenecks.
Compatibility: Offers compatibility with a wide range of data sources, including databases and third-party applications, facilitating seamless data integration.
Security: Ensures robust data security protocols to protect sensitive data and maintain compliance with industry standards.

What Benefits Should Be Considered in Reviews?

Improved Decision-Making: Access to diverse data sources bolsters decision-making with comprehensive insights.
Time Savings: Streamlined data access reduces time spent on data preparation, accelerating project timelines.
Cost Efficiency: Efficient data processing reduces infrastructure costs and optimizes resource usage.

In finance, SAS Access is used to streamline data reporting and analysis, providing essential insights for risk management. Retailers use it to merge customer data from disparate sources, enabling personalized marketing. Healthcare organizations utilize it to integrate patient data securely, improving care delivery and outcomes.

SAS

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa

Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. SAS Access

June 2026

Free Report: Azure Data Factory vs. SAS Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. SAS Access and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Data Factory vs. SAS Access report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.