Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs webMethods.io comparison

Axway and IBM are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Axway is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9. Axway holds a 3.8% mindshare in MFT, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

Read 9 Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer reviews

1,066 Views
1,034 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

9,290 Views
465 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer and webMethods.io are competing in the data integration and management sector. While Axway's superior security and compliance options give it an edge for users focused on these aspects, webMethods.io’s integration capabilities and feature-rich environment often make it more appealing for those seeking functionality.

Features: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer offers strong security features, extensive regulatory compliance support, and advanced file tracking capabilities. In comparison, webMethods.io excels in cloud integration, comprehensive API management, and flexible workflow automation.

Room for Improvement: Axway might benefit from enhancements in cloud-native functionality, broader integration options, and improved flexibility in workflows. Meanwhile, webMethods.io could improve by lowering complexity in certain integration processes, offering better pricing options, and enhancing its on-premise deployment capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer provides a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer service to aid in troubleshooting. webMethods.io has a cloud-native deployment model simplifying integration tasks and offers responsive customer service, although it is often lauded for a quicker setup and adaptability.

Pricing and ROI: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is acclaimed for its competitive setup cost and excellent ROI in security-focused sectors. webMethods.io, although considered a premium option, justifies its cost with comprehensive features and efficient data handling, often seen as valuable for businesses prioritizing advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), API Management (11th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is 3.8%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.4%
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer	3.8%
Other	93.8%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Sayantan Sarkar

Technical Lead at HCL Technologies

User-friendly and doesn't take much space when getting installed

When it comes to the tool's scalability, I cannot say that everything can be done in the best version. There is always a scope for improvement. The tool can try to make it a little bit more flexible so that we can easily invoke the APIs, and in such a way, it can be made a little bit better. In general, everything is fine with respect to the tool's scalability. My company has encountered some challenges. The tool does not allow the explicit port for some of the protocols, like FTP. We are still selling the tool to some of our clients. I feel they should allow us to do some testing for the SMB-related protocols or Windows path-related protocols, which we are not allowing, making it difficult for us to identify the issue with respect to those SMB protocols as well as Amazon S3's protocols. I believe it is an area that needs to be fixed so that it will help the end customer do those types of tests without the help of another external tool. As of now, I can remember only these two scenarios where improvements are needed.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It makes a logical link between the inbound/outbound transfer, and makes it clearly visible. This is a very important feature for managing transfer with different environments, and it's very helpful in case of troubleshooting."

"The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"Axway consolidated all of our communications into one platform, simplifying network and port management. Now, all we have to do is open one port to this application, and we can remove all the firewall rules on that port. It's much more straightforward to manage from a security perspective. We used to rely on an archaic FTP solution, but Axway features SFTP, so it was an improvement security-wise."

"It’s very flexible."

"The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system."

"AMPLIFY has all the essential features for managing file transfer."

"It provides a good amount of storage capacity for a reasonable price and has a good range of connectors."

"It is an easy-to-use and stable product."

"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."

"It is good for communicating between the systems and for publishing and subscribing. We can easily retrieve data. It is good in terms of troubleshooting and other things."

"It's a good tool, and it has a stable messaging broker."

"The tool supports gRPC."

"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."

"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."

"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Their monitoring is not up to the mark and needs improvement."

"The areas in need of improvement are the monitoring and the cut-off management, when needed. Today you have at least two solutions: Buy the other Axway suite, Sentinel, or integrate it into your monitoring system."

"The tool can try to make it a little bit more flexible so that we can easily invoke the APIs, and in such a way, it can be made a little bit better."

"It is complicated to manage multi-operations, particularly in handling file name changes within file transcripts."

"Sometimes, the application's embedded databases couldn't perform well for a higher volume of data."

"One area of improvement is troubleshooting. When a transfer fails, they provide little information about the login, which makes troubleshooting difficult. Also, file transfer scheduling is primitive. By that, I mean you can't define a complex schedule, like scheduling a job to run at particular hours multiple times in a day."

"Improvement in Data Encoding would be very appreciated (I'm thinking of ASCII-EBCDIC, ASCII-ASCII, etc.)."

"The initial setup was quite complex."

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer cons

"webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional."

"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."

"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."

"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."

"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."

"There are things that could be improved with the webMethods API gateway. One thing is that it's too attached to the integration service and we'd like it to be a little bit more independent. We would like for them to separate operations so that it doesn't rely on the bulky integration server and so that it can be used everywhere."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AMPLIFY's license is a one-time investment."

"It is quite expensive, and because of that, we get good service from them in return for the price paid."

"Pricing and licensing is related to the protocols you choose to support."

"The platform's price aligns with the market."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"It is worth the cost."

"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors."

"The product is very expensive."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

There's infinite pricing available on their portal, however, it's typically accompanied by a discount. However, detailed pricing information is confidential and was not shared in this call.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

Their monitoring is not up to the mark and needs improvement. They should have enhanced auto-reconnection capabilities for interrupted file transfers and implement features allowing chunk movement ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 26% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 23% of the time

MOVEit vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 14% of the time

JSCAPE by Redwood vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 14% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 14% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

August 2025

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer report

Download Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

August 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

SecureTransport, Axway SecureTransport, AMPLIFY MFT

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

As a multi-protocol MFT gateway, Axway SecureTransport provides the flexibility you need to support virtually any MFT use case. Secure, manage, and track file flows among people and applications inside your enterprise, and beyond your firewall to your user communities, mobile devices, and the cloud. Perform high-volume automated file transfers between systems, sites, lines of business and external partners, to user-driven communications and mobile, folder- and portal-based file sharing.

Axway

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

BNP Paribas Securities Services, Bollor_, E.ON AG Group, BMW Group, IdenTrust, Gassco, International Post Corporation, SNCF, DB Schenker Logistics, Logius, CSCA, La Poste

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.