We performed a comparison between AWS Shield and Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is integrated with AWS. So, it gives you a good first step."
"I am impressed with the product's multiple features like security."
"We have integrated the tool with Active Directory. The most important feature is that it's transparent and doesn't degrade the performance of our solution. Additionally, it's easy to configure, which is crucial for us. It's easy to use and set up and stops attacks on our servers. We haven't encountered any attack problems because the solution stops them in real-time. AWS Shield specifically focuses on defending against denial-of-service attacks, making it a great solution for that type of threat."
"The solution's ease of use is the most valuable feature."
"The product has a good mechanism to analyze trends and trigger events."
"The most important part is that Radware DDoS integrates seamlessly and provides anomaly identification, real-time notifications, and security against DDoS attacks. It also helps us with multi-layer volumetric attacks. It shields us from global botnet threats."
"Provides good monitoring and has a user-friendly dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is the controller that determines when and how traffic can be moved to the cloud."
"DDoS Protection Service provides excellent defense in the cloud, and the implementation and migration are very straightforward."
"The management of it is a bit hard. If you don't engineer it on the front side, it is hard to go back in and change it. It could be improved in terms of architecture requirements and then ongoing support requirements as a secondary component to it. People tend to set up things like this, and they just expect it to work without the care and feeding that needs to go back into it either from an application team or a network environment team."
"The product needs to improve its logs and reports to make it read better."
"We end up having to pay extra for features that AWS adds that we don't need."
"The product should give users more flexibility to customize their security policies according to their requirements."
"The product is expensive."
"Radware's management is very proactive, but Radware's lower-level staff is not proactive. You need to do a lot of follow-ups."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing; the product could be more affordable."
"Customization could be improved."
"We heavily relied on Radware's technical team to ensure the proper setup and configuration of VPN tunnels for cloud mitigation."
More Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Shield is ranked 6th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 5 reviews while Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service is ranked 19th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 4 reviews. AWS Shield is rated 8.6, while Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of AWS Shield writes "The solution automatically scales according to traffic, only takes minutes to deploy, and is maintenance-free". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service writes "Fast mitigation, competitive pricing, and guaranteed SLA". AWS Shield is most compared with Cloudflare, Cloudflare DDoS, Azure DDoS Protection, Akamai App and API Protector and Prolexic, whereas Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service is most compared with Corero and NSFOCUS ADS. See our AWS Shield vs. Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.