AWS Control Tower vs SkyKick Cloud Manager comparison

"The solution's initial setup was easy for me."

"The most significant benefit of Control Tower is its capability to align with our organization's standards."

"With Control Tower, there are ready-to-use automated templates available, simplifying the implementation of a centralized management solution."

"It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."

"Control Tower offers many valuable features for managing all account security."

"Security is the most valuable feature of Control Tower."

"It provides a central point for account management, access control, and compliance monitoring."

"The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on job descriptions in Active Directory. This establishes a direct correlation between the user's name, job definition, and the corresponding rules applied to each account."

"Technical support has been good."

"There is a sync issue within the organization."

"It could be improved by having a more intuitive graphical interface. It could also include other coding languages like PowerShell and Python, as it would be beneficial for DevOps recommendations."

"While using the solution recently, it broke a certain activity. So, AWS Control Tower needs to consider making the solution better."

"There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower."

"The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."

"AWS should provide more resources, examples, and tutorials."

"The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower."

"There aren't any additional features that I feel are missing. However, it's worth noting that Control Tower seems to function as a layer utilizing standard AWS products in the background. Occasionally, the interface may appear less streamlined, with changes in layout based on the underlying products being used. While this doesn't impact functionality, having a more standardized user interface, irrespective of the background products, could enhance the user experience."

"I'm fairly new to the solution and need to explore it further."

"It is expensive but it is an investment in my opinion."

"AWS Control Tower is not really that expensive."

"The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."

"I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their security setups within AWS. Using Control Tower is highly recommended, especially as your company grows and involves Active Directory, various departments, and different architectural aspects. It becomes more advisable to leverage Control Tower rather than managing these aspects manually, especially for larger organizations."

"The pay-as-you-go model ensures you're only charged for what you use, which offers great flexibility for different types of companies."

"The pricing is efficient, not overly expensive but also not very cheap."

"The cost is reasonable, but there are opportunities for improvement in terms of pricing for larger enterprises."

"The solution is free."