AWS Control Tower vs CloudM Manage comparison

"With Control Tower, there are ready-to-use automated templates available, simplifying the implementation of a centralized management solution."

"It aligns well with the customer's needs and it ultimately fosters a strong customer-company relationship."

"Control Tower offers many valuable features for managing all account security."

"It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."

"AWS Control Tower helps to save a lot of work and manage multiple accounts."

"The most significant benefit of Control Tower is its capability to align with our organization's standards."

"Compliance is the most valuable feature."

"It provides a central point for account management, access control, and compliance monitoring."

"CloudM has good stability and scalability."

"By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved."

"It would be beneficial if AWS offered the capability to seamlessly deploy your infrastructure to another region to ensure continuous availability and redundancy."

"There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower."

"AWS Control Tower should improve its fast execution. It also needs more tools for triggering and monitoring AWS services. AWS Control Tower needs more tracking as well."

"The process of closing an AWS account using Control Tower needs improvements to simplify it, especially when managing multiple accounts."

"It is essential to clarify that this isn't necessarily a drawback of the service, but having a clear and concise set of predefined guidelines from AWS for moving existing accounts under AWS Control Tower would be highly beneficial as it would simplify the process and make it more user-friendly."

"The initial setup is complex."

"The integration with other AWS functions has room for improvement."

"CloudM is slow compared to other solutions."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."

"AWS Control Tower is not really that expensive."

"The pay-as-you-go model ensures you're only charged for what you use, which offers great flexibility for different types of companies."

"The pricing structure is closely intertwined with the specifics of your environment and the billing strategy you employ."

"The pricing is efficient, not overly expensive but also not very cheap."

"The solution is free."

"It is expensive but it is an investment in my opinion."

"I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their security setups within AWS. Using Control Tower is highly recommended, especially as your company grows and involves Active Directory, various departments, and different architectural aspects. It becomes more advisable to leverage Control Tower rather than managing these aspects manually, especially for larger organizations."