AWS Control Tower vs CloudM Manage comparison

"The most significant benefit of Control Tower is its capability to align with our organization's standards."

"It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."

"One of the standout advantages is the fine-grained control it offers in terms of permissions and privileges."

"AWS Control Tower helps companies save costs."

"Compliance is the most valuable feature."

"With Control Tower, there are ready-to-use automated templates available, simplifying the implementation of a centralized management solution."

"The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on job descriptions in Active Directory. This establishes a direct correlation between the user's name, job definition, and the corresponding rules applied to each account."

"I would rate the solution a 10 out of 10."

"CloudM has good stability and scalability."

"It would be beneficial if AWS offered the capability to seamlessly deploy your infrastructure to another region to ensure continuous availability and redundancy."

"The sole drawback is its restriction to enable only one Control Tower."

"The tool's setup is very technical. Its pricing can be cheaper."

"AWS Control Tower should improve its fast execution. It also needs more tools for triggering and monitoring AWS services. AWS Control Tower needs more tracking as well."

"AWS should provide more resources, examples, and tutorials."

"There is a sync issue within the organization."

"It is essential to clarify that this isn't necessarily a drawback of the service, but having a clear and concise set of predefined guidelines from AWS for moving existing accounts under AWS Control Tower would be highly beneficial as it would simplify the process and make it more user-friendly."

"It could be improved by having a more intuitive graphical interface. It could also include other coding languages like PowerShell and Python, as it would be beneficial for DevOps recommendations."

"CloudM is slow compared to other solutions."

"AWS Control Tower is not really that expensive."

"The pricing structure is closely intertwined with the specifics of your environment and the billing strategy you employ."

"The cost is reasonable, but there are opportunities for improvement in terms of pricing for larger enterprises."

"It is cost-effective and the associated cost is quite minimal."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The pay-as-you-go model ensures you're only charged for what you use, which offers great flexibility for different types of companies."

"I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their security setups within AWS. Using Control Tower is highly recommended, especially as your company grows and involves Active Directory, various departments, and different architectural aspects. It becomes more advisable to leverage Control Tower rather than managing these aspects manually, especially for larger organizations."

"It operates on a pay-as-you-go model, meaning we are charged only for the services we actively use within it."