BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and AWS Control Tower compete in the cloud management space. AWS Control Tower seems to hold an upper hand due to its comprehensive features and governance capabilities, while BMC is favored for its pricing advantage and support.
Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers orchestration, detailed control over resources, and robust policy management capabilities. AWS Control Tower provides comprehensive cloud governance, a unified management framework, and multi-account setup capabilities.
Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could enhance its ease of use and integration with third-party tools, as well as improve its scalability. AWS Control Tower may improve customization options, complexity in broader integration, and feature updates to keep pace with evolving needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management requires expertise for its flexible deployment, offering responsive customer service. AWS Control Tower features a streamlined setup process with extensive documentation and a support network, providing considerable assistance.
Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is known for competitive setup costs, driven by its detailed control features. AWS Control Tower provides a longer-term ROI through scalable governance and lower operational overhead, balancing costs with scalable benefits.
AWS Control Tower offers the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and enables governance using guardrails you can choose from a pre-packaged list.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
