AutoSys Workload Automation vs Jitterbit Harmony comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
9,418 views|7,029 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Jitterbit Logo
119 views|102 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Jitterbit Harmony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good.""Running anything in crontab, you need to put a lot of logic into it to make it work. With this product, you don't have to worry about it. You have the schedule object where you put all the dates or holidays in it, and it does it for you.""It is stable, it works, and it does what it is supposed to.""The flexibility in solving job scheduling challenges allows us to successfully integrate an acquired business’ fiscal close with our own, even though there is a lot of variance as to when they run in the calendar month.""We automate recurring processes, keeping track of IT processes controlled worldwide.""It is a fairly stable solution.""Inherit Dependencies feature reduces scheduling errors for holiday processing.""Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Pros →

"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features.""It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data.""The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations.""Easy integration with Salesforce""It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput.""It is a scalable solution.""Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases.""Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."

More Jitterbit Harmony Pros →

Cons
"Quick search feature and job analysis could be improved.""I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit.""We had a few issues, however, the issues were more on the infrastructure rather than with the application itself.""Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days.""I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us.""This product needs to improve its graphical user interface.""The graphical interface can be improved.""​CA installation processes are never anything but complex.​"

More AutoSys Workload Automation Cons →

"Sometimes additional connectors are needed.""Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs.""Looping through complex data structures can be difficult.""In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations.""Its API management capabilities need improvement.""I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot.""I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security.""There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."

More Jitterbit Harmony Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Validate how many agents you need beforehand."
  • "CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."
  • "People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."
  • "I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."
  • "It is overpriced."
  • "The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."
  • "There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."
  • More AutoSys Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."
  • "The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."
  • "I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."
  • "Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."
  • "The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"
  • "The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."
  • More Jitterbit Harmony Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    9,418
    Comparisons
    7,029
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    468
    Rating
    8.1
    21st
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    119
    Comparisons
    102
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    234
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE
    Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony
    Learn More
    Overview

    AutoSys Workload Automation delivers end-to-end visibility of application workloads and dependencies across platforms, ERP systems, and the cloud. Thanks to event-based triggering, real-time alerting, and dynamic critical path management, business applications are ensured for availability.

    By intelligently and effectively assigning workloads based on real-time information about the available computing resources and service level agreements, AutoSys Workload Automation scales to enterprise demands with ease. The solution permits businesses to swiftly provision and handle workloads in physical, virtualized, and cloud environments.

    The platform helps to reduce the cost and complexity of managing mission-critical business processes, ensuring consistent and reliable service delivery. AutoSys Workload Automation is a job control solution that allows you to manage workloads via a command-line interface (CLI) or graphical user interface (GUI).

    AutoSys Workload Automation Features

    AutoSys Workload Automation has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Multi-platform scheduling: Manage and visualize a process end to end across multiple platforms from a central point of control.
    • Extensive scalability: Provide production scalability without the need for multiple server instances.
    • Extensive app support: Manage workloads for business apps such as PeopleSoft, SAP, and Oracle E-Business. This results in lower operating costs and increased cross-enterprise visibility.
    • Built-in fault tolerance: Robust, lights-out operations with automated recovery that facilitates the availability of business systems by enabling jobs to be completed accurately and on time.
    • Self service: End-users have the ability to request and execute workload processing that is controlled by workload policy and governance processes. This gives businesses more control over their own services.
    • Security and compliance: Better meet regulatory compliance requirements by defining access permissions at any level. If there are problems, you can view what was changed, by whom, and at what time.

    AutoSys Workload Automation Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing AutoSys Workload Automation. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Job scheduling, monitoring, and reporting: Jobs can be scheduled across platforms. When a job enters different production schedule phases, keep track of it and give reports.
    • Create reports that ease regulatory compliance and improve control.
    • Forecasting is used to detect and comprehend the business impact of work within a job stream. You can send notifications for overdue tasks or bypass less critical jobs.
    • Managing resources: The solution assesses the resources that are available and schedules jobs to achieve a defined SLA, enhancing resource utilization.

    Reviews from Real Users

    AutoSys Workload Automation stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its file transfer protocol and its visibility for batch processing. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    One PeerSpot reviewer, an IT consultant at a computer software company, writes, “The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs.

    Another PeerSpot reviewer, a head at an insurance company, notes, “It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good. It also gives us the ability to connect different software processes.”

    Open source integration platform designed to handle the most complex integration challenges between legacy, enterprise and On-Demand applications. 

    Sample Customers
    Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life
    LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Insurance Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Insurance Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise82%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise84%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 21st in Workload Automation with 13 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch, whereas Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Mule Anypoint Platform and SnapLogic. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony report.

    See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.