AutoSys Workload Automation vs Jitterbit Harmony comparison

Broadcom and Jitterbit are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8, while Jitterbit is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. Broadcom holds a 12.2% mindshare in WA, compared to Jitterbit’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 81 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

6,793 Views
4,876 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Harmony

Read 13 Jitterbit Harmony reviews

86 Views
66 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

Jitterbit Harmony

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Jitterbit Harmony and AutoSys Workload Automation are competitive products in the automation and integration category. Jitterbit Harmony is preferred for its flexibility and ease of integration, whereas AutoSys is favored for its extensive scheduling and workload automation features.

Features: Jitterbit Harmony offers real-time processing, cloud connectivity, and an intuitive user interface conducive to setting up integrations rapidly. AutoSys Workload Automation provides strong scheduling abilities, complex job dependency management, and robust monitoring capabilities, making it ideal for large-scale operations.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Harmony could enhance its complex scheduling features, workforce integration tools, and advanced monitoring capabilities. AutoSys Workload Automation could improve with a more user-friendly interface, quicker deployment options, and simplified training procedures for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AutoSys Workload Automation has a more complex setup, often requiring dedicated training, but offers extensive resources and support. Jitterbit Harmony allows smoother deployment with its user-friendly interface, benefiting businesses that require quick implementation and efficient customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Harmony is perceived as cost-effective with a quicker ROI, suiting small to mid-sized businesses with lower initial setup costs. AutoSys Workload Automation may have higher upfront costs but offers high long-term value for enterprises due to its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jitterbit Harmony

Ranking in Workload Automation

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (32nd), Cloud Data Integration (18th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 12.2%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Harmony is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Mohamed Abd Kader

Head of Enterprise Architecture at Mantrac Group

An easy-to-setup solution with good stability

We use Jitterbit to connect cloud solutions with our on-premises ERP system We connect cloud solutions to our on-premise ERP system easily using Jitterbit. It is its most valuable feature. The solution's API management capabilities need improvement. We have been using the solution for almost…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The flexibility in solving job scheduling challenges allows us to successfully integrate an acquired business’ fiscal close with our own, even though there is a lot of variance as to when they run in the calendar month."

"We get better reports than we use to have."

"The solution has been stable."

"It has allowed us to automate many of the functions of our operations staff. For instance, we had production control staff spending two hours a day entering date parms into our daily business processes. And now, CA Workload Automation does it for us."

"It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers."

"AutoSys Workload Automation is scalable."

"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is batch processing."

"The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."

"Easy integration with Salesforce"

"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."

"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."

"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."

"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."

More Jitterbit Harmony pros

Cons

"The lack of documentation, that is an issue. When we do need to bring it down for maintenance, it is always a scary moment for us because we have never had it crash."

"To make it a lot more user-friendly, in order to make it so other people can use it without having to do much training with it; the more user-friendly it is, the easier it is to work with."

"There is a slow response time by tech support. Unless, you say it's severity level one. That will give you a two hour timing window for them to call you. It doesn't really happen exactly in two hours, but they try."

"The WCC could be improved."

"The scalability is poor because I cannot use it for all automation solutions."

"I am not sure whether it is our limitation or a tool limitation because we haven't yet explored it, but whenever we look for different types of reporting, we have some limitations in getting those. It could be because of the way we have set it up internally in our enterprise, but it would be helpful if we can customize the reporting features and some of the alerts that can go out. When we connect enterprise systems, each one looks for a different use case, and if we can get different types of reporting, it will be helpful."

"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve in the Linux environment. The previous versions of the AutoSys Workload Automation let you take the profile of the user that you were using to run the tasks that you're going to automate, but in the latest versions, you can't do that, you need to make more definitions and it's a little bit difficult. It was easier in the previous versions."

"The cross-platform arena, where you can run work on multiple platforms, needs improvement."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

"Its API management capabilities need improvement."

"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."

"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."

"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."

"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."

"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."

"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."

"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."

More Jitterbit Harmony cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is overpriced."

"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"Validate how many agents you need beforehand."

"We paid to use the solution monthly."

"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

"I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."

"The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"

"The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."

"Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."

"Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."

"The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

48%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

The solution is costly. The pricing is based on the number of users, which for me, translates to approximately $120,000 to $130,000 for a license period of two to three years.

See all answers

What do you like most about Jitterbit Harmony Platform?

It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jitterbit Harmony Platform?

The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jitterbit Harmony Platform?

The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 34% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

SnapLogic vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 27% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 20% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 17% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 15% of the time

More Jitterbit Harmony Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

April 2025

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2025

Download Jitterbit Harmony product report

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony

Overview

AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.

Organizations leverage AutoSys Workload Automation for running extensive workloads day and night, particularly important for banks, insurance clients, and enterprises needing robust job scheduling and file transfer processes. It is crucial for managing cross-functional dependencies with 24/7 automated triggers, batch processing, and centralized business process control, ensuring seamless operations across various servers and environments.

What are the most important features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies initial setup and updates.
SAP Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP environments.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires less frequent updates and interventions.
Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing business needs.
Speed and Stability: Ensures high performance and reliable operations.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances user experience and efficiency.
Real-time Batch Processing View: Provides instant insights into batch jobs.
Compatibility: Works well with various software systems.
Robustness: Delivers consistent, reliable performance.
Easy Setup: Simplifies deployment process.
File Transfer Protocol: Facilitates smooth and secure file transfers.
File Watcher: Monitors and manages file changes effectively.
Performance and Upgrades: Ensures improved performance and simplified upgrades.

What are the benefits or ROI items to consider?

Improved Efficiencies: Reduces manual intervention and automates repetitive tasks.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
Enhanced Reliability: Decreases downtime with robust performance.
Better Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems.
24/7 Operations: Ensures uninterrupted business processes.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing business needs.
Advanced Scheduling: Provides comprehensive job scheduling options.

AutoSys Workload Automation is widely implemented in banking for day and night operations, insurance client environments for reliable support, and enterprises for automated file transfers and robust job scheduling. Organizations centralize business processes and manage cross-functional dependencies effectively with its 24/7 automated triggers, supporting diverse industry needs through scalable and reliable performance.

Broadcom

Jitterbit Harmony is a comprehensive platform for data integration and API management, enabling seamless synchronization and automation across cloud-based and on-premises applications.

Users leverage Jitterbit Harmony to integrate systems like ERP and CRM applications, simplifying complex data workflows and enhancing automation. It supports efficient data migration and ensures smooth connectivity, handling diverse integration needs and helping streamline business processes. Users emphasize its drag-and-drop functionality and extensive templates, which contribute to its robust performance. However, improvements are needed in data mapping, error message clarity, and documentation, especially when dealing with large data volumes.

What are the key features of Jitterbit Harmony?

Easy Integration: Facilitates connecting various applications effortlessly.
Powerful Data Transformation: Offers tools for complex data workflows.
Seamless Connectivity: Supports efficient data migration between cloud and on-premises applications.
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: User-friendly interface for streamlined operations.
Extensive Pre-Built Templates: Provides numerous templates for quicker deployment.
Robust Performance: Ensures reliable operation even with complex tasks.
Flexible Data Format Handling: Manages different data types and formats efficiently.
Efficient API Management: Simplifies and maintains API requests and integrations.

What benefits should users look at when evaluating Jitterbit Harmony?

Scalability: Can grow with your business needs, handling more extensive operations seamlessly.
Automation: Improves business process automation, saving time and resources.
Data Synchronization: Ensures real-time data accuracy and flow between systems.
Support: Provides strong customer support to address integration challenges.

Companies across retail, manufacturing, healthcare, and finance sectors use Jitterbit Harmony to integrate critical applications and automate workflows. In retail, it connects inventory systems with sales platforms, reducing manual effort. Manufacturers sync their ERP systems with supply chain software, optimizing operations. Healthcare organizations integrate patient management systems with insurance databases, streamlining patient care. Financial institutions use it to connect accounting software with banking systems, ensuring real-time financial data exchange.

Jitterbit

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony

April 2025

Free Report: AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony

Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Jitterbit Harmony report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.