Aruba Airwave and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN compete in the network management and orchestration category. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN appears to have the upper hand with superior networking and security features, ideal for large enterprises.
Features: Aruba Airwave offers Clarity and Visual RF for valuable network insights and multivendor support. It's known for orchestration features that enhance monitoring and troubleshooting. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN provides hybrid networking, application-level routing, and centralized management, ideal for a reliable and secure network environment.
Room for Improvement: Aruba Airwave could improve integration with other platforms and reduce costs with better error diagnostics. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN requires improved security features and simplified integration, with calls for an improved licensing model for more straightforward use.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Airwave primarily operates on-premises, offering consistent service quality but faces limitations in varied environments. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN provides flexibility with hybrid and cloud options, making deployment more varied. Both have strong customer support, with Cisco's support being regarded as quicker.
Pricing and ROI: Aruba Airwave is seen as high-cost but sometimes cheaper than Cisco, offering ROI through reduced troubleshooting time. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is one of the more expensive solutions, with a complex pricing model requiring extended licenses for better deals. Both are long-term investments; Aruba offers cost-effective multivendor management, while Cisco's expense is justified by extensive features and reliability.
They are now back to do that with the remainder of their company, so they've realized the value in 12 months and are willing to invest in the remainder of their organization.
I would rate their technical support as a nine or ten, as it's quite good.
Angie was very kind and communicated well in both Spanish and English, making it pleasant to connect with her.
I would consider Cisco support a 10 out of 10.
The principal third-level support is very good.
The technical team is very competent.
Aruba Airwave is fully scalable, as we have a large number of tenants using the network with approximately six thousand end users.
The ease of configuration and features like zero-touch provisioning enhance the scalability of Cisco SD-WAN, especially in disaster recovery situations.
Cisco SD-WAN is highly scalable and can be expanded to more than 10,000 sites.
I have found Aruba Airwave to be stable.
While some software-related issues and bugs were encountered, they did not cause the whole environment to crash.
The end-to-end users' messages show some details that are not always up-to-date, and sometimes the information from the GUI is not exactly aligned with what's on the website.
When upgrading hardware, there were technical issues with network interfaces and Red Hat, which required escalation to developers.
When attempting to copy a floor plan, it does not copy well, so I often have to redraw the walls.
Now, they change frequently, making it difficult to obtain long-term support.
In terms of market leaders, Cisco is capable of doing anything you want it to do, as far as I can see.
Including more features like integrating with Splunk for monitoring vulnerabilities would help eliminate the need for other SOC solutions.
The pricing for Aruba Airwave is acceptable because compared to Cisco, it's slightly cheaper, but not significantly - maybe 5% or 7% less expensive.
The pricing of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is rated between eight and nine out of ten, where ten is the most expensive.
It is also relatively cost-effective for smaller businesses when using the Meraki version.
Its pricing is justifiable due to the comprehensive solution it offers.
Aruba Airwave provides good visibility, offering extensive data on network dynamics, such as access point connections, usage, signal strengths, and potential interference from neighboring Wi-Fi networks.
It provides near real-time monitoring using AIMON and AURO protocols, which is robust with multiple models and brand support.
The feature that proved most beneficial for our organization's network monitoring is the virtual four, which we use frequently when working with Aruba.
It also provides robust security features, including port security, analysis, mirroring, and multiple other security solutions.
Security is standard compliant, eliminating config drift that was prevalent before manual configurations.
The most useful feature for Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is the single pane of glass management because we also use Meraki onsite.
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN serves to connect remote offices, reduce MPLS costs, and facilitate cloud and internet access while providing secure connectivity and centralized management for hybrid networks.
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is leveraged for secure connectivity, load balancing, VPN, centralized network management, and migrating from traditional networks to SD-WAN. It supports hybrid networks, enabling centralized management across branches and data centers, improving security, and optimizing bandwidth usage. Industries such as banking and retail benefit from its capabilities for secure and efficient network management.
What are the main features of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN?
What benefits should be considered in reviews?
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN's implementation in banking enhances secure transaction communication between branches and data centers. Retailers utilize it to ensure steady connectivity for point-of-sale systems and inventory management. Organizations benefit from centralized management, making it easier to handle networks across multiple locations.
We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
