Apiiro vs Coverity comparison

Apiiro and Black Duck are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Apiiro is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Black Duck is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Apiiro holds a 0.7% mindshare in SAST, compared to Black Duck’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apiiro users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.

Apiiro

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

1,529 Views
1,086 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Coverity

Read 43 Coverity reviews

12,588 Views
10,700 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Apiiro

Coverity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Coverity and Apiiro compete in the software security tools category. Apiiro seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and robust security posture management capabilities.

Features: Coverity offers static code analysis, deep inspection abilities, and a focus on code review processes. Apiiro provides integrated risk assessment, security management, and a wide-ranging suite for comprehensive security solutions.

Room for Improvement: Coverity could enhance integration with development tools, improve analysis speed, and address customer support responsiveness. Apiiro might refine its alert system, ensure efficient notifications, and improve user feedback mechanisms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coverity has a straightforward deployment process but requires better support service, while Apiiro offers strong customer support that compensates for a more complex deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Coverity's pricing appeals to budget-conscious organizations but raises concerns about long-term ROI due to operational costs. Apiiro, despite higher initial costs, offers substantial ROI through extensive features and security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiiro vs. Coverity Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. Coverity

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiiro

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (10th), API Security (11th), Software Supply Chain Security (8th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (12th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th)

Coverity

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Apiiro is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Coverity is 7.0%, up from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

Jaile Sebes

Senior Software Architect at Siemens Industry

Resolving critical software issues demands faster implementation and better integration

We use Coverity primarily to find issues such as software bugs and memory leaks, especially in C++ and C# projects. It helps us identify deadlocks, synchronization issues, and product crashes Coverity has been instrumental in resolving product crashes by detecting various issues like deadlocks.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"The most valuable feature is that there were not a whole lot of false positives, at least on the codebases that I looked at."

"Provides software security, and helps to find potential security bugs or defects."

"The most valuable feature of Coverity is its interprocedural analysis, which is advantageous because it compares favorably with other tools in terms of security and code analysis."

"The reporting feature is up to the mark."

"The most valuable feature of Coverity is that it shows examples of what is actually wrong with the code."

"Coverity is scalable."

"The solution has helped to increase staff productivity and improved our work significantly by approximately 20 percent."

"The interface of Coverity is quite good, and it is also easy to use."

More Coverity pros

Cons

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"We actually specified several checkers, but we found some checkers had a higher false positive rate. I think this is a problem. Because we have to waste some time is really the issue because the issue is not an issue. I mean, the tool pauses or an issue, but the same issue is the filter now.Some check checkers cannot find some issues, but sometimes they find issues that are not relevant, right, that are not really issues. Some customisation mechanism can be added in the next release so that we can define our Checker. The Modelling feature provided by Coverity helps in finding more information for potential issues but it is not mature enough, it should be mature. The fast testing feature for security testing campaign can be added as well. So if you correctly integrate it with the training team, maybe you can help us to find more potential issues."

"The reporting tool integration process is sometimes slow."

"I had tried integrating the tool with Azure DevOps, but the report I got stated that my team faced many challenges."

"I would like to see integration with popular IDEs, such as Eclipse."

"Zero-day vulnerability identification can be an add-on feature that Coverity can provide."

"Some features are not performing well, like duplicate detection and switch case situations."

"We'd like it to be faster."

"Right now, the Coverity executable is around 1.2GB to download. If they can reduce it to approximately 600 or 700MB, that would be great. If they decrease the executable, it will be much easier to work in an environment like Docker."

More Coverity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is affordable."

"Depending on the usage types, one has to opt for different types of licenses from Coverity, especially to be able to use areas like report viewing or report generation."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."

"The price is competitive with other solutions."

"Coverity is quite expensive."

"Offers varying prices for different companies"

"Coverity is very expensive."

"The tool's price is somewhere in the middle. It's neither cheap nor expensive. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

32%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apiiro?

Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apiiro?

My understanding is the pricing is pretty competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 23% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 18% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 13% of the time

Legit Security vs Apiiro

Compared 10% of the time

Wiz Code vs Apiiro

Compared 8% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Compared 43% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro

August 2025

Download Apiiro product report

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

August 2025

Download Coverity product report

Also Known As

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Synopsys Static Analysis

Overview

Apiiro is the leader in application security posture management (ASPM), unifying risk visibility, prioritization, and remediation with deep code analysis and runtime context.

Companies like Morgan Stanley, SoFi, Rakuten, and Navan leverage Apiiro's ASPM to...

Get complete application and risk visibility: Apiiro takes a deep, code-based approach to ASPM. Its Cloud Application Security Platform analyzes source code and pulls in runtime context to build a continuous, graph-based inventory of application and software supply chain components.

Prioritize risks with code-to-runtime context: With its proprietary Risk Graph™️, Apiiro contextualizes security alerts from third-party tools and native security solutions based on the likelihood and impact of risk to uniquely minimize alert backlogs and triage time by 95%.

Fix and prevent risks that matter—faster: By tying risks to code owners, providing LLM-enriched remediation guidance, and embedding risk-based guardrails directly into developer tools and workflows, Apiiro improves remediation times (MTTR) by up to 85%.

Apiiro's native security solutions include API security testing in code, secrets detection and validation, software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, sensitive data exposure prevention, software composition analysis (SCA), and CI/CD and SCM security.

Apiiro

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Black Duck

Sample Customers

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. Coverity

July 2025

Free Report: Apiiro vs. Coverity

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiiro vs. Coverity and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiiro vs. Coverity report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.