Apiary vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #37, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Apiary

Read 4 Apiary reviews

405 Views
204 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

2,771 Views
1,536 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apiary

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apiary and webMethods.io compete in the API management and integration platforms sector. webMethods.io is considered superior due to its advanced feature set and integration capabilities, despite Apiary offering favorable pricing and support ratings based on data comparisons.

Features: Apiary offers collaborative API design, testing capabilities, and supports both Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and API Blueprint. It integrates with GitHub for version management. webMethods.io provides comprehensive integration features, advanced mapping, and orchestrating capabilities suitable for complex environments. It also offers robust connectors, API gateway functionality, and scalable integration solutions.

Room for Improvement: Apiary could improve by enhancing its integration features, providing more robust connectors, and expanding its enterprise capabilities. It would benefit from advanced orchestration features and better scalability for larger environments. webMethods.io might enhance its API governance features, improve user interface friendliness, and offer more competitive pricing options for smaller businesses or startups. It could focus on simplifying its setup process for non-enterprise users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io is known for streamlined deployment and robust support services catering to enterprise-scale implementations. It allows for scalability and quick integration. Apiary offers easy deployment with a focus on API design and prototyping, appealing to agile teams and startups looking for quick project setups.

Pricing and ROI: Apiary's pricing is competitive, making it appealing to startups and mid-sized businesses looking for cost-effective API management. The swift ROI is realized through reduced design and development time. webMethods.io, though having a higher setup cost, justifies its price with enhanced integration features that are beneficial for large enterprises managing extensive API ecosystems. Its ROI is seen in scalability and comprehensive integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiary vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. webMethods.io

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiary

Ranking in API Management

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apiary is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.4%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Phil Wilkins

Enterprise Integration Architect at Capgemini

The ability to configure rules to check for consistency has helped

Apiary provides a free tier of the platform which allows a small group of developers to collaborate easily on the design of open source APIs. In addition to this, it provides mock endpoints allowing people to experiment with the API without depending or having to stand up a real backend. With our clients, using Apiary allows us to very quickly pull together an API definition (particularly when using API Blueprint). The whole API design process for the simpler use cases can be done in a relatively short workshop which makes it a lot easier to agree, publish, version-manage an API definition with suitable documentation. This can then be evolved and enhanced (particularly in the documentation aspects). With the ability to support Swagger (Open API v2 and introducing/ed support for v3) and API Blueprint makes it a very versatile tool.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Git integration"

"I do like the overall performance of the solution."

"Quick and easy way to share a new API design with teams."

"In two years, there was one time the service was down for an hour or so."

"I find the generation of mock services very useful, especially when demonstrating for new consumers."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution for me has been the configuration-based UI. Once you get the hang of it, it enables you to easily develop an API. In addition, it has many in-built policies that are quite handy."

"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."

"The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas."

"High throughput and excellent scalability."

"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."

"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The Oracle release cycle is very bad because the patches only update once a year."

"I would like an integrated option to download a Swagger version of the definition."

"Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and Blueprint Support"

"webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional."

"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."

"The configuring of the JWT token would be improved as it is a confusing process. We require more information on this part of the solution."

"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"Technical support is an area where they can improve."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"For code version control, you need to use some external software."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a free subscription option to start and try the service."

"It is easy to get started with personal (free) accounts, but a subscription is required for additional features."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"The solution's development license is free for three to six months. We have to pay for other things."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Apiary

Compared 40% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apiary

Compared 31% of the time

Oracle API Platform Cloud Service vs Apiary

Compared 29% of the time

More Apiary Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

June 2025

Download Apiary product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

June 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Apiary's pioneering APIFlow solution provides the framework and tools for developing application programming interfaces (APIs) that share enterprise services and data and help create modern, cloud-based applications and experiences. APIFlow spans the API creation lifecycle, including design, governance, testing, and documentation, while supporting API Blueprint and OpenAPI industry standardsץ

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce.com, Bloomberg, GoodData, Viacom, Akamai Technologies, DigitalGlobe

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. webMethods.io

June 2025

Free Report: Apiary vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiary vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiary vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.