Apiary vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #37, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Apiary

Read 4 Apiary reviews

417 Views
413 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

9,371 Views
2,624 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apiary

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apiary and webMethods.io compete in the API management and integration platforms sector. webMethods.io is considered superior due to its advanced feature set and integration capabilities, despite Apiary offering favorable pricing and support ratings based on data comparisons.

Features: Apiary offers collaborative API design, testing capabilities, and supports both Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and API Blueprint. It integrates with GitHub for version management. webMethods.io provides comprehensive integration features, advanced mapping, and orchestrating capabilities suitable for complex environments. It also offers robust connectors, API gateway functionality, and scalable integration solutions.

Room for Improvement: Apiary could improve by enhancing its integration features, providing more robust connectors, and expanding its enterprise capabilities. It would benefit from advanced orchestration features and better scalability for larger environments. webMethods.io might enhance its API governance features, improve user interface friendliness, and offer more competitive pricing options for smaller businesses or startups. It could focus on simplifying its setup process for non-enterprise users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io is known for streamlined deployment and robust support services catering to enterprise-scale implementations. It allows for scalability and quick integration. Apiary offers easy deployment with a focus on API design and prototyping, appealing to agile teams and startups looking for quick project setups.

Pricing and ROI: Apiary's pricing is competitive, making it appealing to startups and mid-sized businesses looking for cost-effective API management. The swift ROI is realized through reduced design and development time. webMethods.io, though having a higher setup cost, justifies its price with enhanced integration features that are beneficial for large enterprises managing extensive API ecosystems. Its ROI is seen in scalability and comprehensive integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiary vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiary

Ranking in API Management

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apiary is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Phil Wilkins

Enterprise Integration Architect at Capgemini

The ability to configure rules to check for consistency has helped

Apiary provides a free tier of the platform which allows a small group of developers to collaborate easily on the design of open source APIs. In addition to this, it provides mock endpoints allowing people to experiment with the API without depending or having to stand up a real backend. With our clients, using Apiary allows us to very quickly pull together an API definition (particularly when using API Blueprint). The whole API design process for the simpler use cases can be done in a relatively short workshop which makes it a lot easier to agree, publish, version-manage an API definition with suitable documentation. This can then be evolved and enhanced (particularly in the documentation aspects). With the ability to support Swagger (Open API v2 and introducing/ed support for v3) and API Blueprint makes it a very versatile tool.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Git integration"

"I do like the overall performance of the solution."

"I find the generation of mock services very useful, especially when demonstrating for new consumers."

"In two years, there was one time the service was down for an hour or so."

"Quick and easy way to share a new API design with teams."

"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."

"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."

"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."

"The orchestration aspects of APIs, the integration capabilities, and the logging functionalities were the most critical features of our workflow."

"webMethods API Portal is overall very valuable. It is now a comprehensive API catalogue that serves various purposes, including API assessment and evaluation."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a good solution for interacting with outside of the organization. We can integrate the solutions with multiple outside the organization."

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and Blueprint Support"

"I would like an integrated option to download a Swagger version of the definition."

"The Oracle release cycle is very bad because the patches only update once a year."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."

"The solution's release management feature could be better."

"The configuring of the JWT token would be improved as it is a confusing process. We require more information on this part of the solution."

"It could be more user-friendly."

"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."

"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."

"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a free subscription option to start and try the service."

"It is easy to get started with personal (free) accounts, but a subscription is required for additional features."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman Enterprise vs Apiary

Compared 43% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apiary

Compared 29% of the time

Apigee vs Apiary

Compared 29% of the time

More Apiary Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download Apiary product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

July 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Apiary's pioneering APIFlow solution provides the framework and tools for developing application programming interfaces (APIs) that share enterprise services and data and help create modern, cloud-based applications and experiences. APIFlow spans the API creation lifecycle, including design, governance, testing, and documentation, while supporting API Blueprint and OpenAPI industry standardsץ

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce.com, Bloomberg, GoodData, Viacom, Akamai Technologies, DigitalGlobe

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Free Report: Apiary vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiary vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiary vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.