Anakam.TFA vs Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anakam.TFA and Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
46th
Views
107
Comparisons
76
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Datablink
Video Not Available
Overview

Once users have access to a portal or applications, it is important to identify that the same users are returning in order to maintain security of the system and guard against account take-over, data loss and theft. Multifactor authentication is a simple yet secure way of knowing who is using your applications and ensuring that they are exactly who you expect them to be.

Our strong, multi-factor authentication product offers a range of layered, secure authentication methods in a single integrated platform. It delivers secure one-time passcodes via multiple vectors:

SMS (text messages)

Mobile app

Voice message (IVR)

Hard token

Out-of-band delivery of quickly expiring, one-time passcodes confirms that the person possessing the passcode is the one attempting to access your systems. Multiple authentication vectors ensure high-level security with user-required flexibility and usability.

If a biometric method is required or desired, two-factor authentication can also be done through voice biometrics – a secure, software-based method that doesn't require special hardware or detailed training.

Progressive authentication is our term for the best practice we pioneered—using an integrated set of tools and processes for situation-based authentication of known users seeking access to secure networks, data, and applications.

Based on your policy decisions, our solution will trigger authentication challenges at login or when suspicious transactions, unknown or risky devices, or out-of-norm behavior is recognized. These security authentication parameters can be customized in real-time for users both inside and outside your organization, progressively presenting authentication challenges based upon the latest threat assessment.

Datablink Mobile 200 offers advanced authentication and financial transactions signing for organizations and their customers. It enables advanced authentication and financial transaction signing. Rather than requiring a user to physically type a code into a device to generate a one-time password, users simply use their smartphone to confirm their identities. No other devices are required. To verify a user's identity or sign a specific transaction, the organization can choose to employ push technology or use a QR Code that is read by the user's smartphone camera. 

Sample Customers
Cinemark, City of Phoenix, RehabCare, PepsiAmericas, ServiceMaster, Exelon Corporation, Stein Mart
Mizuho, Banco Paulista, BTGPactual, Cetip, Telefonica, FIS, TOTVS, ICBC, Azul, Sicob, Unimed, Ype, Digitro, Brinks, Martins, Sicredi
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Anakam.TFA is ranked 46th in Authentication Systems while Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems. Anakam.TFA is rated 0.0, while Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Anakam.TFA is most compared with , whereas Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.