Amazon Lightsail vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Microsoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.0% mindshare in PSP, compared to Microsoft’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Amazon Lightsail

Read 13 Amazon Lightsail reviews

990 Views
990 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 10 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

496 Views
476 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Lightsail

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Amazon Lightsail and Azure Red Hat OpenShift compete in the cloud hosting and management category. Amazon Lightsail often has the upper hand for cost-effectiveness and simplicity, while Azure Red Hat OpenShift leads in features and scalability for enterprise needs.

Features: Amazon Lightsail integrates pre-configured virtual servers, storage, and databases. It provides a straightforward platform for small applications and quick deployments. Azure Red Hat OpenShift offers a scalable Kubernetes environment with integrated DevOps capabilities, focusing on complex applications and continuous integration workflows. It features a user-friendly GUI, efficient routing thanks to its internal networking, and built-in load balancing with HAProxy for easier application management.

Room for Improvement: Amazon Lightsail could enhance its advanced configuration options to better support growing businesses or more complex requirements. Additionally, expanding support for different application stacks and increasing scalability could add value. Azure Red Hat OpenShift could reduce its learning curve to make the platform more accessible for new users. It may also look into minimizing operational costs and handling complex multi-cloud scenarios more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Lightsail offers easy deployment and intuitive management, suitable for quick starts. Its simplicity serves well for those unfamiliar with cloud infrastructure. Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides comprehensive deployment options to support larger and more complex infrastructure. It boasts excellent customer support, offering extensive resources for enterprise-level operations.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon Lightsail provides a predictable pricing model, with options starting as low as five dollars, which is appealing for small-scale projects due to low operational costs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift involves higher setup expenses reflecting its robust capabilities for enterprises. Although costly, it promises higher ROI for complex deployments due to its scalability and feature richness, making it valuable for organizations seeking long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Lightsail vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Lightsail vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Lightsail

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Amazon Lightsail is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon Lightsail	2.0%
Azure Red Hat OpenShift	0.7%
Other	97.3%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

VictorAugusto De Souza E Silva

Cloud Engineer at Leek Solucoes

Has simplified website migration and reduced hosting costs significantly

Amazon Lightsail should have some kind of scale service. To be more clear, if I need to scale up my instance or VPS, I need to create a snapshot and create a new instance from this snapshot with more resources, such as CPU, RAM, or disk. It would be beneficial to have a welcome instance where we can just set the instance, go there to edit and select a greater instance from large to x-large or 2x-large. I do not see the need to scale down, but it would be good too. When we are on an x-large for testing purposes and need to do a rollback to a large one, we need to scale down. We do not have this capability on Amazon Lightsail.

Read full review

ArtemiiKropachev

Vice President, Engineering & Principal Architect at Li9 Technology Solutions

A high-performing solution provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand and lot of automation that developers can utilize

Azure Red Hat OpenShift is very valuable because it is a complete application delivery platform with a lot of automation that developers can utilize. It's a complete solution without building your own on top of Kubernetes. As a consulting company, we implement Azure Red Hat OpenShift for our clients, who appreciate its integration capabilities for enhancing cloud operations. While we handle implementation, build processes, and automation, the operational responsibility lies with the customer. The service provides basic processes and support from Red Hat and Microsoft, which benefits clients by allowing them to focus on their business rather than regular operations like cluster upgrades.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The intuitive management console of Amazon Lightsail is very good because it is simple; with just a few clicks, I can set a blog online, a WordPress blog online, a new e-commerce online, or just a new application with NodeJS."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"One of the product's most valuable features is its fixed pricing, which makes it ideal for small projects and websites that do not require scaling."

"I find Lightsail particularly valuable for hosting WordPress as it is easier to set up than a bare metal server, which requires extensive configuration and package installations."

"The instances optimized for WordPress are very lightweight and straightforward in configuration."

"We use Amazon Lightsail for hosting security components in-house and AI modules."

"Implementations are completed with a few clicks, allowing efficient transitions to other development stages, and setup is easy whether for online support or basic business requirements."

"In Lightsail, they simplified to do it in as few clicks as possible. So, around ten clicks, I have a virtual machine deployed."

More Amazon Lightsail pros

"As a consulting company, we implement Azure Red Hat OpenShift for our clients, who appreciate its integration capabilities for enhancing cloud operations. While we handle implementation, build processes, and automation, the operational responsibility lies with the customer. The service provides basic processes and support from Red Hat and Microsoft, which benefits clients by allowing them to focus on their business rather than regular operations like cluster upgrades."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"I don't see this solution as enterprise-ready, for bigger companies like banks."

"It would be beneficial if Lightsail allowed easier upgrade and change processes, similar to EC2 instances, without needing to fully back up and reinstall configurations."

"The solution could be smoother than it is."

"When you need to add some custom rules to Amazon Lightsail, the auto scaling feature is a bit difficult."

"The product's network features need enhancement."

"Based on my limited exploration of Amazon Lightsail so far, I would like to see improvements in the console, particularly in user behavior and some cost-related aspects."

"Amazon Lightsail needs more security in the networking because hackers can attack in application layers three and four."

"Amazon Lightsail should have some kind of scale service. To be more clear, if I need to scale up my instance or VPS, I need to create a snapshot and create a new instance from this snapshot with more resources, such as CPU, RAM, or disk."

More Amazon Lightsail cons

"Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix."

"The product is expensive."

"Automation could be improved."

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."

"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The services that it provides are good for the price."

"A few months ago, Lightsail's pricing increased, likely due to the addition of the new VPC feature."

"The affordability of starting at five dollars makes it an attractive option for startups and medium-sized companies, aligning with budget considerations while offering essential cloud services."

"Lightsail is available at an affordable cost starting from five dollars per month."

"It's very cheap."

"Amazon Lightsail is a bit cheaper than Amazon EC2."

"The prices are better than EC2 machines, for instance, because they are simplified management, but it works well, and I am able to run everything that I need on it."

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

11%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Lightsail?

In Lightsail, they simplified to do it in as few clicks as possible. So, around ten clicks, I have a virtual machine deployed.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Lightsail?

Lightsail is available at an affordable cost starting from five dollars per month. This cost may increase with additional features like a static IP.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Lightsail?

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretati...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 33% of the time

Google Cloud vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 28% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 8% of the time

Render vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon Lightsail Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 43% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 22% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 22% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 12% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Lightsail

October 2025

Download Amazon Lightsail product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

October 2025

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Overview

Lightsail is ideal for simpler workloads, quick deployments, and getting started on AWS. It’s designed to help you start small, and then scale as you grow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. Kubernetes is at the core of Red Hat OpenShift. OpenShift brings added-value features to complement Kubernetes, making it a turnkey container platform as a service (PaaS) with a significantly improved developer and operator experience.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Lightsail vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

September 2025

Free Report: Amazon Lightsail vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Lightsail vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Lightsail vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.