Amazon Inspector vs Bitsight comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and BitSight are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while BitSight is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.0% mindshare in IVRM, compared to BitSight’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of BitSight users who would recommend it.

Amazon Inspector

Read 9 Amazon Inspector reviews

2,669 Views
133 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Bitsight

Read 9 Bitsight reviews

2,376 Views
1,283 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Inspector

Bitsight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Bitsight and Amazon Inspector are competing products in the cybersecurity space, offering unique advantages. Amazon Inspector may offer a better overall value due to its superior features.

Features: Bitsight provides performance in continuous monitoring of third-party risks, a comprehensive security rating, and enhances vendor risk management. Amazon Inspector features automated assessment capabilities for quick vulnerability identification, seamless AWS integration, and vulnerability categorization including container repositories.

Room for Improvement: Bitsight could enhance integration capabilities, broaden support for non-vendor-related risk scores, and lower setup complexity. Amazon Inspector could offer custom compliance rules, improve usability for non-AWS users, and expand on third-party software integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitsight offers straightforward deployment with robust customer support for diverse environments. Amazon Inspector ensures fast cloud-based deployment as part of AWS, though challenging for non-AWS users, and provides comprehensive customer service for those familiar with AWS.

Pricing and ROI: Bitsight's substantial setup cost is balanced by ROI tied to organization size and priorities. Amazon Inspector presents cost-effective, scalable pricing for AWS customers, promising ROI for organizations invested in AWS.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Inspector vs. Bitsight Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. Bitsight

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,282 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Inspector

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (20th)

Bitsight

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Attack Surface Management (ASM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Inspector is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitsight is 7.5%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitsight	7.5%
Amazon Inspector	1.0%
Other	91.5%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Abdalla Kenawy

AWS DevOps SRE/Infrastructure Engineer at Capgemini

Automated insights streamline data security assessment

For Amazon Inspector, we have many EC2 or virtual machines deployed inside our AWS environment, and the problem is that the existing package deployed inside this EC2 instance has already outdated packages. As we progress with time, this package needs to be updated for security enhancement, which requires us to uninstall the package, install the new version, and then we should be fine. However, the challenge comes with how to scan all our EC2 instances for security vulnerabilities, which is currently managed by Amazon Inspector. Amazon Inspector can scan EC2 instances or ECR, which is the ECR registry where we can save artifacts Docker images. Amazon Inspector can also scan Docker images uploaded to ECR for Elastic Registry service, and it can scan databases and S3 based on the latest updates. I noticed this from a couple of months ago, and it provides huge benefits for security. Regarding the best features of Amazon Inspector, it gives us a list of all existing outdated packages as part of a deployed package on EC2 instances or specific Python packages that are part of the Docker file and the Docker image itself, which are causing security concerns. Amazon Inspector can list these security concerns and offer guidance on how we can remediate it by updating the package to a specific upper version or something similar.

Read full review

Suresh A.

Senior AIML Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Continuous monitoring has strengthened external security and improved customer trust

There are areas for improvement; we do notice sometimes finding vulnerabilities which gives us visibility to find them quickly. However, there could be a mechanism they can build on top of that for validation as they identify the issues. What will the real risk be for that identifiable issue? Sometimes it could be open because of the traffic; how they detected it could be seen as vulnerable, but upon testing, it might not be a real issue. It could be a false positive because there could be a honeypot that we built. My thinking is about validation, so if they can build that validation part before they expose the risk to the specific asset, that would help. Additionally, based on their reporting, they could also build risk scores and prioritization, which would also aid us. I would suggest adding dashboards and custom reporting, which could help us by enabling rich custom reports with filters. That is especially for leadership because they will not look at each technical area, but overall they would be looking at the risk score and what the assets or critical exposure areas are. Customizable reporting based on requirements would be valuable. I chose 9 out of 10 because the reporting and dashboards would be the first thing I would consider for improvement, and then the second is about the validation part, which could probably improve to 10 out of 10. I cannot think of too much for additional improvements. Maybe some good automation with the API solutions that could be integrated with the CI/CD pipeline or DevOps tools we are running would also be automated and tested.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My experience with AWS technical support is very good, I didn't face any specific challenges, and even the documentation of AWS is good for both Microsoft, which is Azure, and AWS."

"The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integrate third-party tools as well. It is just a single-click option."

"The assessment reports provided by Amazon Inspector have helped me in identifying security vulnerabilities in my cloud applications by giving us a nicely designed dashboard that provides all the security information we need to work on remediation."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Inspector is the categorization of findings, which filters vulnerabilities by instance, container image, container repository, and Lambda function."

"The vulnerability discovery is valuable, and they also rank those vulnerabilities for you. So, you could rapidly attack some of the higher, severe vulnerabilities as they pop up, if they do pop up."

"I recommend Amazon Inspector because it allows the automation of processes and requires less manual monitoring."

"Amazon Inspector is highly stable, rated ten out of ten, and this stability impacts business security and administration positively."

"It operates continuously, so as soon as resources are created, it scans them for vulnerabilities."

More Amazon Inspector pros

"Bitsight gives me a holistic view of my entire security posture, which is something any organization would want to have after getting a tool such as Bitsight."

"My advice to others looking into using Bitsight is that it provides a lot of information that was not available before, and it is especially good in recon as it can identify many things about an organization that have never been found earlier, making it a valuable tool."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"Its customer service team responds quickly."

"Bitsight has positively impacted my organization by improving security and customer trust, giving us continuous monitoring so we now find misconfigurations within hours instead of days or weeks, which directly improves our overall security posture and reduces risk as we catch high-risk exposures early, especially unexpected cloud assets or testing endpoints that accidentally went public."

"I prefer BitSight due to its patch management capabilities. The score is a valuable feature. I have contacted the customer support through e-mail and their response rate is fast. I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"Offers open ports from an external point of view."

"The product helps us identify the vulnerabilities of internet-facing applications."

More Bitsight pros

Cons

"One area for improvement in Amazon Inspector is the automation aspect."

"The false positive rate of Amazon Inspector is a little high, and it is not covering all different applications and scanning."

"There isn't too much to improve right now. Scanning on demand or as a part of the pipeline versus a post pipeline solution would be good, but it is not a deal breaker by any means."

"It has a limited scope. So, AWS Inspector primarily focuses on the security of the EC2 instance. So, if your architecture includes other AWS services, then you may need to use additional tools for your comprehensive security assessment. So that is one con. Another is, like, we have a dependency on agents."

"The most challenging aspect I faced with Amazon Inspector during integration was automating the remediation process."

"One major area for improvement is remediation. My team works on remediating findings over time, likely using available patches. However, easier integration with Amazon's patching services would be very helpful."

"There is room for improvement in the scanning capabilities. I'd like to see broader coverage in terms of the vulnerabilities detected."

"The other point is that the reporting features of Inspector need improvement. For example, I am in an organization with millions of CVEs, and getting an overview of all this is challenging."

More Amazon Inspector cons

"There are areas for improvement; we do notice sometimes finding vulnerabilities which gives us visibility to find them quickly. However, there could be a mechanism they can build on top of that for validation as they identify the issues."

"We found that some of the findings are clear false positives, but they still report that, and based on that, the rating goes down until we rectify them."

"There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side."

"Data enrichment is the major issue."

"The solution’s benchmarking should be improved."

"Its factor analysis feature could be better."

"At the moment, when the vulnerability score decreases, it remains the same for quite a while, even though issues are resolved in 24 hours."

"BitSight could improve the classes and lower-level detections of anomalies that compound the information used to compute the rating."

More Bitsight cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is scaled as you go. There are probably a certain number of scans per month, and there are tiers. If you're under a certain tier, it is free. The second level is pennies, and then all the way up to like a million. So, it has a tiered pricing program. They're pretty good with your initial scanning, and there is room to scale based on being affordable, but it is fairly cheap. There are no additional costs. They pretty much think about it as a pay-per-scan type model."

"The lowest cost would be around $10 for a few small accounts, however, for thousands of accounts, it could be around $5000 to $6000 dollars per month."

"It's priced according to market standards for its services."

"The pricing is very transparent and clear."

"The solution's price is average."

"The product has a reasonable price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Inspector?

The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Inspector?

I am not honestly sure about the pricing side of Amazon Inspector, but that is taken care of by a separate team. I believe it's cheaper than the other third-party solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Inspector?

They might launch support for third-party environments in the next version regarding the best features in Amazon Inspector from my perspective. The false positive rate of Amazon Inspector is a litt...

See all answers

What do you like most about BitSight?

The solution is user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BitSight?

The product is a little expensive and very oriented to large companies.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BitSight?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Nessus vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 12% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 6% of the time

Wiz vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon Inspector Competitors

SecurityScorecard vs Bitsight

Compared 20% of the time

Cortex Xpanse vs Bitsight

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Bitsight

Compared 6% of the time

RiskRecon vs Bitsight

Compared 5% of the time

Black Kite vs Bitsight

Compared 5% of the time

More Bitsight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector

January 2026

Download Amazon Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

Bitsight

January 2026

Download Bitsight product report

Overview

Amazon Inspector is an automated security assessment service that helps improve the security and compliance of applications deployed on AWS. Amazon Inspector automatically assesses applications for exposure, vulnerabilities, and deviations from best practices. After performing an assessment, Amazon Inspector produces a detailed list of security findings prioritized by level of severity. These findings can be reviewed directly or as part of detailed assessment reports which are available via the Amazon Inspector console or API.

Amazon Inspector security assessments help you check for unintended network accessibility of your Amazon EC2 instances and for vulnerabilities on those EC2 instances. Amazon Inspector assessments are offered to you as pre-defined rules packages mapped to common security best practices and vulnerability definitions. Examples of built-in rules include checking for access to your EC2 instances from the internet, remote root login being enabled, or vulnerable software versions installed. These rules are regularly updated by AWS security researchers.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

BitSight transforms how organizations manage cyber risk. The BitSight Security Ratings Platform applies sophisticated algorithms, producing daily security ratings that range from 250 to 900, to help organizations manage their own security performance; mitigate third party risk; underwrite cyber insurance policies; conduct financial diligence; and assess aggregate risk. With over 2,100 global customers and the largest ecosystem of users and information, BitSight is the Standard in Security Ratings. For more information, please visit www.bitsight.com, read our blog or follow @BitSight on Twitter.

BitSight

Sample Customers

betterment, caplinked, flatiron, university of nutri dame

Fannie Mae, Cabela's, BNP Paribas, PWC, AIR Worldwide, Con Edison, The Container Store, OshKosh, Steris, University of South Florida, Emblem Health, Lloyds Bank

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. Bitsight

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon Inspector vs. Bitsight

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Inspector vs. Bitsight and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,282 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Inspector vs. Bitsight report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.