Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Bedrock vs DigitalOcean comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Amazon Bedrock offers cost-efficient usage-based charges but unexpected fees may impact perceived returns despite reduced manual intervention.
Sentiment score
6.1
Most users saved significantly in the first month using DigitalOcean, although some didn't notice financial gains.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Amazon Bedrock's customer service is highly rated for efficiency and responsiveness, with strong support and documentation quality.
Sentiment score
6.5
DigitalOcean's customer service is responsive, but users seek improved 24/7 technical support, with no phone contact available.
So, you always have to bridge the gap by presenting scenarios, getting recommendations, and testing or validating those assumptions.
DigitalOcean support is rated lower than AWS's because we encounter issues more frequently.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Amazon Bedrock excels in scalability using AWS, integrating well yet faces limitations like rate and token limits at hyperscale.
Sentiment score
7.2
DigitalOcean enables scalable infrastructure, easily managing increased demands with tools and load balancers, supported by comprehensive documentation.
It is scalable on a truly global basis.
It scales well with AWS Lambda, AWS Transcribe, and Polly.
Amazon Bedrock is quite highly scalable, but there are some limitations they impose on the accounts, which could be an area for improvement.
I have not tried vertical scaling yet, but from the documentation, it seems very easy to scale the system.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Amazon Bedrock is reliable and stable, handling workloads seamlessly, maintaining performance, and achieving high user satisfaction ratings.
Sentiment score
7.9
DigitalOcean is largely stable and reliable, with occasional downtime, but mostly meets user expectations for uninterrupted performance.
DigitalOcean is quite stable, and I would rate its stability at nine out of ten.
It is approximately 50 to 60% stable, reaching 60 to 70% depending on usage levels.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek improvements in documentation, integration, pricing, UI, AI capabilities, and introduction of Amazon native models.
DigitalOcean struggles with reliability, security, and performance, needing better flexibility, monitoring, and user experience for improved functionality.
In AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.
If AWS provided methods, like five or six prompts that yield specific results, it would ease development.
The user interface of Amazon Bedrock on the management console needs improvements.
DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments.
There are issues where even with 8 GB RAM, the performance doesn't meet expectations.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Bedrock offers flexible, consumption-based pricing, cost-effective for experimentation, though enterprise models can be expensive.
DigitalOcean provides flexible enterprise pricing, starting at $5/month, valued for scalability despite some users finding it slightly costly.
Our cost is incredibly low, operating for a few hundred dollars a month in production.
One customer paid around $100 to $200 per month, which was significant given their overall infrastructure costs.
It follows a pay-as-you-go model, with different pricing for context and versions like 1.2, 2.3, and 3.1.
DigitalOcean offers affordable pricing, especially for startups.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Bedrock offers secure, cost-effective AI model customization and seamless integration, enhancing performance and trust in deployments.
DigitalOcean offers user-friendly, reliable cloud servers with cost-effective features like droplets, managed databases, and easy scaling integration.
It has improved operational costs and efficiency significantly, saving money and enhancing the quality of operations.
Amazon Bedrock offers an environment where we only pay for the model we use, and AWS handles the scaling.
The ability to make changes in the foundational model is valuable since different customers have specific needs, allowing customization.
The most significant aspect is that we can connect directly to the system from anywhere.
The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Bedrock
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
12th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
AI Infrastructure (2nd)
DigitalOcean
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
14th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Charles Powell - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good security features for strengthened data protection
I am not going to speak to their roadmap. Amazon operates Bedrock as an ecosystem supporting third-party models. I am speculating here, but I am sure those third-party models will always be present. However, one must consider that Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock, since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers. They have done this somewhat for generative AI, however, in AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.
Michael Olayemi - PeerSpot reviewer
Enjoy cost-effective hosting with flexible deployment and room for payment model improvement
I use only one feature, which is the droplet, and it has been satisfactory. The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well. I also have total freedom over what I use, and I have a better user interface and documentation compared to Oracle.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Bedrock?
The pricing depends on the LLM model in use, such as the 1.2 Anthropic Claude ( /products/claude-reviews ). Costs are based on the number of characters obtained in return. It follows a pay-as-you-g...
What needs improvement with Amazon Bedrock?
AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) could add prompt engineering methods to its services. Currently, there are no prompt methods, so we have to experiment on our own. If AWS provided methods, like...
What is your primary use case for Amazon Bedrock?
We are using Amazon Bedrock ( /products/amazon-bedrock-reviews ) for generative AI-related tasks. We utilize Anthropic Claude ( /products/claude-reviews ) LLM to obtain appropriate answers for user...
What do you like most about DigitalOcean?
It's been a good choice for us for some services. We generally have several deployments. For instance, for some static Angular applications, it was a clear choice to run them on Cloudflare, which p...
What needs improvement with DigitalOcean?
DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments. It would be beneficial to have more flexibility without fixed paym...
What is your primary use case for DigitalOcean?
I primarily use DigitalOcean to deploy applications. I rent the system from them, where I deploy my web servers and application servers. I use it to host my applications since moving from Oracle. I...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Digital Ocean
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
jQuery Foundation, Pertino, TaskRabbit, Compose, InfluxDB, The Able Few
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Bedrock vs. DigitalOcean and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.