Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Bedrock vs DigitalOcean comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
3.9
Amazon Bedrock offers cost-efficiency with a usage-based model, despite some initial billing issues affecting financial benefits.
Sentiment score
6.1
Users generally found DigitalOcean cost-effective, noticing initial savings, though some lacked details to quantify exact financial impact.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Amazon Bedrock's support is responsive and effective, highly rated for addressing issues quickly, though some areas need improvement.
Sentiment score
6.5
DigitalOcean's customer service is responsive yet inconsistent, needing improved technical support and quicker resolutions compared to AWS.
We are experiencing the fastest time ever to get things done with AI integrating into our work, regardless of where we are.
So, you always have to bridge the gap by presenting scenarios, getting recommendations, and testing or validating those assumptions.
My experience with the technical support has been very good because they resolved my billing issue within a day.
DigitalOcean support is rated lower than AWS's because we encounter issues more frequently.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.0
Amazon Bedrock offers scalable solutions with AWS integration, facing limitations like rate limits and pricing concerns at hyperscale.
Sentiment score
7.2
DigitalOcean is highly rated for scalability, offering tools to manage increased loads and easily add resources like RAM or CPUs.
It is scalable on a truly global basis.
Amazon Bedrock is quite highly scalable, but there are some limitations they impose on the accounts, which could be an area for improvement.
It scales well with AWS Lambda, AWS Transcribe, and Polly.
I have not tried vertical scaling yet, but from the documentation, it seems very easy to scale the system.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Amazon Bedrock is praised for its reliability, security, seamless scalability, and stable performance, highly rated by users.
Sentiment score
7.8
DigitalOcean offers reliable stability, though some users note occasional downtimes and performance fluctuations based on extended use.
The stability of Amazon Bedrock is good as I have not faced any issues.
DigitalOcean is quite stable, and I would rate its stability at nine out of ten.
It is approximately 50 to 60% stable, reaching 60 to 70% depending on usage levels.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon Bedrock needs better documentation, integration, pricing, and enhanced AI capabilities to meet user demands for efficiency and accessibility.
DigitalOcean struggles with performance, customer dissatisfaction, and service issues, prompting calls for improved features and better support.
In AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.
For companies in general, the main pain point or main issue related to Amazon Bedrock is security because they are not confident that all information is hidden by this kind of architecture.
If AWS provided methods, like five or six prompts that yield specific results, it would ease development.
DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments.
There are issues where even with 8 GB RAM, the performance doesn't meet expectations.
The lack of a proper service provider model ultimately led us to cease operations with DigitalOcean.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users appreciate Amazon Bedrock's flexible pricing, but some experience high costs, necessitating careful design to optimize expenses.
DigitalOcean's pricing ranges from $5 to $50 monthly, with costs depending on configuration and perceived as competitive by some.
Our cost is incredibly low, operating for a few hundred dollars a month in production.
One customer paid around $100 to $200 per month, which was significant given their overall infrastructure costs.
The pricing and licensing of Amazon Bedrock are quite flexible.
DigitalOcean offers affordable pricing, especially for startups.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Bedrock enhances security, scalability, and efficiency with customizable AI models, seamless integration, and powerful computational resources.
DigitalOcean provides reliable, cost-effective servers with an intuitive interface, database management, flexible hosting, and easy installation.
It has improved operational costs and efficiency significantly, saving money and enhancing the quality of operations.
The valuable features that have helped in leveraging generative AI for operational efficiency improvements include customization capabilities, various types of models suitable for specific use cases, and the integration of knowledge bases.
The ability to make changes in the foundational model is valuable since different customers have specific needs, allowing customization.
The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well.
The most significant aspect is that we can connect directly to the system from anywhere.
The team was particularly satisfied with the flexibility of the service and the rules for managing virtual machines on DigitalOcean.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Bedrock
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
AI Infrastructure (2nd)
DigitalOcean
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

RodrigoBassani - PeerSpot reviewer
Advanced integration and flexible architecture drive efficient business solutions
I have to gain more maturity to provide some improvements to Amazon Bedrock. I have a lot to do with the environment they already provided. For example, they are able to connect to any LLM solution such as Llama, Meta, Gemini, or ChatGPT. It is open; you just choose your favorite LLM solution, and you can integrate it into Amazon Bedrock. We have a lot of possibilities to do this integration at this moment; we just need to work on it, create more maturity, and then we can provide some enhancements that we can see on the solution as a whole. For companies in general, the main pain point or main issue related to Amazon Bedrock is security because they are not confident that all information is hidden by this kind of architecture. They wonder if they are providing some company information that can run away, and I think that is the challenge we have now. We need to find ways to work on it and make our clients' data secure. They are looking for that to guarantee that this is a great solution for companies that is also secure.
Michael Olayemi - PeerSpot reviewer
Enjoy cost-effective hosting with flexible deployment and room for payment model improvement
I use only one feature, which is the droplet, and it has been satisfactory. The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well. I also have total freedom over what I use, and I have a better user interface and documentation compared to Oracle.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Bedrock?
The pricing depends on the LLM model in use, such as the 1.2 Anthropic Claude ( /products/claude-reviews ). Costs are based on the number of characters obtained in return. It follows a pay-as-you-g...
What needs improvement with Amazon Bedrock?
The only aspect that could be improved about Amazon Bedrock is the pricing. There are no additional features or improvements needed for the product itself.
What is your primary use case for Amazon Bedrock?
Amazon Bedrock is one of the services which is similar to ChatGPT. From my perspective, I was creating a version of ChatGPT that would answer my customers' questions. The significant difference bet...
What do you like most about DigitalOcean?
It's been a good choice for us for some services. We generally have several deployments. For instance, for some static Angular applications, it was a clear choice to run them on Cloudflare, which p...
What needs improvement with DigitalOcean?
There are disadvantages, such as machines getting stuck or disconnected, requiring restarts. Sometimes we lose connection and need to check with the IT service provider from the DigitalOcean servic...
What is your primary use case for DigitalOcean?
We use DigitalOcean mostly for RDS services and cloud-related systems where we want to deploy codes and run them using nginx or other services where it is cheaper to use, and we use it to extract d...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Digital Ocean
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
jQuery Foundation, Pertino, TaskRabbit, Compose, InfluxDB, The Able Few
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Bedrock vs. DigitalOcean and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.