Amazon Aurora vs SAP IQ comparison

SAP IQ and Amazon Aurora are strong contenders in the database solutions category. SAP IQ is often preferred for its query speed and data compression, while Aurora is noted for its ease of use and management capabilities.

Features: SAP IQ is recognized for its exceptional query speed, effective data compression, and columnar storage that enhances performance and space efficiency. Amazon Aurora stands out for its easy management, scalability, and seamless AWS integration, along with its automated backup and scaling features, which offer compatibility with MySQL and PostgreSQL.

Room for Improvement: SAP IQ users suggest enhancements in disaster recovery options, marketing efforts, and a reduction in high costs to increase awareness and utilization. Amazon Aurora faces challenges with its pricing structure, limited AI capabilities, and the need for better developer tools and options outside AWS environments, which users recommend addressing to broaden adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP IQ primarily supports on-premises deployments, which fits well with established IT infrastructures, though its customer service is often criticized for insufficient expertise and delayed responses. Amazon Aurora, being cloud-centric, offers flexibility with both public and private cloud deployment options and is praised for its highly rated customer support and global coverage.

Pricing and ROI: SAP IQ is seen as cost-effective in implementation and hardware savings, with complex licensing models that need careful enterprise consideration. Users find its setup costs lower than competitors like Teradata. In contrast, Amazon Aurora adopts a cloud-based usage model with competitive pricing billed on usage rather than licenses, balancing performance with favorable operational expenditures despite its higher costs than self-managed solutions.