Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Altair Panopticon vs CloverETL comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Altair Panopticon
Ranking in Data Visualization
32nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (40th)
CloverETL
Ranking in Data Visualization
39th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (65th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Visualization category, the mindshare of Altair Panopticon is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloverETL is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Visualization
 

Featured Reviews

Use Altair Panopticon?
Share your opinion
it_user856614 - PeerSpot reviewer
Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation
Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Visualization solutions are best for your needs.
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Datawatch Panopticon
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BlackRock, Nasdaq, Citadel, Citi, Imagine Software, Deutsche Bank, FIS, HSBC, Morgan Stanley
IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Splunk, Qlik and others in Data Visualization. Updated: June 2025.
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.