Acunetix vs Pentera comparison

Acunetix and Pentera are key competitors in the cybersecurity software market, focusing on vulnerability assessment and management solutions. Acunetix appears to have an advantage with its fast automated scans and detailed reporting, while Pentera excels in continuous vulnerability assessments and evidence-based remediation.

Features: Acunetix offers a web-based graphical interface, a scan scheduler, and a robust vulnerability scanner for cross-site scripting. Its Interactive Application Security Testing module provides detailed insights. Pentera is known for continuous vulnerability assessments and evidence-based remediation, with its cloud-based solutions, Pentera Core and Surface, effectively evaluating cybersecurity perimeters.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance its IAS tool, better integrate OWASP Top Ten vulnerabilities, and expand manual testing options. Additionally, reducing false positives and improving licensing flexibility are needed. Pentera could improve its dashboard capabilities, better integrate with existing pentesting processes, and offer more affordable licensing for smaller organizations. Simplifying its technical reporting for executive understanding would also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix supports on-premises, private, public, and hybrid cloud deployments, with generally positive customer support experiences but varying response times. Pentera supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments with reliable tech support, although its ticketing system results in average response times.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix pricing is viewed as expensive with a complex licensing model, yet it provides good value for its features, offering positive ROI through improved application security. Pentera is also considered costly, delivering good value for its vulnerability assessment capabilities, contributing to its appreciated ROI for comprehensive security assessments.