ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Comindware Tracker comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Comindware are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.4, while Comindware is ranked #42. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.7% mindshare in PA, compared to Comindware’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Comindware users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

2,093 Views
523 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comindware Tracker

Read 15 Comindware Tracker reviews

335 Views
151 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Comindware Tracker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Comindware Tracker and ActiveBatch by Redwood compete in the business process management and automation space. ActiveBatch is often preferred for its robust features, indicating it delivers more value despite Comindware's appeal in pricing and support.

Features: Comindware Tracker offers an intuitive workflow design, real-time reporting, and scalability, benefiting mid-sized organizations. ActiveBatch by Redwood provides advanced scheduling, extensive integration capabilities, and powerful automation features, making it suitable for larger enterprises needing comprehensive solutions.

Room for Improvement: Comindware Tracker could enhance its feature set to cater more to enterprise users, offer more advanced integration options, and improve automation complexity handling. ActiveBatch by Redwood may benefit from simplification of its setup process, improvements in ease of use for less technical users, and enhancement of its user interface experience for smoother navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comindware Tracker's cloud-based deployment allows for quick implementation with structured support. ActiveBatch by Redwood offers flexible deployment but might require more setup time. Comindware ensures consistently available customer service, while ActiveBatch caters to complex environments with extensive support services.

Pricing and ROI: Comindware Tracker provides a cost-effective upfront investment promising quicker ROI for businesses. ActiveBatch by Redwood requires a higher initial investment but offers long-term value with its extensive automation capabilities and efficiency improvements, justifying its cost for companies needing advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Workload Automation (9th)

Comindware Tracker

Ranking in Process Automation

42nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (45th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Sarah Sheluchin

Works

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has helped with scheduling complex jobs with simple scripts."

"From a scheduling point of view, it is pretty good."

"The most valuable feature is its stability. We've only had very minor issues and generally they have happened because someone has applied a patch on a Windows operating system and it has caused some grief. We've actually been able to resolve those issues quite quickly with ActiveBatch. In all the time that I've had use of ActiveBatch, it hasn't failed completely once. Uptime is almost 100 percent."

"Using this tool, if there are any huge failures, we immediately get an email notification, and the proper team will be informed, at which time they can act accordingly."

"Since I started using this product, I have been able to easily track everything as it mainly monitors, alerts, and looks after all the services - even across platform scheduling - which has helped me immensely."

"Error Handling is one of the best standout features of ActiveBatch."

"The user interface is really incredible."

"One of the most valuable features is the job templates. If we need to create an FTP job, we just drag over the FTP template and fill out the requirements using the variables that ActiveBatch uses. And that makes it reusable. We can create a job once but use it for many different clients."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."

"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."

"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."

"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."

"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."

"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."

"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."

"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."

More Comindware Tracker pros

Cons

"The thing I've noticed the most is the Help function. It's very difficult, at times, to find examples of how to do something. The Help function will explain what the tool does, but we're not a Windows shop at the data warehouse. Our data warehouse jobs actually run on Linux servers. Finding things for Linux-based solutions is not as easy as it is for Windows-based solutions. I would like to see more examples, and more non-Windows examples as well, in the Help."

"Setting up the software was hard."

"There is this back and forth, where ActiveBatch says, "Your Oracle people should be dealing with this," and Oracle people say, "No, we don't know anything about ActiveBatch." Then, it all falls back on me as to what happens. Nobody is taking responsibility. This is the biggest failing for ActiveBatch."

"The help center and documentation are not that helpful."

"There are very few documents that provide us with detailed information on the troubleshooting of errors that occur during integration with the existing environment."

"The product should be improved by providing a customization option."

"They have some crucial design flaws within the console that still need to be worked out because it is not working exactly how we hoped to see it, e.g., just some minor things where when you hit the save button, then all of a sudden all your job's library items collapse. Then, in order to continue on with your testing, you have to open those back up. I have taken that to them, and they are like, "Yep. We know about it. We know we have some enhancements that need to be taken care of. We have more developers now." They are working towards taking the minor things that annoy us, resolving them, and getting them fixed."

"The user interface can be improved so that it is more appealing and accessible to new users."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."

"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."

"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."

"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."

"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."

"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."

"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."

"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."

More Comindware Tracker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"This solution has a very lost cost."

"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."

"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"

"The price is so reasonable."

"Great value for the money."

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 17% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 14% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

August 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Comindware Tracker

August 2025

Download Comindware Tracker product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
Unified Document and Data Management
Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.

Comindware

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

July 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.