ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Comindware Tracker comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Comindware are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.4, while Comindware is ranked #41. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.6% mindshare in PA, compared to Comindware’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Comindware users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

532 Views
177 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comindware Tracker

Read 15 Comindware Tracker reviews

145 Views
30 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Comindware Tracker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Comindware Tracker and ActiveBatch by Redwood compete in the business process management and automation space. ActiveBatch is often preferred for its robust features, indicating it delivers more value despite Comindware's appeal in pricing and support.

Features: Comindware Tracker offers an intuitive workflow design, real-time reporting, and scalability, benefiting mid-sized organizations. ActiveBatch by Redwood provides advanced scheduling, extensive integration capabilities, and powerful automation features, making it suitable for larger enterprises needing comprehensive solutions.

Room for Improvement: Comindware Tracker could enhance its feature set to cater more to enterprise users, offer more advanced integration options, and improve automation complexity handling. ActiveBatch by Redwood may benefit from simplification of its setup process, improvements in ease of use for less technical users, and enhancement of its user interface experience for smoother navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comindware Tracker's cloud-based deployment allows for quick implementation with structured support. ActiveBatch by Redwood offers flexible deployment but might require more setup time. Comindware ensures consistently available customer service, while ActiveBatch caters to complex environments with extensive support services.

Pricing and ROI: Comindware Tracker provides a cost-effective upfront investment promising quicker ROI for businesses. ActiveBatch by Redwood requires a higher initial investment but offers long-term value with its extensive automation capabilities and efficiency improvements, justifying its cost for companies needing advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), Workload Automation (8th)

Comindware Tracker

Ranking in Process Automation

41st

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (50th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Sarah Sheluchin

Works

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The software offers real-time monitoring and reporting features that let IT teams keep tabs on the progress of their batch operations and workflows."

"We are able to integrate it into multiple third-party tools like email, backup, tracking systems, SharePoint, Slack alerts, etc."

"We leverage the solution's native integrations regularly. We have to get files from a remote server outside the organization, and even send things outside the organization. We use a lot of its file manipulation and SFTP functionality for contacting remote servers."

"I found ActiveBatch Workload Automation to be a very good scheduling tool. What I like best about it is that it has very less downtime when managing many complex scheduling workflows, so I'm very impressed with ActiveBatch Workload Automation."

"Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis."

"The product offers a centralized platform for managing activities across many environments, applications, etc."

"The REST API adapters and native integrations for integrating and orchestrating the software stack are very flexible."

"Easy to configure and simple to develop new features."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."

"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."

"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."

"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."

"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."

"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."

"Low code development."

"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."

More Comindware Tracker pros

Cons

"They could provide an easier installation guide or technical support to the organizations during the installation process."

"The documentation is very limited, and it can be improved."

"It does have a little bit of a learning curve because it is fairly complex. You have to learn how it does things. I don't know if it's any worse than any other tool would be, just because of the nature of what it does... the learning curve is the hardest part."

"Some improvements can be made to the user interface."

"I have faced struggles to understand, set up the tool, and implement it in my early days as a new user."

"It could be easier to provide dashboards on how many jobs are running at the same time; more monitoring."

"ActiveBatch UI could use a little more help, and video tutorials would be greatly appreciated for user guides."

"I can't get the cleaning up of logs to work consistently. Right now, we are not setup correctly, and maybe it is something that I have not effectively communicated to them."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."

"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."

"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."

"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."

"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."

"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."

"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."

"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."

More Comindware Tracker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."

"The price is so reasonable."

"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."

"This solution has a very lost cost."

"Great value for the money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 18% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 13% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 11% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

June 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Comindware Tracker

June 2025

Download Comindware Tracker product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood automates and manages batch processes, data integration tasks, and workflow scheduling. It's used for file transfers, data processing, server monitoring, and report generation, supporting both on-prem and cloud environments.

Organizations implement ActiveBatch by Redwood to automate complex job scheduling and data workflows, integrating seamlessly with FTP, SQL, PowerShell, and other systems. With features like real-time monitoring, error handling, and centralized management, users can significantly boost productivity while minimizing manual intervention. Its flexibility in supporting on-premises and cloud environments makes it adaptable for diverse IT landscapes. The tool simplifies workflow orchestration with an extensive library of pre-built steps and robust API integrations, ensuring efficiency in handling various workloads.

What are ActiveBatch by Redwood's key features?

Job automation: Automates routine and complex jobs.
Real-time monitoring: Offers instant insights into job performance.
Customizable workflows: Tailors workflows to specific business needs.
PowerShell integration: Supports advanced script execution.
Job triggering: Initiates tasks based on specific conditions.
File handling: Manages file transfers and processing efficiently.
Server management: Monitors and handles server tasks consistently.
API integration: Connects with various applications for streamlined operations.
Alerting: Provides notifications for critical job events.
Flexible scheduling: Enables detailed and adaptable job scheduling.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Centralized management: Simplifies oversight of all processes.
Productivity boost: Reduces manual effort and errors.
Time savings: Accelerates task completion and workflow execution.
Comprehensive visibility: Enhances monitoring of all job activities.
Reliable performance: Ensures consistent task execution.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business and IT needs.

In various industries, ActiveBatch by Redwood is used to streamline operations, whether in finance handling large-scale data processing, healthcare managing patient records, or retail optimizing supply chains. It addresses specific needs by offering robust automation, efficient job scheduling, and seamless integration with existing systems, driving operational excellence and efficiency.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
Unified Document and Data Management
Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.

Comindware

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

June 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.