ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Comindware Tracker comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Comindware are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.5, while Comindware is ranked #41. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.6% mindshare in PA, compared to Comindware’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Comindware users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

664 Views
231 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comindware Tracker

Read 15 Comindware Tracker reviews

126 Views
44 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Comindware Tracker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Comindware Tracker and ActiveBatch by Redwood compete in the business process management and automation space. ActiveBatch is often preferred for its robust features, indicating it delivers more value despite Comindware's appeal in pricing and support.

Features: Comindware Tracker offers an intuitive workflow design, real-time reporting, and scalability, benefiting mid-sized organizations. ActiveBatch by Redwood provides advanced scheduling, extensive integration capabilities, and powerful automation features, making it suitable for larger enterprises needing comprehensive solutions.

Room for Improvement: Comindware Tracker could enhance its feature set to cater more to enterprise users, offer more advanced integration options, and improve automation complexity handling. ActiveBatch by Redwood may benefit from simplification of its setup process, improvements in ease of use for less technical users, and enhancement of its user interface experience for smoother navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comindware Tracker's cloud-based deployment allows for quick implementation with structured support. ActiveBatch by Redwood offers flexible deployment but might require more setup time. Comindware ensures consistently available customer service, while ActiveBatch caters to complex environments with extensive support services.

Pricing and ROI: Comindware Tracker provides a cost-effective upfront investment promising quicker ROI for businesses. ActiveBatch by Redwood requires a higher initial investment but offers long-term value with its extensive automation capabilities and efficiency improvements, justifying its cost for companies needing advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

5th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (6th), Workload Automation (4th)

Comindware Tracker

Ranking in Process Automation

41st

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (51st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Nisha Senarathne

Works

Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop

Comindware is great for workflow management. It's user-friendly and trustworthy. You don't need technical skills to develop, maintain and update workflows. Using the intuitive web-based user interface of the visual workflow builder, you can design and set up workflows. Comindware Tracker is a good…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As far as centralization goes it's nice because we can see all these processes that are tied to this larger process. The commissions, FTP processing, the reporting, the file moves to the business users — all that is right there. It's very easy to read. It's easy to tie it together, visually, and see where each of these steps fits into the bigger picture."

"I found ActiveBatch Workload Automation to be a very good scheduling tool. What I like best about it is that it has very less downtime when managing many complex scheduling workflows, so I'm very impressed with ActiveBatch Workload Automation."

"We leverage the solution's native integrations regularly. We have to get files from a remote server outside the organization, and even send things outside the organization. We use a lot of its file manipulation and SFTP functionality for contacting remote servers."

"From a scheduling point of view, it is pretty good."

"The automation feature is a very valuable feature as the associates do not have to worry about performing repetitive tasks (i.e. endpoint security scans on a daily basis) that would take several hours to complete on a daily basis."

"The Jobs Library has been a tremendous asset. For the most, that's what we use. There are some outliers, but we pretty much integrate those Jobs Library steps throughout the process, whether it's REST calls, FTP processes, or file copies and moves... That has helped us to build end-to-end workflows."

"ActiveBatch helped us automate and schedule routine tasks such as data backups, file transfers, database updates, and report generation, which frees IT staff to focus on other studies."

"Since we are no longer waiting for an operator to see that a job is finished, we have changed our daily cycle from running in eight hours down to about five. We had a third shift-operator retire and that position was never refilled."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."

"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."

"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."

"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."

"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."

"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."

"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."

"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."

More Comindware Tracker pros

Cons

"The reporting needs improvement. There is a real need for the ability to generate audit reports on the fly. It needs to be a lot easier than what I can do right now. This is a major item for me."

"Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referring to the documents."

"One thing I've noticed is that navigation can be difficult unless you are familiar with the structure that we have in place. If someone else had to look at our ActiveBatch console and find a job, they might not know where to find it."

"They could provide an easier installation guide or technical support to the organizations during the installation process."

"The documentation is very limited, and it can be improved."

"Whenever there is an overload, we are seeing crashes happening."

"Providing some detailed training materials could be very helpful for new users who have very limited technical information about the tool."

"The interface is not that user-friendly and is a little tough to navigate."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."

"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."

"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."

"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."

"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."

"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."

"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."

"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."

More Comindware Tracker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."

"The price is so reasonable."

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."

"This solution has a very lost cost."

"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"

"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."

"Great value for the money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 21% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 18% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 14% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

May 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Comindware Tracker

May 2025

Download Comindware Tracker product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood automates and manages batch processes, data integration tasks, and workflow scheduling. It's used for file transfers, data processing, server monitoring, and report generation, supporting both on-prem and cloud environments.

Organizations implement ActiveBatch by Redwood to automate complex job scheduling and data workflows, integrating seamlessly with FTP, SQL, PowerShell, and other systems. With features like real-time monitoring, error handling, and centralized management, users can significantly boost productivity while minimizing manual intervention. Its flexibility in supporting on-premises and cloud environments makes it adaptable for diverse IT landscapes. The tool simplifies workflow orchestration with an extensive library of pre-built steps and robust API integrations, ensuring efficiency in handling various workloads.

What are ActiveBatch by Redwood's key features?

Job automation: Automates routine and complex jobs.
Real-time monitoring: Offers instant insights into job performance.
Customizable workflows: Tailors workflows to specific business needs.
PowerShell integration: Supports advanced script execution.
Job triggering: Initiates tasks based on specific conditions.
File handling: Manages file transfers and processing efficiently.
Server management: Monitors and handles server tasks consistently.
API integration: Connects with various applications for streamlined operations.
Alerting: Provides notifications for critical job events.
Flexible scheduling: Enables detailed and adaptable job scheduling.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Centralized management: Simplifies oversight of all processes.
Productivity boost: Reduces manual effort and errors.
Time savings: Accelerates task completion and workflow execution.
Comprehensive visibility: Enhances monitoring of all job activities.
Reliable performance: Ensures consistent task execution.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business and IT needs.

In various industries, ActiveBatch by Redwood is used to streamline operations, whether in finance handling large-scale data processing, healthcare managing patient records, or retail optimizing supply chains. It addresses specific needs by offering robust automation, efficient job scheduling, and seamless integration with existing systems, driving operational excellence and efficiency.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
Unified Document and Data Management
Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.

Comindware

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

April 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.