Spark SQL Reviews

Name: Spark SQL
Brand: Apache
Rating: 3.9 (14 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

14 reviews
85% willing to recommend

164 followers

What is Spark SQL?

Spark SQL is a Spark module for structured data processing. Unlike the basic Spark RDD API, the interfaces provided by Spark SQL provide Spark with more information about the structure of both the data and the computation being performed. There are several ways to interact with Spark SQL including SQL and the Dataset API. When computing a result the same execution engine is used, independent of which API/language you are using to express the computation. This unification means that developers can easily switch back and forth between different APIs based on which provides the most natural way to express a given transformation.

Get the Spark SQL Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Spark SQL, Apache Spark, Amazon EMR and more!

Spark SQL is the #5 ranked solution in top Hadoop solutions. PeerSpot users give Spark SQL an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Spark SQL is most commonly compared to Apache Spark: Spark SQL vs Apache Spark. Spark SQL is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 75% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 22% of all views.

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Featured Spark SQL reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Spark SQL can improve the documentation they have provided. It can be a bit unclear at times. They could improve the documentation a bit more so that we can understand it more easily. Moreover, they could improve SparkUI to have more advanced versions of the performance and the queries and all.

Read full review

SurjitChoudhury

Data engineer at Cocos pt

My experience with the initial setup of Spark SQL was relatively smooth. Understanding the system wasn't overly difficult because the data was structured in databases, and we could use notebooks for coding in Python or Java. Configuring networks and running scripts to load data into the database were routine tasks that didn't pose significant challenges. The flexibility to use different languages for coding and the ability to process data using key-value pairs in Python made the setup adaptable. Once we received the source data, processing it in SparkSQL involved writing scripts to create dimension and fact tables, which became a standard part of our workflow. Setting up Spark SQL was reasonably quick, but sometimes we face performance issues, especially during data loading into the SQL Server data warehouse. Sequencing notebooks for efficient job runs is crucial, and managing complex tasks with multiple notebooks requires careful tracking. Exploring ways to optimize this process could be beneficial. However, once you are familiar with the database architecture and project tools, understanding and adapting to the system become more straightforward.

Read full review

Aria Amini

Data Engineer at Behsazan Mellat

We used Amber for Spark SQL's installation. We used Amber to install some IDs like Zeppelin and altering and Python. We used the tool and the Zeppelin ID. Installation is easy, but it can get complex if you want to use SparkSQL's cluster feature as well. But overall, the installation is not complex. It takes two or three days to deploy the solution if you want to install it on the Zeppelin ID and the Hadoop cluster. We needed one engineer to install and deploy the solution. Four engineers and some developers are working on the solution and doing development work in this environment. The solution just requires one person for maintenance because of the Amber framework.

Read full review

Spark SQL mindshare

As of May 2025, the mindshare of Spark SQL in the Hadoop category stands at 10.5%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hadoop

PeerResearch reports based on Spark SQL reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Hadoop	May 1, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	May 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Spark SQL vs Apache Spark	May 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Spark SQL vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop	May 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Spark SQL vs Amazon EMR	May 1, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Apache Spark	4.2	17.8%	90%	66 interviews Add to research
Amazon EMR	3.9	13.9%	86%	23 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

"Spark SQL's efficiency in managing distributed data and its simplicity in expressing complex operations make it an essential part of our data pipeline."
"I find the Thrift connection valuable."
"One of Spark SQL's most beautiful features is running parallel queries to go through enormous data."

Room for Improvement

"In terms of improvement, the only thing that could be enhanced is the stability aspect of Spark SQL."
"I've experienced some incompatibilities when using the Delta Lake format."
"It would be useful if Spark SQL integrated with some data visualization tools."

Pricing

"We don't have to pay for licenses with this solution because we are working in a small market, and we rely on open-source because the budgets of projects are very small."
"We use the open-source version, so we do not have direct support from Apache."
"The on-premise solution is quite expensive in terms of hardware, setting up the cluster, memory, hardware and resources. It depends on the use case, but in our case with a shared cluster which is quite large, it is quite expensive."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Spark SQL Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.